Battle of the Flagships: Olympus E-5, Pentax K5, Canon 7D, Nikon D300s: Which is Better?

by Chris Gampat on 02/10/2011

This is it: the moment you’ve been waiting for if you’ve been trying to figure out which camera to purchase or which one is best for you. After completing long, exhaustive testing of the Pentax K-5, Canon 7D, Nikon D300s and Olympus E-5, we are proud to announce the battle of the flagships shootout. Let’s go!

Editor’s Note: This is a joint posting written by Editor in Chief Chris Gampat and Lead Analyst Matt Beardsley.

Complete Postings for Reference

Olympus E-5


The Complete E-5 Review- I talked a bit more in the complete review about how I used the camera to shoot in the snow for my job.

Hands on at Photo Plus

Day 1- The E-5 impressed me quite a bit early on and I was hoping that it wouldn’t let me down.

Day 2- I took the camera out during a snowstorm in NYC and found that the image quality was very, very good: especially the blues, reds, and greens.

Day 3- Buried under snow for a period of time, the Olympus E-5 survived Hell’s Kitchen. This proved just how tough the camera is.

Day 4- Played with the Art Filters, which proved the camera to be a fun companion if it is indeed your only body.

Day 5- Using the Olympus E-5 with the FL-50r flash to photograph products in a small whitebox. I also tested the high ISOs: which were perhaps the only flaw of this camera with the lack of dynamic range.

Pentax K-5


The Complete Pentax K-5 Review- Matt gave his overall stamp of approval on the camera.

Day 1, Specs, Ergonomics, and Button Layout

Day 2, Customization, Image Quality, and a landscape shoot in the rain

Day 3, Wedding Photography, and Low Light Performance

Day 4, An Engagement Shoot with the K-5

Day 5, Night Photography, Image Quality, and Stabilization

A Quick Look at Pentax K-5 Video

Canon 7D


The Complete 7D Review

Night 1- The camera and two prime lenses documented a Jewish Seder during the week of Passover. It performed very well and users of this camera may be asked to actually join a family at dinner and document the happenings as they progress throughout the night.

Day 2- The 7D and 24-105mm F4 L IS went to the giant pillow fight in Union Square. While the FPS kept up, the autofocus couldn’t quite capture the quickly moving combatants at varying distances and at such as fast speed too. But it did withstand the punishment of elbows, heads, shoulders and pillows knocking it about.  When the autofocus did work correctly, it captured some wonderful images. If you’re getting into a warzone like this, perhaps you’re better off with a 1D Mk IV.

With the Sun Sniper Camera Strap- This strap has replaced the Canon strap on my 7D as it typically holds my longer lenses during events and it’s also the camera I go to when I need to quickly capture something. Along with the 5D Mk II, I’ve run into nothing that the combined two can’t tackle.

Day 3- Testing at a get-together of NYC gaming journalists at a bar. Autofocus was fine in the dim light and mostly stagnant people. As was the high ISO ability shooting at ISO 3200 and above. All photos were shot in JPEG for truly showing the noise levels.

On the Set of a Podcast- The 7D performed much better in terms of manipulation vs the T2i. Noise levels in movie mode seemed to be the same.

Nikon D300s


The Complete Nikon D300s Review

This isn’t as fully detailed as the Canon review for the reason that this is around the time that the Field Reviews were just starting and didn’t start to evolve into the long and thorough discussions that they became. Admittedly though, much more time was spent with the D300s but enough time was spent with the D300s to make complete conclusions about the camera.

With that said though, I do remember nearly everything about that camera.

Bonus Round: 7D vs the D300s in shooting concerts and in a full on long term test.

Ergonomics


Make no mistake, all of these camera bodies feel very different. The button layout is different and when using one camera and then going to another, your brain will need to rewire itself to get used to using them with your eye not leaving the viewfinder.

Olympus E-5: Hands down, the best grip of each of these cameras. My only quirk was that I used it for a month and my brain was never able to totally rewire itself to not leaving the viewfinder to change the settings.

Pentax K-5: I had hands-on with this camera back at Photo Plus. It felt damned good and Matt had no major qualms with it during the testing.  It’s sturdy and rubbery, compact but comfortable, with nicely customize-able controls.

