Extended First Impressions: Sony RX-1

by Chris Gampat on 10/19/2012

When the camera was first announced, we were able to post our first impressions of the Sony RX-1. It was bashed by man for the exorbitant price. During the recent Sony media excursion, we were able to play with the camera for an extended period of time. As a photographer with a street photography, photojournalistic, and wedding background, I can tell you that I have fallen in love with the Sony RX-1 despite the high price tag and fixed focal length prime lens. There is absolutely nothing like it on the market, and there is very little bad to say about the camera.

But before I continue, I must mention that all journalists (including myself) were all given near final samples of the camera. Also be sure to check out our three way high ISO comparison against the Sony A99 and Canon 5D Mk II. If that interests you, you can check Amazon and B&H Photo for availability.

 

 

Gear Used

The Sony RX1 was used with the Electronic Viewfinder and the lens hood.

Autofocusing

I am not going to be the first one to tell you that the Sony RX-1 autofocusing is actually a bit sluggish. Some journalists found it best to just use the center autofocus point and just recompose. As most of you know, I don’t do that because I feel that it throws off the plane of focus too much.

Instead, I actually opted for manually focusing the camera. In order to do this, you need so switch the front lever to the MF mode. Once that is done, it’s just a matter of moving the right ring around the lens. There are three rings around it: aperture, focusing, and focus limiting. Once you acquire the muscle memory, manually focusing with the Sony RX1 is an absolute wonder. It’s like putting a Voigtlander lens on a Micro Four Thirds camera body except that the focus peaking on the Sony RX1 is really, really good.

If I were to purchase the camera, I would much prefer to just use the manual focusing instead of the AF. When coupled with the lens hood and the EVF for the RX1, holding the camera is almost reminiscent to my days of using a Leica CL. But this time, it is with a fixed lens.

For the street photographer looking for quick captures of scenes, you may need to look elsewhere unless you stop down and live with the, “F8 and be there” rule. Indeed, I really wished that Sony had put a depth of field scale on the lens for me to figure out how far away I am focusing and how much is in focus for zone-style shooting.

However, it isn’t impossible to become a master of focusing with the camera.

Update: The AF is about on par with the Fujifilm X100 with the latest firmware update in terms of speed. Where the RX1 still lacks (along with other cameras from Sony) is smartly picking which object I want in focus based on the composition of my scene. Hence, another reason why I spring for manual focus.

Ease of Use

Using the Sony RX-1 was incredibly simple to do. First off, there are two major control dials for exposure in manual mode: which is what I set the camera to for a majority of my time. The fact that one dial is around the lens and the other is at the top right hand corner of the back of the camera makes using the RX-1 reminiscent of using an old Nikon SLR from the film days. In practice, it really just works.

To access the ISO setting, I often just pressed the Fn button on the back and then scrolled through the settings accordingly. Of course, Fn can control more than one variable if you set it to. To that end, it opens up its own little menu system.

The only usage issue with this is that in order to best take advantage of the Fn button on the back, you need to remove the viewfinder from your eye. I would have preferred an ISO dial the way that Canon has with its higher end G series of compact cameras.

Additionally, I wouldn’t have minded if the camera were a bit larger to accommodate to the larger size. In fact, journalists and I talked with Sony’s reps about making the camera have an interchangeable lens mount. Sony took the side that the camera would need to be considerably larger in order to do that; and that the lens already goes very deep into the body.

My response: bring it on. If it needs to be the size of Leica’s rangefinders or Fujifilm’s X Pro 1, I’m all for it. Smaller isn’t always better, but the RX1 sure did pull it off very nicely.

One of the best things about using the RX1 though was just how well the major controls were placed. It made shooting a joy and I was able to just find my scene, mentally meter it, lift the camera to my eye, set my exposure, and click: I was able to capture a moment. It was decisive, it was lovely, and it made me extremely nostalgic on top of yearning for more.

Ergonomics

Overall, the ergonomics on the camera were not only attractive, but it made me keep reaching for it probably more than any other camera except for perhaps the A99.

Image Quality

I’m going to let the images speak for itself here. I shot these in RAW + JPEG, but at the moment only JPEGs are supported in Lightroom. I did a tiny bit of editing, and here is what I came back with.

