When I was done reviewing the Leica 35mm f1.2 APO for Leica M mount, I was yearning for more. I hadn’t looked so adoringly at photos like that in a very long time. So like any other photographer with GAS that needs to be vented, I went around the web searching. The quest brought me the path of the TTArtisan 35mm f2 APO. So I called one in for review. When I tell you that this is the lens that led me to question everything, I’m really, really not kidding you.
Table of Contents
Chinese Lenses Aren’t Cheap. Everything Else is Just Expensive
Every now and again, Reviews Editor Alberto Lima will pop by my office for a visit where we get some work done and we manage camera gear loans. We did an imformal comparison between the TTArtisan 35mm f2 APO and the Leica 28mm f2 APO SL which I own and adore. Anyone who owns Leica lenses will tell you that the SL APO lenses have the most visible effect on the image. However, both Alberto and I found in our investigation that the TTArtisan was delivering very similar results.
For background, one of the things that has made Leica so untouchable for years is part of the mystique of the Leica look. That look is often delivered with lenses that seem almost impossibly small compared to most other camera manufacturers. But when they aren’t all that small, they still deliver really big on the image quality. This is due in some small way to their Apochromatic lens designs — which boost micro-contrast into fooling the eyes to believe that f2 depth of field is actually that of an f1.4 lens. And it does this in a way while still keeping an f2 aperture as opposed to something like the Sony 100mm f2.8 Smooth Transition Focus G Master Lens (reviewed here.)

Few lens makers have been able to do this: Laowa, Zeiss, and Sigma are some of the exceptions here.
But here I was with a lens that costs around $470 that’s, delivering images that can nearly rival a $5,000 lens. Let alone, the Leica M-mount variant we reviewed here is closer to the $10,000 price point. Put a different way, a $5,000 lens is delivering images that a $470 can make.
I’ve stated many times before that Chinese lenses aren’t cheap, it’s just that everything else is very expensive. And sure, Leica delivers a lifetime warranty of some sort and provides support to products going way back. In the case of the SL lenses, there’s also autofocus and durability meant to match the IP-rated standard that their cameras are held to. But is it really worth that much?
And so things got even more complicated.
I Can’t Tell the Difference

The TTArtisan 35mm f2 APO has a metal build on the outside. It’s designed for Leica M mount, and so it doesn’t have any weather resistance. But it’s built just like many other Leica M-mount lens. There’s a screw-on metal hood, clicky apertures, smooth focusing, and it’s cold to the touch. It is also big enough to sort of get in the way of the Leica M6’s viewfinder. I’ve come to expect this with rangefinders, though.
But here’s the thing: in a blind test, I don’t think anyone would be able to tell the difference between which lens is a Leica and which is made by TTArtisan just by feeling alone. Mind you, this is a statement coming from a legally blind man who’s been testing cameras for far longer than most of the YouTubers out there and also even most journalists reviewing cameras.
And here’s where things got even more complicated.
The $470 Lens that Makes Images Like a $9,000 Lens
A few quick journalistic declarations before I go on, the brand provided the TTArtisan 35mm f2 APO for keeps. I tested it on a Leica M6 and a Panasonic S1R II — both of which I own and purchased with my own money. The film is Flic Film Chrome 100, which is sold by the wonderful Blue Moon Camera company. I purchased the film from them for full price. It is one of the only other positive films available on the market right now beyond what the big two film manufacturers make. Blue Moon Camera developed the film free of charge, which is a service the Phoblographer negotiated with Blue Moon many years ago. I genuinely get all my film gear from them, I recommend that you check them out at this link here. They’re bound to be better than your local analog shop.
I tell you all this because I take a great amount of care in being transparent with the Phoblographer’s audience.
For most of this review, I photographed with the TTArtisan 35mm f2 APO on the Leica M6 as I exposed various rolls of Flic Film. But during the waiting period for it to come back from the lab, I tried it on the LUMIX S1R II. It delivered beautiful images — but so too does every single lens on the market.
That’s something that I really couldn’t believe that I was saying.
I’m not one to pixel peep, as I think that it’s a pedantic thing that camera manufacturers and old men hold onto to justify why something is much better than the other. That idea is as practical as looking at a pizza that my local mom-and-pop shop just gave me and complaining that a single pepperoni sliver didn’t get all that crispy. Seriously, imagine if the pizza industry went around saying, “We get our pepperoni crispy in the center and crispy in the corners.” It would not only be pedantic, but it would also be assinine because you’d eat the damn slice if you were hungry enough, no matter what.
That’s the truth about the TTArtisan 35mm f2 APO. When you look at the whole image, you can’t tell the differences.
Here are a bunch of images that haven’t been edited. These were made with the Leica M6 on Flic Film 100.
Here are a bunch of photos that were edited in Capture One using the Phoblographer’s presets. These are with the Panasonic LUMIX S1R II.
Can you tell that these images were made with a Chinese lens? I can’t. Nor can I tell that they weren’t made with a Japanese lens or a German lens. Genuinely, we’re not a point of diminishing returns. We’re in the era of needing critical rethinking of the lenses that we buy.
In 2026, I’m really questioning every single product that comes out now.




























