Canon 7D: In all fairness, the Canon 7D has spent the longest time with me because I own one. Every Nikon owner I know loves it because it feels like a Nikon. Ergonomically, I have no problems with it but felt that it was such a strong deviation away from the 5D Mk II that my brain needed to work through the various changes. With that said though, it was the easiest to learn to use without having my eye leave the viewfinder.

Nikon D300s: No questions asked, this was the simplest camera to use of all the ones mentioned here previously. A big congratulations goes out to Nikon for creating a real photographer’s camera in terms of ergonomic build. I was able to learn how to shoot without having my eye leave the viewfinder very quickly, it felt very good with any lens attached to it, and using it was a simple pleasure. It constantly stayed at my side and was even a pleasure to carry around when shooting for fun.

Winner: Nikon D300s

Autofocus

This is the year I feel that every company pulled out all the guns in terms of autofocusing abilities. Each of these cameras performs very well in terms of autofocusing. All of these cameras were paired with top of the line glass from each manufacturer.

Olympus E-5: Very quick and very smart. Just be sure that you don’t keep it in Continuous AF mode if you don’t need it. Otherwise it will constantly hunt for moving targets (almost like it is a heat-seeking missile or something.)

Pentax K-5: When I tested the camera, the focusing was speedy even in low-light situations. It tracks well, has a nice range of points, though it feels a little behind the game compared to the competition.

Canon 7D: I’ve never had a major problem with the focusing on this camera. By far though, it is the most advanced of the bunch with Spot focusing, point focusing, cross type focusing and zone focusing throughout the entire range of focusing points.

Nikon D300s: Simple, accurate, speedy, and reliable. I can’t fault the focusing on this camera but I do think that after setting the standard in the industry for an amazing autofocus system that it is about time that Nikon takes another step forward.

Winner: Olympus E-5 for speed and smarts, but the Canon 7D has the most versatile and advanced AF system of the bunch.

Build Quality


None of these cameras can be faulted. They are all tough, but some are tougher than others.

Olympus E-5: Buried this camera under snow for a while and then took it out to me to document the snowstorm that NYC had. More of this is detailed in the complete review.

Pentax K-5: Matt shot with this camera out in the rain and it survived quite a bit of punishment while still performing very well.  It is well-sealed and built like a little brick. Only the slightly less-impressively sound exposure mode dial keeps it from feeling like the most solid here.

Canon 7D: This camera has been bumped around like crazy. It still keeps clicking, but I admittedly haven’t shot in the snow with it. I shot in the snow with the 5D Mk II though. Judging from the better sealing on the 7D, I can conclude that it would survive the snow, but probably wouldn’t survive the torture that the E-5 suffered.

Nikon D300s: Though this camera feels great and was bumped quite a number of times, it never suffered violent abuse.

Winner: Olympus E-5 (damned good job Olympus.)

Ease of Use

Some DSLRs are easier to use than others, but there is a good reason for this. Manufacturers try to cram in as many features as they can to create a product that will stand out from the others. Unfortunately, it isn’t always user friendly. With that said:

Olympus E-5: Most difficult to use in terms of remembering where the buttons were, but the best menu I’ve seen. The back LCD panel displays so much information and it is very easy to read. It reminds me of the days of when Sony actually had simple menus.

Pentax K-5: Similar to the E-5, but the display and layout is a bit more complicated and it doesn’t totally work with the way that the average human eye reads information. It has a huge range of features, which is nice, but it also feels a little too complicated.

Canon 7D: This is a very advanced camera and you’re better off not paying attention to the LCD screen at all. As an alternative, use the top LCD screen or keep your eye in the viewfinder.

Nikon D300s: The D300s is still very much the Nikon D300 with very minor tweaks. With this said, the simplicity of this camera will be very appealing to many users that want a professional camera with an easy to use interface.

Winner: Nikon D300s

Image Quality

This one is going to be a bit tricky for a number of reasons. The E-5 has a Four Thirds sensor while the Canon 7D has a 1.6x APS-C sensor and the D300s and K-5 have a 1.5x crop sensor. Take a look at the chart below.

Olympus E-5: The punchiest colors by far, but the worst dynamic range. This was a major disappointment for me as I’m a former Olympus user.

Pentax K-5: Earlier on, we reported a bit on the sensor performance of this camera. Wonderful dynamic range with very good color depth. However, there is a fringing issue that Matt makes note of often as well as stains as of the time of writing this.