Skin tones from the camera were wonderful!

High ISO Output

I didn’t shoot much at high ISOs, but this photo was taken at ISO 6400. Pretty damned good in my opinion; even against the A99 and 5D Mk II.

Conclusions So Far

The Sony RX-1 is very impressive. Sure, it’s expensive; but let’s think about it: no one else is doing this except for Leica and those are around three times the price of this camera. For what it’s worth, the Sony Rx-1 is justified at its price. My only problems so far with the camera are that I believe it should have a built-in EVF, the autofocus is a bit sluggish, and I want a depth of field scale around the lens.

We will be receiving a review unit sooner or later, so stay tuned for the full review to come.

You can check Amazon and B&H Photo for availability.

Please Support The Phoblographer

We love to bring you guys the latest and greatest news and gear related stuff. However, we can’t keep doing that unless we have your continued support. If you would like to purchase any of the items mentioned, please do so by clicking our links first and then purchasing the items as we then get a small portion of the sale to help run the website.

Also, please follow us on FacebookFlickr and Twitter.

  • Pingback: The Complete, Continuously Updated Sony RX1 Review File | THEME

  • Luis

    When you write “I haven’t fallen in love with the Sony RX1″ (beginning of the article), did you really mean that or is it a typo and you meant that you HAVE fallen in love with it?

    I still think that this camera could have been done to cost less than half of its price, but if Sony decided to do it this way I guess they know better. Time will tell.

    • Michael Watkins

      I was just about to post the same question because it reads like a typo.

      Another question I have is regarding autofocus performance. I believe Steve Huff felt it was faster than some other currently popular compact cameras (Fujifilm X series come to mind including the X100 which is quite slow) but not as fast as a good DSLR (understood). Would you characterize AF performance that way?

      • ChrisGampat

        I’m going to correct that right now.

        I didn’t notice any major difference between the RX1 and the X100 with the latest firmware update. Fujifilm did a good job improving the AF when I tested it later on with the wide angle adapter.

        Where the RX1 still struggles is smartly and correctly picking what I want in focus based on my composition of the scene.

        *-Chris Gampat*
        Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
        Twitter.com/Phoblographer
        Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

    • http://byazrov.com/ Vladimir Byazrov Photographer

      Sony always does some very bad thing to photo market. I call it a rotten marketing. They put a higher price tag at first and then in a super short time they seriously lower the price few times, devaluing the purchase for many, making it very hard to compete for other brands but also making those nice cameras to be some regretful purchases for consumers. Sony maybe is creating some good stuff these days, but marketing wise they get no respect from me. Nobody wants a new Sony camera that in two month will be 20% cheaper and in another few months could be two or more times cheaper. Fck that!

      • ChrisGampat

        Canon and Nikon do the same thing; plus the previous two offer rebates more often.

        *-Chris Gampat*
        Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
        Twitter.com/Phoblographer
        Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

  • Mike Aubrey

    I’m torn on this one. The idea is incredibly attractive and I really, really want to love the camera. But I have no idea where it would fit in my system. My OM-D already does so well. And given the alternative between this awesome little guy and buying, say, the Voigtlander 17.5mm f/.95, the Voigtlander is a cheaper alternative, where I’d only really be sacrificing high ISO abilities that I don’t use anyway. Well, that and the two stops of ISO that Iose on the OM-D are made up with f/.95 on the Voigtlander.

    Okay, I’d loose on lens size, too…but I can remove the lens in any case.

    If I was a fountain of cash, I’d be all over the RX-1.

    • http://twitter.com/richmack06 Richard Reed

      Mike, it sounds like you answered your own question. IMO, the OM-D is the 1st m4/3 camera that shows the promise of that system. I think we all get a little too caught up in the new gear that gets rolled out which somehow makes our gear inferior or obsolete– a marketer’s dream. I don’t assume what you use your gear for, but I’ve got to imagine that you take some great photos with the gear you have.

    • Just Passed By

      Because you are not their target customer..It’s just that simple. You just answer your own question.

  • simon

    Why is Sony really holding off on the full frame NEX?

    • Michael Watkins

      The simplest answer may be the right one – they never anticipated NEX to be a success at the higher end, it was envisioned as a consumer grade camera. It wasn’t designed with larger sensors in mind. It can support the larger image circle – see the handy-cam VG900 – but look at the size and contortions (lens, lens adapter) you need to get that to work.

      If you want a full frame NEX-styled compact body with compact lenses, a new line of lenses has to be developed or a thicker compact needs to be used or both.

  • Pingback: A new first impression review on Sony RX-1 - Micro Four Thirds Camera Blog

  • Andy

    Hi Chris

    What was the “shutter lag” performance on the Rx1? I have an x100 now and really enjoy the camera but lack of MF and shutter lag my two gripes with the camera.

    Seriously considering ordering one (and sell the x100) but will wait for more reviews to come out.

    thanks

    Andy

    • ChrisGampat

      Not significant enough to prevent you from getting awesome street shots.
      - Chris Gampat
      Editor in Chief
      The Phoblographer

  • Pingback: A99 shipping at Digitalrev. New A99, RX1 and NEX-6 and new E-mount lens tests! | sonyalpharumors

  • ScottRhee

    I was thinking that almost all of sample shots from Sony RX1 (not ones here) were just from stabilised objects, which made me guess that the AF was not fast enough. I think it’s turned out true by your review. I understand MF can make a difference and sometimes produces better outputs but.. personally I need good AF performance as I am looking for a snap-machine with better image quality & smaller body size. So I am disappointed again – I don’t know when my journey ends for the ideal snap machine. Possibly many guys will say “RX100″ is that but it’s still not enough for me. So it’s time for me to grab a sluggish SLR camera again.

    Thanks for the detailed information which I’ve been looking for!

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/ndjedinak Nate Jedinak

    You like those skin tones? Did the people really look like vampires in person? I think skin tones are a major weakness (along with poor jpeg engines) of Sony’s processing… Personally, I find Sony’s a bit cool, including this one. Of course, this can be tweaked to your hearts’s desire in post.

    The AF comment has me worried (I have this one preordered), especially since my other camera is the much maligned X-Pro 1! But I could live with really good MF for the intended use of the camera. Hopefully Sony provides a nice on-screen DoF scale like the X-Pro (only accurate, please!).

  • ponyman

    I think Mr Gampat has just destroyed my dream :(

    • raf

      Agree…the sluggish autofocus is a big issue. I couldn’t live with X100 and Xpro1 and I guess I’ll have to cancel my pre-order. what a shame…really wanted this to work and be that 1 special camera.

  • deepstare

    “Some journalists found it best to just use the center autofocus point and just recompose. As most of you know, I don’t do that because I feel that it throws off the plane of focus too much.”

    What an asinine comment

    Guess you’ve never shot with a Leica…

  • pixelpunch

    Hey Mr Gampat, can you comment on this: http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3335727#forum-post-50280164

    Is it indeed true that peaking is only working when paired with manual focus magnification?

    • ChrisGampat

      That’s totally wrong. Peaking works with or without magnification. That would make no sense.

      *Chris Gampat*
      Editor in Chief
      The Phoblographer
      Check us out on Twitter and Facebook

  • http://www.facebook.com/ekusujapan Brandon Ng

    Hi, recently I went to the Sony Showroom in Tokyo, Ginza and I realized the focus peaking was implemented in quite a flawed way as compared the the NEX line of cameras. Focus peaking just only worked on the RX1 in the showroom only if the camera was in magnification manual focus assist mode, unlike how it is implemented on the NEX line of cameras.
    http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/post/50280086

    Having seen that you’ve used the RX1 quite extensively, I wonder if focus peaking worked for the unit you tested even if magnification assist was disabled.

    • ChrisGampat

      It did.

      Magnification doesn’t need to be enabled for peaking to work.

      *Chris Gampat*
      Editor in Chief
      The Phoblographer
      Check us out on Twitter and Facebook

  • aaa

    I think your photos with manual focus are definitely out of focus and not good.

  • Pingback: Always a Reason to Celebrate: Sony Days 2012 - Cyber-shot Series | illuminate!

Previous post:

Next post: