Last Updated on 06/18/2025 by Alberto Lima
“When this review is done, I think I want to pack up all my Canon gear and put it in the closet for a really long time,” I said to myself halfway through this review. I have been a Canon shooter since before I started the Phoblographer 15 years ago. And I’ve seen a lot of reviews of the Canon EOS R5 II online that state one thing or another. They all come from very specific perspectives in our industry. I, however, in nearly every aspect, am the minority and often test things that others don’t. Canon hasn’t really cared about what authentic and accredited journalists have said — even though we’re truly the driving force of what is said anyway. With that said, I’m truly not holding back on this one. This Canon EOS R5 II review tells you the truth that many others aren’t telling you. In many ways, Canon is an alcoholic who went to AA meetings in a pledge to change themselves, but that fell into it again after they got another taste of their own spiked Kool-Aid. To that end, the last few years of the RF mount was all a facade.
In the past year, I’ve tried to approach our industry from a place of holistic love. But the truth is that big manufacturers don’t have the same love for photographers. In this review, the boxing gloves are coming off—and I’m switching them for brass knuckles because I’m so sick of this.
Table of Contents
Declaration of Journalistic Intent
The Phoblographer is one of the last standing dedicated photography publications that speaks to both art and tech in our articles. We put declarations up front in our reviews to adhere to journalistic standards that several publications abide by. These help you understand a lot more about what we do:
- At the time of publishing this review, Canon is not an advertiser with the Phoblographer. In fact, since we brought all advertising efforts in-house in 2020, they haven’t advertised with us.
- Our reviews are constantly updated when new firmware comes out. So please expect updates from us in the future if Canon ever gets us a loaner unit. As it is, most of our product request emails to Canon were met with silence.
- The Phoblographer was not part of the initial all-expenses paid trip to test the Canon EOS R5 II that you saw so many YouTubers, influencers, and very few journalists on. As of a few years ago, The Phoblographer has turned down all press trips as a matter of ethics. As a result, Canon has paid for no part of this review of the Canon EOS R5 II. The exception to this is the long-term loaner units that we’ve had in our offices.
- I’ve been working with Canon for over 15 years. Typically, we get treated a specific way when they don’t like what we’re saying. And we often find it to be a mark against transparent journalism. We’ve called several brands out for this before: a big one that does this is Sigma. Peak Design and WANDRD have also done this in the past to the Phoblographer.
- None of the reviews on the Phoblographer are sponsored. That’s against FTC laws and we adhere to them just the same way that newspapers, magazines, and corporate publications do. Others don’t always make declarations.
- Canon did not loan the EOS R5 II to us. Instead, it was loaned to us free of charge by the editorial program over at Lensrentals. There was no money exchange between Lensrentals and the Phoblographer for this to happen. Manufacturers trust the Phoblographer’s reviews, as they are incredibly blunt.
- Canon knows that they cannot influence the site’s reviews. If we don’t like something or if we have issues with it, we’ll let folks know. We were the first publication to inform about several issues that we’ve seen from Canon before.
- Lensrentals sent the product to Phoblographer in NYC to loan the camera to us. Our home office is based in New York. We’ve long since returned it.
- The Phoblographer’s standards for reviewing products have become much stricter. After having the world’s largest database of real-world lens reviews, we choose not to review anything we don’t find innovative or unique, and in many cases, products that lack weather resistance. We’ve also steered away from Micro Four Thirds and APS-C as they’re dying formats. This is a conclusion that even the other members of TIPA agree on. Unless something is very unique, we probably won’t touch it.
- In recent years, brands have withheld NDA information from us or stopped working with us because they feel they cannot control our coverage. These days, many brands will not give products to the press unless they get favorable coverage. In other situations, we’ve stopped working with several brands for ethical issues. Either way, we report as honestly and rawly as humanity allows.
- At the time of publishing, the Phoblographer is the only photography publication that is a member of Adobe’s Content Authenticity Initiative. We champion human-made art and are frank with our audience. We are also the only photography publication that labels when an image is edited or not.
More can be found on our Disclaimers page.
