The Best Budget Lenses

by Chris Gampat on 04/16/2010

Various lenses with different physical and relative aperture sizes.

Various lenses with different physical and relative aperture sizes.

If you’re shopping for a new lens of some sort, you’ve come to just the right place. As per the results of my recent reader polls, here is a list of the best lenses you can get your hands on without breaking the bank too much.

Edit: Due to popularity of this posting, Amazon links have also been inserted. Please support The Phoblographer.

Edit 1/2/2010: I have updated this list to include Pentax and Sony lenses due to popular demand.

Editor 4/14/2013: And we’ve edited the list again

Canon

Canon 40mm STM on 5DmkII

Canon 50mm F1.8/F1.4- When I first moved to Canon, I started out with the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
. Though it has some slight quirks to it (autofocus is a bit hard to do at time and can be slow) it is still a wonderful general purpose lens and an excellent lens for when videos need to be shot at something like a concert. Stopped down to F4, it is wonderfully sharp.

If you can afford it, the Canon EF 50mm f1.4 USM is much better and is one of Canon’s best buys.

Canon 100mm Macro 2.8- Known as one of Canon’s sharpest lenses, users will appreciate the versatility available with using a lens like this. One can go from shooting portraits, to macro products, to the fine details at a wedding, and to even sports shooting when put in a cropped sensor body like a 7D or a 50D (available at a rebate at the time of writing this article.) One really can’t go wrong with the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM.

Canon 85mm F1.8- This is my second favorite lens in my camera bag. The Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM allows for super sharp portraits, headshots, and even candid moments when shooting events or a wedding. What’s great is that you have a telephoto reach without having a really large lens that tends to attract attention: therefore making the photographer more discrete and also allowing them not to disturb their subjects.

Canon 35mm F2.0- The Canon EF 35mm f2.0 is a great lens for events or photojournalism type shooting. This lens is great for capturing environmental portraits, and also for giving a real feel for what the vibe is like at an event. Combined with a flash, it can be great on the dance floor of a party and delivers sharp results with wonderful color.

Canon 40mm f2.8- For years, Canon users have been asking for a pancake lens. Though it took them a while, the Canon 40mm f2.8 is the company’s answer to that challenge and from our review, it seems like it was well worth the wait. The 40mm f2.8 is sharp edge to edge, focuses quickly and is extremely affordable. It’s more than earned its right on this list.

Nikon

Chris Gampat Digital Camera Review Nikon D7100 product photos (1 of 7)ISO 5001-200 sec at f - 5.0

Nikon 50mm F1.8/F1.4- The Nikon 50mm f/1.8D AF is sharper than Canon’s but doesn’t deliver as pleasing out-of-focus areas. In fact, it’s quite a bit sharper and comes with a slightly higher price as well. The Nikon 50mm f/1.4D AF is used widely at concerts and weddings in addition to photographers who capture portraits with cameras like a D300s. Many wedding photographers actually do this and deliver some fantastic and lovely results. I’ve seen some prints from photographers in Brooklyn shooting by the Brooklyn Bridge, and combined with their SB-900 flashes, it does some great work on quite the budget.

Also be sure to consider the newer 50mm F/1.8 G.

Nikon AF-S 35mm F1.8- I’ve tried this lens on the Nikon D3x before. For the price, Nikon photographers get a lens that will stick with them in their bags forever. A lens like this is sharp, focuses surprisingly fast, and can be used for photo shoots, shooting couples, portraits, weddings, etc. Many portrait photographers I know actually use the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S DX.

Nikkor 28mm F2.8D- Nikon’s wide angle primes are becoming legendary, and the Nikon 28mm f2.8D AF is quite worth its weight in dollars. A lens like this is great for getting up close and personal with your subjects, like children, dogs, etc. Otherwise, it is great for shooting landscapes and some street photography.

Nikkor 85mm F1.8D- Although it’s not the absolutely gorgeous F1.4, the Nikon 85mm f1.8D AF is a lens that is seen on many Nikon photographers’ cameras. This lens is the essential lens for portrait photographers and those looking to do in studio work. Stopped down to around F2.8 it becomes super sharp. The feel and construction of this lens will also not disappoint.

