The Phoblographer

Photography: Think Simpler

Review Update: Olympus EP3 (Raw File Test)

with 13 comments

When we reviewed the Olympus EP3 (or EP-3 and E-P3), the raw files weren’t editable in Adobe Lightroom 3. With the release of the latest update, they are. We’ve already seen that the camera does a great job so far and it truly one of our favorites, but has Olympus really learned their lesson with the Micro Four Thirds sensor output?

Before we go on, this is an update to not only our full review but also to our comparison of raw files.

Color Depth

As we’ve seen in the review, the color depth of the Olympus EP3 is really quite good. In fact, it has never been a problem for most users. When I spent some time editing the raw files, I remembered just how vibrant the colors could be. Typically though, this really only stood true for the more prominent colors in the image. In the image above, I was able to tweak the vibrancy in Lightroom to make the more subtle colors stand out. The result is a better image than the original below. Note that it was also color corrected.

For color depth, the Olympus EP3 still gets a very high recommendation. When looking at the output, the colors almost reminded me a bit of Kodak Portra.

Dynamic Range

In this RAW test, I tried to see how much detail could be recovered from the highlights. Clearly, they’ve been blown out in the above example. With some tweaking in Lightroom 3, you get the results below.

With this test, one can see that a significant amount of detail can be recovered from the Olympus EP3′s files. For more dynamic range tests, you should check out the full review.

High ISO

The above image was shot at ISO 6400 with the Olympus EP3. As you can also see, there is quite a bit of noise. So let’s see what will happen when we crop into the man sleeping and then try to edit for noise and detail.

Here’s the crop, as you can see, this s one noisy image.

This is my best attempt at trying to quell the noise. When you’re looking at the image this close up, you start to realize that it’s not that bad at all. In fact, it has performed better than I thought it would.

With all this said, it must be mentioned that there has been some loss of fine detail but to be fair, most people won’t view your image this close up.

In fact, most images at 6400 ISO look fairly good as they are. The above image wasn’t processed for noise, though it could use it in the blue sky and the pink bag.

And at ISO 1600, like in this photo above, you really have nothing to worry about at all.

Vs the Canon 7D and 5D Mk II

These files were done with the same images as this test. These files below were not edited in any way, but were instead resized down to 2000 pixels on the long end for your viewing pleasure. Take a look at the results and see for yourself.

Olympus EP3 raw file test

Canon 5D Mk II Raw file test

Canon 7D Raw File Test

More Image Quality Samples

Conclusion

So is the Olympus EP3′s raw files up to par with modern cameras? For the most part, yes. The Dynamic Range and Color Depth are indeed really, really good. The High ISO output is also better than it was previously. However, the camera still cannot match even the Canon 7D with straight out of camera noise reduction. If you can embrace the art filters to mask this, or are a good photo editor, then this won’t be such a problem (so stop complaining about it.)

However, this is just a test of image quality with the Olympus EP3. We’ve done so many more tests with the camera to proof that it is quite amazing to use.

You can see all of B&H Photo’s prices on the EP3 here or you can check it out on Amazon.

Please Support The Phoblographer

We love to bring you guys the latest and greatest news and gear related stuff. However, we can’t keep doing that unless we have your continued support. If you would like to purchase any of the items mentioned, please do so by clicking our links first and then purchasing the items as we then get a small portion of the sale to help run the website.

Also, please follow us on FacebookFlickr and Twitter.

 

Related posts:

  1. RAW File Test: Olympus EPL-2
  2. Which One: Olympus EP-3, EPL-3 or Pen Mini?
  3. Olympus EP3 is Available for Pre-Order (Black with 14-42mm only)
  4. Canon 5D Mk II vs Olympus EP-2: Studio Review
  5. Shooting Street Photography with the Olympus EP3

Written by Chris Gampat

August 28th, 2011 at 12:58 am

  • Tomh

    Hi Chris, I recently purchased a E-P3. In i-Auto mode,the ISO is around 1000-2000 in the daytime outside on sunny days. Is this normal? I was very surprised after seeing the pictures on my computer with lots of noise.

    • Anonymous

      Hi Tom,

      I’ve never shot in Auto mode, so I’m not sure. Switch to Program and lower the ISO settings. Plus you’re not telling me your shutter speeds, apertures, or what lens you’re using.

      Chris Gampat,
      Editor in Chief
      The Phoblographer

  • Joe Aguirre84

    adobe is only showing the raw 6.4.1 update??? i cant find the lightroom update also 

    • Anonymous

      Download Lightroom 3.5.

      Chris Gampat,
      Editor in Chief
      The Phoblographer

  • Pingback: Review: Olympus EP-3 (and 12mm F/2) at The Phoblographer

  • Pingback: Review Update: Olympus EP3 (Raw File Test) | shootplex

  • Pingback: New Oympus E-PL3/E-P3 and Panasonic GF3 reviews « b r e a k m e l o d y

  • Pingback: Raw File Comparison: Olympus EP3 vs Sony NEX C3 at The Phoblographer

  • http://www.randalford.com Randal

    What camera strap are you using?  It’s looks great with the EP3.

  • Pingback: Which One? Olympus EPM1 vs Olympus EP2 Comparison Review at The Phoblographer

  • Carlos

    It’s understandable that the E-P3 cannot match a Canon 7D or 5D Mk II. There are huge differences between the cameras: sensor size, overall size, purpose, and price.
    A fairer comparison to an E-P3 would be a Sony NEX (ASP-C), Samsung NX (ASP-C), Panasonic G (MFT), Nikon V(something in between compact and MFT), since they are also compact interchangeable system cameras with similar price and package size. Noise-wise, all current MFT cameras fall short against almost all current APS sensors because of their smaller sensor size; however, because of the smaller sensor size, MFT cameras can be more versatile and compact. 

    • Anonymous

      I believe you may have missed the point. It was to see how far the technology has come. For example, a D7000 has better high iso results than the original 5D mk II.

      Chris Gampat,
      Editor in Chief
      The Phoblographer