The Big Picture: Canon EOS R5 II Review Conclusions
The Phoblographer is the last photo website that caters specifically to photographers, and that couldn’t care less about video in cameras like these. If I’m being my authentic self, I think that most of the changes in the Canon EOS R5 II could’ve been firmware updates, or they should’ve been put into the R5C II. A lot of them have to do with video. So I’m going to address what other claims around the web have stated here in my conclusions. Please note; I’m directly calling much of it misinformation and poor inclusivity considerations in camera testing:
- A major autofocus overhaul: This is incorrect. It’s basically working in the same way as the Canon EOS R3. It’s a bit faster than the Canon EOS R5. That means that even with people of color that have a lot of melanin in their skin will be very difficult to autofocus on. I’ve called it racial ignorance in the industry before, and I’m doing it again. If Nikon and Leica can get it right, why can’t Canon? To add to this point, Canon hasn’t always been a very inclusive company, and we previously reported on how Canon Philippines included no women ambassadors.
- Eye Control Autofocus: It’s still really bad, and it’s especially bad for people who wear glasses. For anyone who isn’t aware, this is when Canon’s sensors try to track your eyeball and focus on what they’re viewing through the viewfinder. But there are lots of issues here involving astigmatism, eye shape, etc. You can calibrate it, but that sometimes makes it worse.
- The 45MP Stacked CMOS Sensor: Canon’s image quality has always been good, and I’ve never had a complaint about it. But I also never really saw a major difference in how it performs and affects viewfinder and LCD screen performance.
- 8.5 Stops of image stabilization correction: We didn’t specifically measure this as we only had the unit for two weeks. But in reality, if you’re buying a camera like this, you shouldn’t really need this much image stabilization; you need a tripod.
- Pre-Capture: This was a nice addition that Canon needed very much in their cameras. The R7 has it.
These are the features that I think that real photographers would care about the most. But I’ll also state that they took out the ability to make a multiple exposure in RAW picture mode.
I have a Canon EOS R5 in my office. For a really long time, I used my Leica SL2s along with either this or the Panasonic S5 II as a main camera. Truly, if you’re a photographer, I don’t see a reason to upgrade this camera. My final conclusion and rating of this camera has to do with the fact that this is mostly a four-year-old camera that we reviewed in 2020.
This begs the question of what I would want instead as a photographer. And here’s a great list of requested features:
- Better autofocus on people of color in low light: In 2024, this is completely unacceptable. And other reviewers aren’t talking about it because I’m sure most of them are either trying to maintain a good relationship with Canon or they just don’t work with people of color.
- Returning the Multiple Exposure RAW mode: Canon had this from the Canon 5D Mk III, and they just took it out. This is the worst decision I’ve seen for photographers who want to find ways to differentiate themselves from Generative AI.
- A few more buttons: More buttons around the mount that are programmable could make the camera much more functional
- More Crop Modes: 645, 6×7, 6×9, and panoramic modes would be very welcome.
- Illuminated buttons or Different Textures on Buttons: This makes finding your way around the camera much easier in the dark without needing to use the LCD screen. It’s especially the case because using the LCD screen can drain the battery, so I often have it turned into the camera body to save battery life.
- Higher megapixels: photographers really need them because of the color depth and raw file editing capabilities. Couple this with good high ISO output as well.
- Skin smoothing: With more megapixels comes the need for more skin smoothing.
- Live Composite: We know that Panasonic and OM System have this, but why can’t Canon have something similar?
- Live ND: This is an OM System feature, and I think that with Canon’s color processing, it could be really nice.
- Easier ways to upload styles: Currently if I want to add film styles to Canon cameras, I have to do it through the desktop. I love what Thomas Fransson does, but I’d like it to be easier for me to add these styles to the camera.
- Touchless shutter: Something that Sony demonstrated years ago was the ability to make their cameras shoot a photo just by waving your hand by the eye-sensor. But they never implemented it. This would be a great feature for people who mostly use the LCD screen.
- More consistency in ergonomics with their other cameras: The on/off switch was in the same place for years and then they changed it with this one. Those small things make it really annoying for working photographers.
- Better battery life: Canon’s battery life is the worst it’s been in years. I turn airplane mode on and all, but the battery life isn’t all that great anymore.
- An Online Shop for more In-Camera styles: kind of like Lumix Lab.
- Additional options to add simulated lens imperfections: I’m talking about stuff like lens flare and things like that. Canon tried to push their post-production features, but why can’t they add this?
- Content Authenticity: This is a given in 2024.
We’re giving the Canon EOS R5 II 3/5 stars, and we’re tempted to give it only two stars. This is one of the biggest letdowns I’ve seen from Canon in years.