Nikon 40mm f2.8- If you’re a Nikon user looking for a nice macro lens, the 40mm f2.8 is your answer. Becoming essentially a 60mm f2.8 lens, it is an interesting perspective leaning towards the longer side of the normal field of view range. Combined with a fast f2.8 aperture, it’s the lens you’ll want to tote around when you want to do a couple of projects at home.

Micro Four Thirds

Chris Gampat The Phoblographer Olympus 45mm f1.8 review product photos (1 of 3)

Panasonic 20mm F1.7- As perhaps the most favorite lens amongst Micro Four Thirds photographers, the Panasonic LUMIX G 20mm f1.7 delivers wonderful results in all types of lighting and also does this in a small pancake type body.

Olympus M. Zukio 17mm F2.8- An alternative to the 20mm for those that want a wider field of view, the Olympus 17mm f2.8 Lens is still a great lens for the Micro Four Thirds system due to sharp image quality and wide aperture.

Olympus 45mm f1.8- Despite the fact that everyone drools over the Olympus 75mm f1.8, this is the lens we recommend more than any others due to the wider field of view and the fast f1.8 aperture. This is the lens you’ll want to shoot wide open or just barely stopped down all day and all night. And if you’re a Micro Four Thirds users going for a budget friendly option, this is the best you can get.

Olympus 60mm f2.8- The Olympus 60mm f2.8 is another macro lens option–but the killer feature of this lens is the weather sealing. We’ve tested it out and we approve; it’s sharp, contrasty, and really overall quite good. As always though, we recommend using flashes to take advantage of specular highlights.

Sony Alpha and NEX

Chris Gampat The Phoblographer Sony NEX 35mm f1.8 OSS product image lead (1 of 1)ISO 16001-200 sec at f - 4.0

Sony 50mm F/1.8 DT- Designed specifically for Sony APS-C sensor sized cameras, the venerable Sony 50mm F/1.8will allow your Sony DSLR to photograph subjects with razor thin depth of field while rendering a gorgeous out of focus area. Of all the 50mm F/1.8 lenses I’ve tried, this one perhaps has the best build quality to it. Like all 50mm lenses, if you’re able to throw down a bit more money then you can get the Sony 50mm f/1.4 Lensdesigned for full frame DSLRs.

Sony 35mm F/1.8- On an APS-C sensor DSLR it will be around 50mm. Students, hobbyists, street photographers trying to remain incognito, and portrait shooters will come to appreciate the Sony 35mm F/1.8.

Those of you that want to stick with Sony for the long run should strongly consider this lens because the Sony 35mm F/1.4may be out of your price range for a while.

Sony 28mm F/2.8- This is the lens designed for people that want to shoot wider. For the price point, there is little to complain about.

Sony 85mm F/2.8- It’s a pity that Sony doesn’t have an F/1.8 lens in this focal length. However, for the price point (as this is a budget lens compilation) you’ll find that this can be a more affordable option than what the competition has to offer.

Rokinon 8mm f2.8- This is a fast aperture fisheye lens, but the images that we captured with it were some of the best we’ve seen with an NEX camera. Rokinon lenses render color differently than everyone else and because they are manual focus optics, they can focus much more on putting in some top notch glass.

Sony 50mm f1.8 NEX- This is a big one; of any lens made by Sony, the 50mm f1.8 has to be hands down the sharpest optic that we’ve tested for the system thus far. It’s contrasty, sharp, and takes advantage of any Sony NEX sensor to create some beautiful bokeh and images that will leave you bedazzled.

Sony 35mm f1.8 NEX- This a also one of Sony’s sharp optics, but it isn’t as sharp as we originally expected it to be. After some thought though, it made sense as to why it isn’t–and the trade off is that there is image stabilization built into the lens. Generally, when there is stabilization, the image quality can suffer because the elements need to be made smaller for the function to work. But trust us, it’s still very much worth it.