Please also note that he went through two different versions of the 55mm F/1.4 DA Limited.

Canon 7D: Despite the same report stating that the 7D doesn’t have as great a dynamic range as the K-5, I almost beg to differ. While it can’t touch my 5D Mk II, it still is very decent and the two compliment each other well (especially at weddings.)

However, I’d love more color depth and dynamic range.

Nikon D300s: You really can’t find a problem with this camera when paired with good glass. In my tests though, I didn’t find the dynamic range to be as good as I’d expect. I also felt that the ISO performance needed to be stepped up. More on this in the next section.

Winner: Pentax K-5 (if they fix the sensor issue, otherwise this goes to the Canon 7D when coupled with L glass)

High ISOs

 

This is the thing that scares so many photographers and enthusiasts. If the noise looks film-like, then it’s okay. If there is terrible color banding and other issues though, then we shriek and cover our eyes in horror.

Olympus E-5: Dear Olympus, please switch to an 8MP or 5MP sensor and remarket your cameras towards those that shoot mainly with the intention of shooting for the web. The noise levels on the E-5 above ISO 1600 were nearly unacceptable.

Pentax K-5: In Matt’s head to head high ISO test, the Pentax K-5 confidently beat the Nikon D7000. Note that the D7000 is a lower-level camera than the Nikon D300s. The K-5 has the highest reaching ISO of the bunch, and an awesome range, with perhaps a bit too much in-camera noise reduction (which smooths away a bit too much detail).

Canon 7D: Admittedly, I’ll say that I wish the 7D has better High ISO performance but for the most part, ISO 6400 is usable enough to the point where I shoot at it often during low-light situations.

Nikon D300s: The D300s performs superbly at high ISOs, though I wish that it natively went up to ISO 6400. This forces us to purchase the creme de la creme of the Nikon glass, which is extremely pricey.

Winner: This is a tough one: I want to give it to the Pentax K-5, but there are so many issues with the sensor, so it is going to the Canon 7D. Otherwise, it would have been easily awarded to the Pentax K-5. The D300s wasn’t a major upgrade over the D300; and don’t even talk to me about the E-5′s High ISO performance.

HD Video Quality

This doesn’t need a major run through for the reason that the Canon 7D is what it used by many HDSLR cinematographers, it is on the set of Saturday Night Live, and has helped to flip the HD video industry on its head.

Winner: Canon 7D

Conclusions

The overall winner of this competition will go to the Pentax K-5 when Pentax finally fixes the sensor issues. At the moment though, it is being handed to the Canon 7D. Nikon has almost bastardized the D300s with the release of the D7000 and by only giving it very minor upgrades over the D300. The Olympus E-5 would have won this if it had a greater dynamic range and the high ISO performance wasn’t so terrible.

Questions? Thoughts? Let us know in the comments below.

You Can Purchase These Cameras at:

Pentax K-5: B&H or Amazon

Olympus E-5: B&H or Amazon

Canon 7D: B&H or Amazon

Nikon D300s: B&H or Amazon

Please Support The Phoblographer

We love to bring you guys the latest and greatest news and gear related stuff. However, we can’t keep doing that unless we have your continued support. If you would like to purchase any of the items mentioned, please do so by clicking our links first and then purchasing the items as we then get a small portion of the sale to help run the website.

Also, please follow us on FacebookFlickr and Twitter.

  • James

    As always, great article, but I’m a little confused on two things.

    In the 7D vs D300s for concerts article you said that you would choose the Nikon for concert photography because of its AF system…

    “The AF system just works so well and I feel that Canon still has some catching up to do.”

    In that same article, the edge was also given to the D300s in terms of high ISO…

    “Both cameras are capable of delivering very clean images even though the D300s just beats out the 7D due to the 12MP sensor.”

    I can understand why one would want a 7D over a D300s (preference for Canon glass, vastly superior video, higher resolution for cropping, etc.), but I’m not understanding what caused the change in opinion on ISO and AF in particular.

    • Chris Gampat

      Good question and I knew this was coming. The 7D is more versatile in terms of types of AF. Additionally, editing the high ISO files feels easier to me with Canon vs Nikon. My knowledge of color theory actually starts to make sense when doing this.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Battle of the Flagships: Olympus E-5, Pentax K5, Canon 7D, Nikon D300s: Which is Better? at The Phoblographer -- Topsy.com

  • http://Aradilon.wordpress.com Koen Miseur

    But why did u even use the D300s, it isn’t their flagship anymore, the D7000 is worlds better and cheaper, maybe u should include that camera.