Pros
- Weather resistance
- Still has the easiest menu system ever
- It still has a good sensor, but it’s not a reason to upgrade to this camera body.
Cons
- They removed in-camera multiple exposure previews and the final image being a RAW file.
- Most of these updates could’ve been firmware updates
- Not sure why they made some of these ergonomic changes from previous cameras that made using them all so simple.
- The battery life drains too quickly now. I never thought I’d say this, but Sony does better now.
- Most of these changes should’ve been for the R5C in the same way that the Sony a7s III is mostly for video shooters.
- Canon made no effort to improve the autofocus on people of color in low light; especially those with melanin in their skin.
- No Content Authenticity Initiative integration
Who Should Buy the Canon EOS R5 II?
Don’t bother. Get the original instead. If you’re shooting video, get the R5C.
Innovations with the Canon EOS R5 II
The Canon EOS R5 II isn’t an innovative camera. It’s basically more or less the Canon EOS R5 with a more annoying ergonomic interface. Specifically, if you’re a photographer, there’s no reason why you’d need to or want to upgrade besides the internal pressure put on you by the marketing machine, influencers, and YouTubers.
And to be very frank, they’re all lying to you when it comes to working with it in real-life situations. Those changes aren’t stark enough, but they look good on paper.
Gear Used for the Canon EOS R5 II Review
The Canon EOS R5 II we tested was a loaner from Lensrentals. We used it with the 100-500mm L, 50mm f1.2 L, and the 24-105mm f4 L. All of these, except for the 50mm f1.2 L, are long term loaner units from Canon. Additionally, we used the Profoto B10, which is our own unit. Finally, we also used Pro Mist Filters, which are our own.
Hardware
I’m going to get this section started with what annoys me the most. To some of you it might be something minor, but to me, it’s not. The on/off switch was moved from the top left to the top right area. Why? For many generations of the camera, it was on the top left. Why couldn’t they keep it there?
Secondly, the new joystick feels like something from a toy of some sort. I really liked the previous one that stuck into your thumb a bit and give you tactile feedback.
And now for what’s good about this camera’s hardware. There are copious buttons that you can set to give you the exact controls you need and want. I still would’ve wanted more though.
Ease of Use
I’m starting off here with saying this: the Canon EOS R5 II mostly feel like a firmware update over the previous camera in some ways.
First off, if you’re a Canon camera user, then know that the menu changes are only slightly heavier. There’s a bit more separation of things and you’ll need to rewire your brain for that. But for the most part, Canon’s menu system is still the simplest to navigate of any of them on the market. The only one that’s almost as good is Panasonic LUMIX. Sony and Nikon still can’t hold a candle the Canon’s overall ease of use.
At one point during this review, a friend reminded me of the fact that Canon’s hot shoes can have issues with previous flashes. Thankfully there are no issues with TTL and the Profoto b10 with the air commander. If there were, then I truly would’ve lost it.
The Canon EOS R5 II makes multiple exposures be JPEGs now. It no longer makes them RAW files – which is what they’ve done since the Canon 5D Mk III. You still get to keep your RAW files that make the images, however. I really don’t like this change. Canon, for years, was the only brand that let me do in-camera multiple exposures while giving me the ability to edit them later if needed from their original merged RAW file. But now? This is complete nonsense. One of the reasons why I use Canon is because of the in-camera multiple exposure option. Otherwise, there are so many other great options on the market.
If I were ever to ask Canon about why they did this, they’d probably say that people didn’t use the feature. But quite honestly, I think that all of the new video features should’ve been given to the R5C instead.
Sony puts all of their highest end video features in the Sony a7s III. Why can’t Canon do the same thing and leave photographers alone?
You’re probably saying, “This is so small of a feature.” But you don’t realize that Generative AI is coming for all of us; and Canon just took away a tool for us to be more versatile in what we can make.
Even worse: the camera doesn’t even give you a preview of what you shot and are layering anymore.
When I’m reviewing this camera at first, firmware 1.01 came in. The major changes for photography with the R5 II could’ve been a firmware update for the original camera.
New firmware 1.01
- Fixes an issue in which movies captured in RAW format may not play back properly on applications due to the attached lens and camera not communicating properly.
- Improves the stability of the touch operation control when the Touch Control is set to Sensitive.