Pentax

Chris Gampat Gear Patrol Pentax K01 product photos (1 of 20)

Pentax 50mm F/1.4- Most Pentax users will know from reading and research around the interwebs that Pentax’s strength lies with their prime lenses. For portrait shooters using their APS-C sized DSLRs (not that Pentax makes a full frame at the time of writing this posting) this will be your ideal focal length because of how flat the lens will render the image when combined with the sensor. The faster aperture of the Pentax 50mm F/1.4will mean that if you have an older DSLR that you won’t always have to raise the ISOs to nuclear meltdown levels.

If I were to recommend one lens to get, this would be it.

Pentax 35mm F/2.4- The Pentax 35mm F/2.4is a lens that will give users an approximate 50mm field of view. As the ultimate street photography lens for APS-C DSLRs at this price point, you’ll perhaps want to set your camera to aperture priority and leave it wide open at F/2.4 in order to capture all you’ll need for your street scenes. Perhaps this is what gives it loads of value at this price.

Pentax 40mm F/2.8 Limited- Pentax’s line of Limited lenses are coveted by all Pentaxians. Having an affordable option in this small package will make you the cool kid on the block amongst your Pentaxian kin. The Pentax DA 40mm f/2.8pancake will be a must-have option for photographers that like to remain discrete or those that always want to keep their cameras on them. Without a larger prime or a bulky zoom lens, you won’t have any excuse to have your camera on you at all.

What other lenses do you recommend?

Please Support the Phoblographer

We love to bring you guys the latest and greatest news and gear related stuff. However, we can’t keep doing that unless we have your continued support. If you would like to purchase any of the items mentioned, please do so by clicking our link and then purchasing the items as we then get a small portion of the sale to help run the website.

  • Pingback: Blog: Les meilleurs objectifs rapport qualité/prix - FredMutter

  • Pingback: Choose The Right Lens For Your First DSLR | Lifehacker Australia

  • Pelopicopito

    when you mentioned examples of uses of a certain Canon lens with X mm focal lenght, you are assuming mounted on a 5D, aren’t you? So I must divide by 1,6 if I have a cropped sensor and want the same result, right?

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      Multiply, not divide.

      • Sam

         - Hi! Love your blog man. Really know your stuff! So i was wondering if you could help me with a small problem i seem to be having. I’m very into scenic photography, especially night shots! I was wondering what len’s would be best for a good wide angle shot and also what lens would be good for a zoomed shot? Any real way to correct the blur that i kinda get from time to time too? I’m using a 60D .

  • Gevon Servo

    I am now own The Nikon 50mm f/1.8D AF & and have owned the Nikon AF-S 35mm F1.8 since i got my camera, the 35 has been my go to lens form my coffee photography as well as for learning composure and low light fun

  • Pingback: How To Choose The Perfect Lens for Your First DLSR « mice scratch

  • RM

    No affordable Pentax primes in the list? That’s because there aren’t any! Angels weep for Pentax…

    (OK, the new 35/2.4 is a start, but it’s still overpriced).

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      Lol.

      • writer

        c´mon there is tamron, and their lenses aren´t bad at all…..

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      Oh look, I see Pentax now ;)

  • Pingback: The Best Budget Camera Lenses [Bestmodo] | Blogging With The Stars

  • http://thefrostedinferno.wordpress.com FrostedInferno

    I really appreciate these kinds of blogs! I’m always looking for options when it comes to budget-lenses. Though, I’m surprised by the lack of anything beyond portrait lensing. Am I missing something? Where are the telephoto and super telephoto recommendations?

    I can think of a few lenses out there that you can get for ~$500 that are great for sports and wildlife, eg my Tamron AF 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC LD Aspherical IF Macro Zoom Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras. Granted, this things aperture is 3.5-6.3, which is nowhere near those 1.8s… but really, what do you expect for a $500 [slightly used?] lens? I think I bought mine for $502 open box never used from Adorama.