    • Chris Gampat

      The D300s is still their flagship.

      No questions asked.

      • Spoorthy Vemula

        Really? The D7000 has better ergonomics, hands down better IQ, and better metering. All the d300s has is better build.

  • confuseus

    This is a confused article and comparison. There is no real consistency btwn the previous individual reviews of the various cameras and then this final “shootout” roundup. There is also seeming inconsistency within the roundup itself. Perhaps the approach was changed mid stream, but the thought processes seem at best, muddled. If i were a consumer desiring to purchase a new DSLR, I’m really not sure what I’d be able to take from this roundup. I think I would get a clearer picture (pun!) from the individual reviews, though now in the context of this roundup, I am drawn to question the objectivity or at least veracity of the individual reviews.

    • Chris Gampat

      What are you confused about, maybe we can help?

  • http://www.diyfilm.co.uk/ John

    “Nikon has almost bastardized the D300s with the release of the D7000 and by only giving it very minor upgrades over the D300.”

    But that’s because the D7000 isn’t a replacement for the D300 or D300s – both of which still have features that the D7000 lacks (Sync socket & 10-pin terminal, 51AF points and 8fps for a start). The D7000 is a replacement for the D90, and over that it’s a huge upgrade.

    But, that aside, my personal opinion is for stills, I’m perfectly happy with my D300s, love it, wouldn’t replace it with a D7000, but I’ll happily get rid when the D400 comes out. :)

    For video, 7D, no contest.

    • Chris Gampat

      Agreed John. However, there is no denying that the D7000 is a great camera and that everyone and their mother wants one instead of the D300s.

      It’s funny, I feel that when the D700 successor comes out that people will say that the D700 is crap. Meanwhile, pros will still be able to shoot rockin’ images with it.

  • Robert Bridgens

    How is the 7D ( or Noink D300s for that matter) considered a flagship model?

    Surely the respective flagships are the 1DmkIV and the D3x? The 7D & D300s are middle of the range prosumer models.

    • Chris Gampat

      They’re the flagships of the APS-C cameras.

  • HM

    Olympus has talked alot about the weaker AA filter and Trupic V+ engine thing. Did you find the resoulution and detail to be good enough to hang with the higher MP bodies?

    • Chris Gampat

      Couldn’t touch my 7D but it was about the same as the D300s.

  • FINI

    really great comparison! however i would take a closer look to the k-5′s hd video quality. the settings are bad to adjust, but she comes with a very solid codec (75mbit/s), a brilliant shake reduction function, zebras, great low-light performance, tough body and so many cheap lenses to go. i love the colors and the sharpness she takes.

    for example:
    http://vimeo.com/17551733
    http://vimeo.com/18779835

    don’t judge cause only few people use that cam for this area. its a new one… not many knows her quality! :)

  • Dingenus

    Why not shoot your lowlight portret with a 14-54 or 14-35 on 3.5 and iso1250 instead of 4.5 and iso2500.
    There will be enough dof and no noiseproblem. This was the idea behind 4/3 if I remember well.A stop more dof as APSc, lenses usable wide open. If you not use that benefits of 4/3 there is no comparison between equivalent camera settings. In this way there is only a comparision with other camsettings that are not equivalent.

    • Chris Gampat

      It’s actually a stop less because of the smaller sensor. Smaller sensors = less shallow images at a particular F-stop.

    • Rickey

      Too many reviewers belittle a camera with a lower ISO…. With a great lens its really not that important…….. The field is even….. cept the Oly is as tough as granite

      • Chris Gampat

        Totally not true.

        Shooting with the D700 and 5D Mk II I can tell you that even with fast/good glass, you sometimes need to crank up the ISOs and a tripod cannot often be taken with you.

        I’m not sure what you shoot but try concerts, weddings, and parties.

        • Rickeyg

          I would expect more from those cameras as they cost significantly more than the E5. For the most part I do not use a tripod for weddings or parties. I find the Oly IS works well here, I often go to a shutter of 50 and up, but yes indeed, the Iso often needs to go up to help match ambient and unless you crop heavily the Oly 800 – 1600 is VG. The fast glass and equivalent DOF at lower apeture means working at lower ISO values. Noise reduction is controlled in Camera and in computer with post processing of course so. For me, Oly Bodys and Glass at the price point they exist, are my choice, as I appreciate others have their choice.

