Last Updated on 07/27/2017 by Chris Gampat
Before I get very deeply into this piece, this post isn’t a personal attack on DXOMark, DPReview, Imaging Resource, or any of the sites that do some sort of lab testing. They run a legitimate business that in some ways puts camera and lens testing into a format that is mathematically easier for lots of people to determine for themselves. But if you’re a photographer who has been working in this industry for a while and has developed a set of skills that allows you to create beautiful photos no matter what piece of gear you’re using, then it technically won’t matter if you’re using a Canon 5D Mk II or a Sony a9 as long as you can think creatively and capture or create a jaw dropping photo.
And with that statement I will begin my very pointed opinion.
And even then, who defines what better is? Years ago, I had this conversation with a friend who is a tech journalist and works at a larger brand, and to them it has nothing to do with art. Unfortunately, most of the world doesn’t understand art the way we understand science. Heck, our (meaning human beings) ancestors knocked down artistic statues but stole scientific research. Of course, they didn’t care about the art and beauty of the culture.
For the rest of us though, we can consider a lot of this to be very clinical. Oddly enough, though I fell out of love with Canon lenses years ago, I started to like them again recently because of the character they deliver. It isn’t clinical or doesn’t seem like it was specifically designed to satisfy DXOMark or other lab test organizations. The lenses seem like they were designed for photographers and less so for engineers. In fact, lots of vintage glass does too. Interestingly enough, Zeiss glass is my favorite because it tends to combine the best of both worlds. I can get absolutely beautiful lens flare that simply isn’t possible with Sigma glass or Sony glass. And in fact, I’ve been asking engineers for years to add more lens flare.