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      Hey,

      This was targeted towards people that just want bang for your buck lenses. 85mm on a cropped sensor canon camera is 136mm and so works very well. The lens you talk about is variable aperture though as you say.

  • Pingback: Tamron 18-270 All-In-One « thefrostedinferno

  • Pingback: links for 2010-12-06 « Jet Grrl

  • Pingback: The Best Budget Camera Lenses | Gizmodo Australia

  • Pingback: iHDSLR | Blog | Best Budget Lenses

  • Guyren Howe

    I guess my Sony Alpha isn’t a real camera?

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      This article was written a while back before I even had Sony users reading this site.

      • Zwein

        Will it be updated then?

        • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

          Probably not for a little while. The staff is busy with the K5, E5, 60D, D7000, A55, D3100, lenses apps, and lighting equipment.

          If anything there may perhaps be a part 2 addressing most concerns. But if I were to advise you now, get the minolta 50mm F/1.7

      • Javier Ruiz

        If you’re shooting full-frame, a used Minolta 50mm 1.7 is indeed a great lens. If you’re shooting on a crop sensor, the Sony DT 50mm 1.8 is quite affordable and a good inexpensive lens. The Sony DTs are made out of plastic, but are generally small and light, so they should be fine for a hobbyist.

        For a few bucks more, the new Sony DT 35mm 1.8 is probably a bit more flexible. The 50mm works out to a 75mm on a crop sensor and is really more of a portrait lens. The 35mm is a functional walk-around lens.

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      Updated :)

  • http://beardsleyphoto.com Matt Beardsley

    Another budget Nikon lens, especially for weddings and events, the 80-200mm F/2.8: less than 1/2 the cost of the 70-200mm F/2.8 ED VR II and still sold new from Nikon. I love the new 70-200, but you gotta love $1,100 in the pocket too!

  • Pingback: The Best Budget Camera Lenses [Bestmodo]

  • Pingback: The Best Budget Camera Lenses [Bestmodo] | Best Fap Turbo

  • http://martybugs.net/blog Martin

    Glad to see the Canon EF 35mm f/2 lens mentioned! I bought one recently, and am loving it, as it provides a much more natural focal-length on my 50D crop body than a 50mm lens (35mm is close to a 50mm-equivalent on a 1.6x crop body).

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      Agreed, I love my 35mm F/1.4 L, even though it’s not budget friendly ;)

  • Pingback: The Best Budget Camera Lenses [Bestmodo] | a world news source

  • Mike

    No Pentax primes listed. You can get a canon Nifty Fifty for $100. Pentax? Not so cheap…

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      When I wrote this article, Pentax fans didn’t frequent the blog. It’s only recently that they’ve come in in droves since the 645D hands on.

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      Updated

  • Pingback: The Best Budget Camera Lenses: Gizmodo The Best Budget Camera Lenses | theshuttersquad.com

  • Pingback: Cameras for the Cheap » WPPI Blog

  • Pingback: The Best Budget Camera Lenses

  • Pingback: The Best Budget Camera Lenses [Bestmodo] «

    • Brian

      It’s interesting that the first two Canon lenses I bought for 5D are on this Best Budget Camera Lenses list. I bought the Canon 85mm 1.8 and the 100mm Macro 1.8.

      But I’d like to make other comment …

      In another thread on this site, there was a post which claimed that people ought to get a cheap camera and expensive quality lenses, as opposed to an expensive quality camera and budget lenses. The expensive lens argument claimed that a good pro photographer could do a great job even with a poor camera, but a beginner likely will not and should allow good lenses to make up for their lack of experience and skill.

      I would counter-argue that a beginner should be exposed to diversity so as to be able to choose from experience. And that means having a range of different lenses. And budget lenses would allow that diversity more readily than not, if budget is an issue. And even for the pro, diversity in the tool-kit is desirable. It may be that ultimately, camera diversity might require more than one camera, but certainly, lenses contribute more to that diversity than the camera.