- Fixes an issue in which the camera LCD display may become abnormal after the camera resumes operations from the viewfinder off state.
- Fixes an issue in which the camera may stop working properly when the shutter button is operated while the BUSY message is being displayed on the screen.
- Fixes an issue in which Err70 may be displayed when the display mode is switched between the LCD screen and viewfinder while the BUSY message is being displayed on the screen.
- Fixes an issue in which the camera LCD display may become abnormal after using EOS Utility to capture and import movies.
- Fixes an issue in which movies captured using EOS Utility may not be played back on the camera.
- Optimizes the auto white balance for specific environments when the Custom Picture function is set to ON.
I’m really hurt by these changes as a person who is an accredited journalist in the photo industry and as someone who makes taxable income from photography services. Canon removed the closest thing to the Live Composite feature that Panasonic has and that made it really a dangerous contender.
Also, while it’s better than Sony’s, Canon’s battery life still isn’t what it used to be. Nikon and Leica do a much better job.
In the period of a single event from 10-4pm, I went through two Canon arteries. What the heck man? Really?!
Also, if you put older Canon batteries in, it won’t be able to record video or do network functions. Plus, it won’t even charge via USB-C. This is insane if you’re mixing batteries from older Canon cameras.
While I haven’t been able to find this potential issue anywhere else, and the issue didn’t happen consistently enough for me to reproduce, I did encounter situations where the camera would simply lock up when writing to a card. During my review of the EOS R5 Mark II, I did not use a CFExpress card and only used the SD card slot. When initially testing the Canon R5 II, I was using a SanDisk Extreme Pro card rated for 280mb/s write speeds. This should not have had issues, but lo and behold, the camera locked up on two separate occasions. I have trust issues when it comes to technology, and I immediately took a drive to the nearest Best Buy in hopes of picking up another card, just in case. After swapping cards, the issue seemed to have been resolved.
In firmware version 1.0.3, Canon addressed the following:
1. Optimizes the timing of the camera’s display of its internal camera temperature warning indicator.
2. Fixes an issue that may interfere with the camera’s ability to focus properly when using AF (autofocus) in certain zoom ranges.
The latter of the two fixes was something that was coming up in forums and rumor sites, though we did not encounter it in our testing.
During my review period, I encountered a potential issue that I haven’t been able to find anywhere else. Even more puzzling, the issue didn’t happen consistently enough for me to reproduce. The issue I encountered was that there were situations where the camera would simply lock up when writing to a card. During my review of the EOS R5 Mark II, I did not use a CFExpress card and only used the SD card slot. When initially testing the Canon R5 II, I was using a SanDisk Extreme Pro card rated for 280mb/s write speeds. This should not have had issues, but lo and behold, the camera locked up on two separate occasions. I have trust issues when it comes to technology, and I immediately took a drive to the nearest Best Buy in hopes of picking up another card, just in case. After swapping cards, the issue seemed to have been resolved.
Focusing
First off, Canon has finally made it really easy to switch through the various scene detection modes. It took them way too long in my opinion.
While doing my multiple exposure test, the Canon EOS R5 II couldn’t always focus on a moving train while at 24mm and f11. You might say that that’s the issue, but it was in the early part of sunset. That shouldn’t happen. However, I also needed to have the exposure preview effect on. This, indeed, is when pretty much every camera on the market isn’t at its best – and I’ve been preaching this for years.
During a daytime event and with the exposure preview turned off, the Canon EOS R5 II perhaps missed focus only a handful of times. That goes for photographing people and animals both. Of course, it was tougher to get the focus with birds at times. But everything that I’ve shot is acceptable in my mind.
Notably, it also worked well with people of color that have melanin in their skin. But when low light situations came around, the story changed. Canon is still pretty awful about this. And as a person of color, it’s quite degrading to use their products at times in low light.
Autofocusing JUNE 2025 UPDATE:
As part of this review update, I used the Canon EOS R5 Mark II as the sole camera on a job capturing a high school graduation. For the graduation ceremony, I used the Canon EOS R5 II and the Canon RF70- 200 mm F2.8 L IS UCM Z, shooting across the entirety of the zoom range. During my testing, I found the combination to be solid, quickly locking focus and finding my intended subject. Even in the rather terrible lighting of the event space, the Canon R5 II not only managed to acquire focus easily, but it was also able to hold focus even with a moving subject at a distance.
Additionally, my clients on this assignment are people of color; in our initial review, we found that the EOS R5 II at times struggled with focusing on more melanated subjects, and I’m pleased to find that this time around, the R5 II performed better. Throughout my test period, I found that the R5 II got a lot more keepers than not. That’s saying something after a really bad experience with the much pricier R1.
U
u
u
Canon EOS R5 II Image Quality
There’s good news here: you can pull a lot of information from the shadows and highlights when editing. Also, the color seems a tad muted. But when it comes to working with the high ISO files and the RAW files, I don’t see a major difference between the original Canon EOS R5 and this. With that said, there isn’t a really great reason to need to upgrade.
My images in this review were:
- Shot while trying to get creative with the in-camera multiple exposure mode, but then realizing that they don’t do RAW files anymore for the final image.
- Playing with bird photography
- A photo gig
- Exploring my neighborhood at night
Extra Image Samples
From day one, The Phoblographer has been huge on transparency with our audience. Nothing from this review is sponsored. Further, lots of folks will post reviews and show lots of editing in the photos. The problem then becomes that anyone and everyone can do the same thing. They’re not showing what the lens can do. So we have a section in our Extra Image Samples area to show edited and unedited photos. From this, you can make a decision for yourself.
Unedited
Edited
Canon EOS R5 II Tech Specs
These specs are taken from the Lensrentals listing:
| Brand | Canon |
| Camera Mount | Canon RF |
| Camera Type | Mirrorless |
| Category | Photo |
| Environmental | Operating Temperature32 to 104°F / 0 to 40°C85%Operating Humidity |
| Exposure Control | Shutter TypeMechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter1/32000 to 30 Seconds1/8000 to 30 Seconds1/8000 to 30 SecondsBulb ModeShutter Speed – Electronic ShutterShutter Speed – Electronic Front Curtain ShutterShutter Speed – Mechanical ShutterBulb/Time ModeISO Sensitivity Range – Photo100 to 51,200 (Extended: 50 to 102,400)Center-Weighted Average, Evaluative, Partial, SpotAperture Priority, Auto, Manual, Program, Shutter Priority-3 to +3 EV (1/3, 1/2 EV Steps)-3 to 20 EVAuto, Cloudy, Color Temperature, Custom, Daylight, Flash, Fluorescent (White), Shade, TungstenUp to 30 fps at 45 MP for up to 200 Frames (JPEG) / 93 Frames (RAW)Up to 12 fps at 45 MP for up to 760 Frames (JPEG) / 230 Frames (RAW)Yes2/10-Second DelayMetering MethodsExposure ModesExposure CompensationMetering RangeWhite-Balance PresetsContinuous Shooting – Electronic ShutterContinuous Shooting – Mechanical ShutterInterval RecordingSelf-Timer |
| Flash | Built-In Flash/LightNo1/200 Second1/160 Second-3 to +3 EV (1/3, 1/2 EV Steps)eTTLShoe MountMaximum Sync Speed – Mechanical ShutterMaximum Sync Speed – Electronic ShutterFlash CompensationDedicated Flash SystemExternal Flash Connection |
| Focus | Focus TypeAuto and Manual FocusContinuous-Servo AF, Manual Focus, One-Shot AF, Single-Servo AFPhase Detection: 1053Phase Detection: 975-7.5 to +21 EVFocus ModesAutofocus Points – PhotoAutofocus Points – VideoAutofocus Sensitivity |
| General | Battery Type1x LP-E6P Rechargeable Lithium-Ion1x LP-E6NH Rechargeable Lithium-Ion (with limitations)1x LP-E6N Rechargeable Lithium-Ion (with limitations)1x Hot Shoe1x 1/4″-20 Female (Bottom)Magnesium Alloy5.45 × 3.87 × 3.48″ / 13.84 × 9.83 × 8.84 cmShoe MountTripod Mounting ThreadMaterial of ConstructionDimensions (W x H x D)Weight1.5 lb. / 670 g (With Battery, Recording Media)1.3 lb. / 588 g (Body Only) |
| Imaging | Lens MountCanon RFSensor ResolutionActual: 50.3 MegapixelEffective: 45 Megapixel36 × 24mm (Full-Frame) BSI Stacked CMOSImage SensorSensor Crop (35mm Equivalent)Crop Factor: 1xAdditional Modes: 1.6xAdditional Crop Occurs in Select Video ModesSensor-Shift, 5-AxisNoStills & VideoImage StabilizationBuilt-In ND FilterCapture Type |
| Interface | Media/Memory Card SlotsSlot 1: CFexpress Type B (CFexpress 2.0) [2 TB Maximum / VPG-400 or Faster Recommended]Slot 2: SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II) [V90 or Faster Recommended]1x HDMI (Unspecified Signal) OutputVideo I/OAudio I/O1x 1/8″ / 3.5mm TRS Stereo Microphone Input on Camera Body1x 1/8″ / 3.5mm TRS Stereo Headphone Output on Camera Body1x USB-C (5VDC at 1.5 A) InputPower I/OOther I/O1x USB-C (USB 3.2 / 3.1 Gen 2) Data Input/Output (Shared with Power Input)1x Canon N3 Control Input1x PC Sync Socket FlashSync2.4 / 5 / 6 GHz Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Bluetooth 5.0WirelessMobile App CompatibleYes: Android & iOSApp Name: Canon Camera ConnectFunctionality: Access Stored Files, Adjust Settings, Firmware Update, Remote Control, View Live FeedGlobal Positioning (GPS, GLONASS, etc.)GPS, via Connected Smartphone |
| Item Type | Camera |
| Mfr. Model Number | 6536C002 |
| Monitor | Size3.2″Articulating Touchscreen LCD2,100,000 DotTop: Status DisplayTypeResolutionSecondary Display |
| Mount | Canon RF |
| Still Image Capture | Image Sizes – 3:2 HEIF / JPEG / RAW44.8 MP (8192 × 5464)24 MP (6000 × 4000)17.3 MP (5088 × 3392)11.6 MP (4176 × 2784)3.8 MP (2400 × 1600)Image Sizes – 1:1 HEIF / JPEG29.8 MP (5456 × 5456)16 MP (4000 × 4000)7.8 MP (2784 × 2784)2.6 MP (1600 × 1600)Image Sizes – 4:3 HEIF / JPEG39.8 MP (7280 × 5464)21.3 MP (5328 × 4000)10.3 MP (3172 × 2784)3.4 MP (2112 × 1600)Image Sizes – 16:9 HEIF / JPEG37.7 MP (8192 × 4608)20.2 MP (6000 × 3386)9.8 MP (4176 × 2344)3.2 MP (2400 × 1344)1:1, 3:2, 4:3, 16:9HEIF, JPEG, RAW14-BitAspect RatiosImage File FormatsBit Depth |
| Video Capture | Internal Recording Modes – RAW 12-BitDCI 8K (8192 × 4320) at 23.98/24.00/25/29.97/50/59.94 fpsDCI 4K (4096 × 2160) at 23.98/24.00/25/29.97/50/59.94 fpsInternal Recording Modes – H.264/MP4/XF-AVC S/XF-HEVC S 4:2:2/4:2:0 8/10-BitDCI 8K (8192 × 4320) at 23.98/24.00/25/29.97 fpsUHD 8K (7680 × 4320) at 23.98/25/29.97 fpsDCI 4K (4096 × 2160) at 23.98/24.00/25/29.97/50/59.94/100/120 fpsUHD 4K (3840 × 2160) at 23.98/25/29.97/50/59.94/100/120 fpsDCI 2K (2048 × 1080) at 23.98/24.00/25/29.97/50/59.94/100/120/200/240 fps1920 × 1080 at 23.98/25/29.97/50/59.94/100/120/200/240 fpsExternal Recording Modes – 4:2:2 10-Bit via HDMIDCI 4K (4096 × 2160) up to 59.94 fpsUHD 4K (3840 × 2160) up to 59.94 fpsSlow-Motion OnlyCanon Log 2, Canon Log 3, HDR-HLG, HDR-PQ, Rec709, Rec2020NoNoMonoFast-/Slow-Motion SupportGamma CurveRecording LimitIP StreamingBuilt-In MicrophoneAudio Recording2-Channel 16-Bit 48 kHz AAC Audio4-Channel 24-Bit 48 kHz LPCM Audio |
| Viewfinder | TypeBuilt-In Electronic (OLED)0.5″5,760,000 Dot24mm100%Approx. 0.76x-4 to +2SizeResolutionEye PointCoverageMagnificationDiopter Adjustment |