          • Spoorthy Vemula

            even at low iso, the e-5 is way worse than tese other apsc camera, espcially in d-range, and color depth

  • Dingenus

    No, 4/3 has one stop more DOF as APSC at the same diaphragma. So F4 has the same dof as 5.6 on APSC.Comparision should be F4-1250iso against 5.6 -2500iso. Light gathering and dof are the same this way.

    • Chris Gampat

      Yes you’re right I misread you.

  • Ben

    Agree with Dingenus. With Olympus lenses such as the 14-35 f2, or 35-100 f2, I can shoot tack sharp images wide open, which will be a stop lower ISO than the Pentax, Canon and Nikon, negating any noise advantage by the other bodies. And regarding resolution, a major review site lists the E-5′s resolution at 2600 lp/ph (in jpeg mode no less), and the 7D at 2500 lp/ph in raw. And this is with 6 fewer megapixels than the 7D.

  • Charles

    Getdpi.com also has a good thread talking about the E-5 and it’s performance. Worth the read. Most people who own the E-5 say it’s usable at 3200 though.

    Didn’t find the article all that useful though. The comments often talk about different issues of the cameras so you can’t even really compare in a single category. The comments were really based on the tester’s preferences, but not enough context given to know how it would work for me.

    • Chris Gampat

      So does that mean you didn’t find this useful information? We try very hard to tailor the content to be useful to you guys.

  • http://www.brandonjdoza.com Brandon Doza

    You say the auto-focus of the 7D couldn’t keep up with the pillow fight, but you said you were using an F/4 lens. Canon specifically states the full potential of the 7D’s auto-focus can’t be had without an F/2.8 of faster lens. IMO I think that part of the review could use a re-working with a faster lens. Great review overall though.

    • Chris Gampat

      This is true, its partially resolved in the concert test.

  • Daniel

    Regarding the E-5. It needs to be seen as a whole system, and that includes lenses. There are Zuiko lenses that can be shot wide open at F/2 with absolutely stunning, tack sharp results. So many other lenses simply fail to achieve this, and as such need to be stopped down. Why have high ISO performance when the lenses can be used wide open.

    • Chris Gampat

      Agreed, but if you look at it as a whole system then Canon and Nikon overrun it.

  • Kenneth

    Regarding the sensor issue, Pentax already admitted with the stain and will replace the ones affected. So i guess the award is for K-5 now.

  • Alex

    I have two things i wish to add as a bit experienced Pentax user:

    #1. Thing You called “frigging” is properly named LoCA (Longitudinal Chromatic Aberrations). It is a kind of chromatic aberrations that happens to fast lenses wide open out of the focal plane (more distance to plane – bigger LoCA value will be). Anyway is something that depends on lens, not a camera body. And it is very hard to remove in postprocess (in fact almost impossible). It depends on lens bulid.

    #2. When you enable in camera body JPG with CA/geometry correction it will greatly slow down camera`s CPU. That is not easy work and 16 Mpix is a lot to process and it will take some seconds. That was problem U experienced. Just disalble it in menu and camera`s speed will be fine.

    • Chris Gampat

      You mean, “fringing.”

      Also, we used a great lens in this review: the 55mm limited.

  • gebarn

    Glad to see Pentax getting their due. Pentax has been the “Apple Computer” of the Camera world for many years. Not the cheapest, Not marketed to the masses, Not sold at Walmart, Staples, or Costco. Quietly giving us new, solid, and unique features & great pictures at a great price. I had a Pentax in 1975 and I still use my old college days lens today. When you see a guy with a Pentax, you know its a photographer, not just another green button snapshot yuppie.

  • Pingback: Field Review: Olympus EPL-2 (Day 2) at The Phoblographer

  • peter

    Appreciated, yet a little on the biased side. All very good cameras. The only place I would clearly disagree is in the high ISO test. I’ve read many other reviews and reviewed many image test, and the K-5 is always the winner.

    • Chris Gampat

      As we’ve stated many other times before, ISOs these days from MOST cameras are so good when used in combination with Lightroom 3 that the issue is almost negligible.