      Some lenses are multi-purpose, the telephotos and for example, the macro-zooms. OK. That can be argued. But that alone does not satisfy the full limit of image diversity via the lens. A standard focus of 50mm is a good starting point, then a wide angle, say 28mm or wider, 14 mm. Going in the other direction toward narrower angle focus, telephotos and zooms. Extreme wide angles (fish-eyes) and tele/zooms greater than 300mm ought to be viewed as specialty lenses as are the tilt-shifts. Macro lenses might also be considered a specialty lens, but … there are lot more occasions to shoot a macro, than fish-eye. And it may well be that if outdoor wildlife photography is a favorite thing, that a 300mm + tele/zoom becomes both a normal need and an expense than must be swallowed.

      Lens Range:

      Bellows/Tilt-Shift Specialty
      Fish-Eye Specialty
      14mm Super Wide Angle
      28mm Wide Angle
      50mm Standard Photo
      85mm -> 300mm Standard Tele-Zoom

      Specialty?
      Macros & Macro-Zooms

      Low-end Specialty
      Microscope w. Camera mount fixture

      High-end Specialty
      300mm + Super Tele-Zoom
      Telescope w. Camera mount fixture

      That’s the diversity range in a nutshell. It is not to say that one tries for the whole set, but surely most will have a standard, a wide angle and a Tele-zoom, possibly compimented with a Macro(-zoom).

      • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

        Hi Brian,

        Ultimately it’s the photographer that creates the photo. However, many people do not want to spend $1,000 or more on Canon L glass. This article was designed for them.

        Another critique of this article was that there were no zooms on this list. Yes, because zooms at the same price range cannot outperform the quality that these lenses can deliver.

        Telling people to experience that multitude isn’t bad advice at all. But there are fairly large chances that those consumers would go ahead and sell those lenses with image quality not quite up to par with their standards.

        My kit comprises of all L glass with the exception of the 85mm F/1.8. Why? Because I love the quality it gives me and cannot justify the purchase of the 85mm F/1.2.

      • Brian

        BTW:

        The budget range is from wide angle (possibly super wide) to 300mm and includes macros.

        Everything else is going to be more expensive.

  • Pingback: Link Roundup: Which Lenses to Buy? | james polits

  • Josh Sterrett

    Thank you for posting this. I’ve just gotten back into my photography hobby after getting a new Canon 550D. However, the Lenses I got in University (2003) have really disappointed me in the quality and I couldn’t figure out how people get such sharp photos while mine always seem to be slightly off focus/etc.

    Well, finally realized it must be the lenses. I’m getting ready to take a round-the-world trip starting in Europe and possibly going into Africa/Middle East/India. For a traveler..especially one that wants to take top quality photos, will these budget lenses perform and is there any special protection equipment I should look at?

    Thanks again for posting this. I’m usually lost when it comes to lenses.

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      Hey Josh,

      I would’ve recommended the 7D to be honest, it’s got a much tougher body. But if you get one of the camera bags here, you should be fine http://thephoblographer.com/2010/11/22/a-holiday-buyers-guide-to-camera-bags/

      Also, these lenses will more than suffice. You won’t get better image quality at that price.

      Thanks for reading, we’d love to see the pictures from your trips. I have to admit that I’m jealous :)

  • Cullen Malone

    Please add a list of recommended Sony SLR lenses

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      We’ll work on it.

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      Done

  • Pingback: 20 Top posts « Oxford School of Photography

  • Craig

    Tokina Lens? Sigma? Or is this an elitist club :D with no 3rd party lenses allowed? LOL!

    I have the sigma 18-250mm and tokina 100mm for my D5000 and they are bang for buck very affordable and decent for those on a shoe string budget.

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      No elitist club at all good sir. At the price point, you’re not going to beat these lenses. Third party lenses tend to have autofocusing issues as well. We’re not saying that those are bad choices, but what we are saying is that for the price point you are absolutely not going to get better image quality.

      Your lenses won’t be able to outdo the 50mm F/1.8 or 35mm F/1.8 at the price.

      • Spoorthy Vemula

        What about a tamron 17-50 f2.8. SUper sharp and only $400. Canon, nikon, and pentax options will cost you hundereds more.

        • Anonymous

          Still can’t beat the primes :)

          -Chris Gampat
          Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
          Twitter.com/ChrisGampat

          • Matt

            What about the Canon 17-55 2.8? Isn’t the IQ on that lens comparable if not better than the 50mm 1.8 and 35mm 2.0 primes? And the 17-55 gives the additional wider focal lengths under 35mm.

            • ChrisGampat

              It’s not budget level.

              - Chris Gampat
              Editor in Chief
              The Phoblographer

              • Matt

                Okay so the 17-55 isn’t a budget level lens. I’m kinda torn between getting the 17-55 or just getting two more prime lenses to accompany my 50mm 1.8, like the 85mm 1.8 and a 35mm 2.0. Getting those two primes would definitely be more cost affective for me. And the extra money could go into a new body.

                Chris, what do you think of the new 40mm 2.8 stm compared to the 35mm 2.0. Does it take the place of the 35mm as a must have budget lens? From what I’ve read so far, it seem to perform pretty well.

                • ChrisGampat

                  28mm may serve you better.

                  - Chris Gampat
                  Editor in Chief
                  The Phoblographer

  • Pingback: Quora

  • http://www.molebomb.com Peter Morgan

    “Nikon AF-S 35mm F1.8- I’ve tried this lens on the Nikon D3x before.” Why bother? It’s a DX lens.

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      I’m aware. You’d be amazed how many people actually put DX lenses on full frame cameras.

      • Hui Wang

        Yes, camera doce have the DX crop mode, but your 35mm becomes to an 50mm, so why bother use a DX lense and a crop mode? Why don’t you just use the 50mm 1.8G on a full frame?

  • Joe

    You’ve got the Sony lenses and wording all mixed up.

    There is a full frame 50 (three hundred) and an APS 50 (cheap, small, telephoto portrait eqv.).

    There is a full frame 35 (over a thousand dollars, big) and an APS 35 (cheap, small, 50 eqv.).

    Please go back, re-read it and re-write it so it makes sense.

    BTW: ALL of these are great lenses! The APS 50 and 35 are really great for the money and work on all of the Sony bodies except the 850+ FF bodies.

    • Chris Gampat

      The only one we had messed up was the 35mm and it has been fixed. Thanks for catching this.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention The Best Budget Lenses at The Phoblographer -- Topsy.com

  • Pingback: The Phoblographer’s Guide to The Right Canon Lens For You at The Phoblographer

  • Pingback: Could This Be the Canon 85mm F/1.2 L II? I Doubt It! at The Phoblographer

  • Pingback: Field Review: Canon T3i (Day 5) at The Phoblographer

  • Rei

    Thank you for this article.
    I pretty sure i’m going to get the Canon 50mm F1.4 for my portrait shot. But i’m really not sure what lens I should take for my street/landscape shot. Please recommend me 2 or 3 lenses that you prefer? Maybe one of your favourite.

  • Spoorthy Vemula

    Why aren’t all the 18-55 lenses on here. For the price you are NOT going to beat those.

    • Chris Gampat

      Sure you will. Some of these lenses are less expensive, sharper and have faster apertures.

  • Spoorthy Vemula

    Another thing that i think is kind of weird is the lack of a wide angle lens. The widest lens metion is 28mm (excluding 4/3 lenses)

  • Pingback: The Phoblographer’s Awesome Guide to Mother’s Day Gifts at The Phoblographer

  • http://twitter.com/fomu Fokko Muller

     Have a look at the Canon 28mm f/2.8 Ideal for street photography and less than 200 Euros

  • http://twitter.com/GONZOCHICAGOGO GONZO CHICAGO

     Hi guys.  I am going to be filming / shooting bands on a 7D.  Would you recommend the Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Autofocus Lens as a good starter lens?  Thanks!!!!  

    • Anonymous

      I’d actually recommend the Canon 28mm F/1.8.

      • zaakir

        or the sigma 30mm 1.4 designed specifically to be a 50mm 1.4 on a aps-c camera

  • Sam

     - Hi! Love your blog man. Really know your stuff! So i was wondering if you could help me with a small problem i seem to be having. I’m very into scenic photography, especially night shots! I was wondering what len’s would be best for a good wide angle shot and also what lens would be good for a zoomed shot? Any real way to correct the blur that i kinda get from time to time too? I’m using a 60D .

  • Pingback: Using Crosswalks For Better Street Photos at The Phoblographer

  • Pingback: Field Review: Rokinon 85mm F/1.4 (Day 1- Ergonomics) at The Phoblographer

  • Pingback: How to Shoot Street Photography with a DSLR at The Phoblographer

  • Pingback: How Faster Lenses Can Save Your Flash’s Battery Life at The Phoblographer

  • Ruhayatx

    Don’t forget manual focus lenses. The EOS system takes virtually any old lens with the appropriate adapter, and there are bargains galore to be had. You can even build up a comprehensive set of Olympus OM Zuiko primes – 24mm, 35mm, 50mm, 100mm – for less than the price of a single Canon 50/1.8. And that’s including the cost of the OM-to-EOS adapter!

    A similar set of old Nikkors come very close. Use the Canon kit zoom lens when you’re in a hurry, and the prime when quality really matters. You’ll save a tonne of money!

    • Anonymous

      Most people going for budget lenses don’t want manual focus. They want quality. However, you do have a point, but as with lenses like the FD series, you lose light stops.

      Chris Gampat,
      Editor in Chief
      The Phoblographer

  • Pingback: The Best Budget Lenses and Accessories for Canon DSLR Users Shooting Video at The Phoblographer

  • Frank77

    For compact point and shoot camera’s the Canon S95 is hard to beat.  It’s under $300 and has RAW and CHDK.  That’s what i would go with.

    http://photography4less.blogspot.com/2012/04/budget-camera.html

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/64PWC2DQIHGSSAL62JLM3EAPOM K.C.

    dont forget the SIGMA 50MM F1.4 ( Canon mount)I use this for my Canons 50D and 7D. NOT a budget lens, it comes in at 500$.

  • JPWG

    If you’re on a budget for any system, forget new and buy used your money will go much further.
    They’ll be forums for every system to help guide your choices but I would also recommend buying to try. If you have checked the used values before buying they are likely to be fairly stable and you should be able buy, use and sell without depreciation in the short term. Indeed sometimes you’ll be able to make a profit.

  • Fou-tography

    Maybe you should update the Pentax to include the 40mm DA XS :)

  • http://www.mattleitholt.com/ Matt Leitholt

    Definitely need to add the 40mm pancake from Canon, that thing is phenomenal

  • kdavis

    howI plan on stepping up my photography in 2013 – Taking more creative photographs and going back to school to learn more about photography

  • http://www.facebook.com/shiv.naimpally Shiv Naimpally

    Good reccomendations for the most part though the Sigma 24mm f1.8 seems to be more expensive than the Lumix 25mm f1.4 ($550 vs $500) so that reccomendation didn’t quite make sense. Also, the Sigma 19mm and 30mm (currently available as a 2 lens set for $199 at BHPhoto) is a real bargain.

  • http://twitter.com/Tdmsu tdmsu

    I would add the Pentax 40mm 2.8 XS… it is cheaper than the Limited, but still a great little pancake.
    Also, consider the Super Takumar 50mm 1.4 – adaptable to nearly any camera, and still produces outstanding results after almost 50 years.

  • Nicolas Cannon

    Best Budget lenses? Old manual ones!!! OM 50mm 1.8f can be picked up for £13 a Nikon E 50mm 1.8f £25 OMmm 50 1.4f £50+ then there’s telephoto lenses by Olympus and a host of others, although all manual, are amazing quality, will give you great pictures and reconnect you with the art of manual photography. Magic lantern can be downloaded, which will give you focus peaking assistance

Previous post:

Next post: