Maybe it’s because I haven’t made images with Ektachrome since I reviewed it back in 2018 and even then I’ve got the memories of how it was back in 2012 — but this is a story about a rare time that I’ve been completely fooled. The other day, Gear Editor Feroz Khan and I were on our Thursday call. He asked about why no one else makes positive/chrome film. That eventually lead me to Blue Moon Camera’s website. And there, I found Flic Film Chrome 100. It’s a film emulsion that is spooled by a company in Alberta, Canada. Their website states that it’s respooled Ektachrome 100. In fact, I made photographs with both it and Kodacolor 100 and the images looked so similar.
As a quick aside: you should really give credit to Flic Film because they use content credentials with their images posted on their website. Additionally, we’re giving a big thanks to Blue Moon camera for developing this film free of charge for us. They do a wonderful job and I think everyone should buy from them.
Considering that Flic Film Chrome 100 is indeed respooled Ektachrome, you’d make photographs with it in just the same way. Photographers who know how to get the exposures perfectly right in-camera won’t have any issues here. When I say, “right” I mean that you won’t need to do any post-production at all. Do you know how to do that?
It’s a skill — and it’s something that requires foresight instead of figuring it out later.
Flic Film Chrome 100 delivers really sharp image quality as well as deep colors and an overall really daylight-balanced look. It’s the real thing. I’ve got Ektachrome profiles loaded onto my Nikon D850 and Nikon Zf that look kind of like Ektachrome but they failed to really encapsulate the full feeling.
In March 2026 when I’m writing this review, I’m struggling to figure out what else to say about Flic Film Chrome 100 — which is essentially Ektachrome 100. In my 2016 Ektachrome review, I doubted that most people would use it for serious work because they couldn’t be assured the ease of editing that digital allows. But the truth is that the NYTimes and others hire film photographers all the time. And if you’re skilled enough of a photographer, you can absolutely make this film rock when documenting or creating images.
I’m going to quote from my original review:
The general rule for lots of photographers has been to underexpose their Kodak Ektachrome by around a stop. This can surely work in most brightly lit situations, but again I think that this film truly excels in situations where you have very even lighting. With that said, this film is best:
- In studios
- With a Graduated ND filter
- In overcast situations
- With a flash
- Shot in the shadows with very even lighting
Velvia often looks much warmer. And if you’re into a warmer look, you may want to get Fujifilm Velvia 100 instead — if you can get your hands on some.
But really and truly, this is film. It rewards patience, experience, and knowledge. It’s very much the antithesis of a modern Sony camera.
And for that, I love it.















