      I may take some flak for saying this, but if you’re shooting JPEG and complaining about these problems, you need to shoot RAW.

  • Chris K.

    Nice comparisons but question,
    You say that Nikon is more of a photography tool than Canon which I disagree, then explain to me from previous Nikon shooters that switched to the 5D II, example Jerry Ghionis said after he tested out the 5D II he has never looked back, also Joe Buissink jumped ship over to Canon,, and Yervont. There is a reason why all pro’s shoot Canon and it is not just the 21mp.

    • Chris Gampat

      You’re right, but which one is better for shooting videos?

      • Chris K.

        Canon is better for videos but I am talking about stills though, I will also say that Nikon is great for weddings also just look at Cliff Mautner’s pictures he is a fantastic photographer,, You know I have a question for you I have the 5D II and love it but I also like Pentax and was thinking of buying the K-5 as I don’t see canon doing anything with their new sensors, you think it might be smart to wait and see what the 7D II upgrade is like? I have all L lenses and when the 5D III is released I will sell the 5D II and buy that if it’s worth it, also from what I have seen on the Internet is the k-5 for some reason competes really good with the 5D II and don’t see how that can be… thanks;)

        • Chris Gampat

          I describe Canon as more elegant and simple than Nikon. But Nikon’s ergonomics have their strengths.

          You know, you don’t have to sell your 5D Mk II. You can still create great images with it, even if the Mk III comes out.

          Pentax’s sensor and weather sealing is better. However, I recommend you stick with Canon because of the universal accessory and lens support. Pentax cameras are good, but Canon L glass can blow Pentax’s out of the water.

        • Chris K.

          Ya I have the EF 100 2.8 IS L, EF 70-200 IS L II, EF 24-105 IS L and EF 16-35 2.8 L II,, it was just a thought about Pentax I have been shooting with Canon since 1995 and will stay with them, but I kind of want a crop camera due to the extra reach for BIF that way if I put a 2x converter on my 70-200 on a crop it will be close to a 640mm lens;)

          • Chris Gampat

            I’ve had no major problems that my 7D couldn’t handle. And you’ve got some serious glass too. My 35mm F/1.4 L often lives on the 7D.

        • Chris K.

          I loved my 7D as well but sold it and am waiting for their next camera,, also am thinking of selling the 24-105 and maybe buy the new 24-70 2.8,, also I have been hearing many problems with the K-5 in forums of focusing issues and so on,, also that it takes like what 10 sec for the image to write on the card lol.

          • Chris Gampat

            Why not the original 5D then?

        • Chris K.

          Well because I really want 1 crop for the longer reach as stated above;)

  • Rickey

    The Olympus E5, with the 35 – 100 f2 and image stabilization is the best system I have ever had. If I need to rely on ISO 3200 with this baby, I don’t need a camera, I need a flashlight.

    Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and for me, the Oly, with all its perks, kicks em’ all to the corner

  • Bhairav

    Chris, I take objection to your statement that Canon L glass will blow Pentax glass out of the water. Check out the FA31 / FA43 / FA77 and DA*60-250, just to name a few.

    • Chris Gampat

      That’s your opinion and I respect it. I’ve never seen anything except for Leica glass, Hasselblad lenses, and some Nikkor primes beat Canon L.

  • Lawrence Baker

    Chris Gampat gives the game away; whenever his beloved Canon is threatened he springs to the rescue and gives the award to Canon! Don’t you realize Chris that this tells us that you recognize that Canon has dropped off the pace, that your defence of Canon shows that deep down you believe Canon to need a little help. However, your loyalty is unquestioned!

    Photozone’s tests have numerous lenses including Pentax that blow L glass out of the water. Have a look at the Sigma 8-16mm, you will learn that the closest L glass is way behind.

    • Chris Gampat

      Where did you learn to read?

  • TK

     The K-5 sensor stain issue is a thing of the past. Why aren’t you updating your results?
    The stains were the only issue with the sensor, BTW. I’m perplexed by the statement “…there are so many issues with the sensor”.If you are serious about helping users to make a decision you should update the comments and results.

    • Anonymous

      We haven’t had the K-5 back in for a proper run-through again. However, I
      stated at the end that once those issues are resolved then it will be all
      good. As you know, they have been.

      To be quite honest, I believe that is more than good enough considering what
      I know is coming and what is about to be updated.

      -Chris Gampat
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/ChrisGampat

      • TK

        Why do you need a K-5 back? You know how a stain-free sensor performs and you know that the latest batchs of K-5s have been stain free.

        I don’t get why you don’t change the ranking but leave in the “ifs and buts” that are completely irrelevant know. An update is just a few minutes of editor usage away.

        What do you know what is coming and updated? Not sure about the relevance for this comparison?

      • TK

        Why do you need a K-5 back? You know how a stain-free sensor performs and you know that the latest batchs of K-5s have been stain free.

        I don’t get why you don’t change the ranking but leave in the “ifs and buts” that are completely irrelevant know. An update is just a few minutes of editor usage away.

        What do you know what is coming and updated? Not sure about the relevance for this comparison?

        • Thyler

          Still no updates??

          • Anonymous

            I’m going to reinforce my point about how we need the camera back to do the editing and testing again.

            The tester was Matt Beardsley, who has been removed from staff a while ago.
            We’re not going to sit there and blindly say something without testing it. What kind of a site does that?

            -Chris Gampat
            Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
            Twitter.com/ChrisGampat
            Chrisgampat.tumblr.com

            • Anonymous

              Just bought a K5 after shooting 50k shots with a K7 in a little over a year. The sensor prob is related to a small number of K5′s from the first batch. The K5 is amazing and the DxO lab test confirm this. Please keep the Canon marked as best in the review so I can continue to get great deals on lenses on e-bay as well as buying a second K5 body.

  • Spoorthy Vemula

    I think the k-5 has the best image quality by far, especially with sensor stains a problem of the past. And its build is the 2nd best next to the E-5. The user interface IMO is the easiest to use for an expeirenced photographer, since it doesnt have ton of buttons, but just buttons for important thing like, EV compensation, and ISO. The menues are a different story. I think that the k-5 is the easy winner here

  • Greekmom33

    Pairing my E-5 with my 50mm macro, my 14-35 swd or my 35-100  has the best image quality in low lit churches with no flash and definitely is unbeatable in regular lighting conditions.  Somehow the photos with the Olympus equipment is noticed to be more acceptable( has that photo punch)  from my clients vs Nikon and Canon.  I am unfamiliar with Pentex products. 

    • Chris Gampat

      Can we see some photos please?

    • http://flashtestdummy.com/ Flash Testdummy

      I see published photos of Canon along side my E5′s.  My colors always look right using the (built-in) wireless flash feature of the E5.  I have seen some shots with more expensive Canon’s and if that’s an indication of auto-white balance, I’d never give up my E5.  And the 35-100mm F2.0 lens by Zuiko?  What does it cost to get something like that on a Canon or Nikon?  The double DOF I get is very important for dance photos.  Both people generally should be in focus.  Especially when I use my FL50R’s more as fill in flash, than principle scene lighting.  Shooting at F2.0 gives me a SUPER fast cycle time for my MULTIPLE flashes, along with fantastically sharp images.  Except for the weight (around 10 lbs total) of my triple flash rig, I don’t have to think about the flashes until the batteries are low.  I’d hate to think about what a Canon/Nikon rig like that would cost and WEIGH!

  • http://www.facebook.com/richard.tammar Richard Tammar

    What… no Sony Alpha 900? You’d have to prize mine from my cold, dead hands ;-)

    • Anonymous

      This post was written long before the A77 was announced.

      We’re going to update it next year. The reason why is because that’s most likely when all of these products will be refreshed. Hold tight, it’s on our agenda.

      *-Chris Gampat*
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer
      The Phoblographer on Google +
      The Phoblographer on Tumblr

  • Imtek

    I so much wanted to buy a canon 7 D but after looking at 100o’s of photo’s I would have to say that only about 1 out of every 10 are any good the rest are either out of focus or very soft is this a problem with this camera of which all reviews have over looked or is there just a lot of people not using the new focusing properly for I would still like to buy one but very much hesitant at the moment can someone prove me wrong pls.  

    • ChrisGampat

      Where are you looking at these photos? There are thousands out there that are not soft or out of focus.

      Either way, that is a problem fixed with microadjustment in the camera. But it is best done on prime lenses.

      -Chris Gampat
      Editor in Chief
      The Phoblographer

Previous post:

Next post: