Creating a Black and White Image That Doesn’t Feel Lazy

Creating a black and white image that isn’t lazy requires you to do a lot more to it than just hit the “convert to black and white” option when editing an image and it even requires more than just applying a filter. Conversions are one of the more looked down on ways to edit because photographers believe it to be cheap and easy–yet clients love it!

So how do you create one that doesn’t feel cheap, lazy, and that genuinely looks good? One way includes creating an image that looks good in color and black and white.

The Image Edits

Chris Gampat The Phoblographer Less Lazy Black and White of Bec in color (1 of 1)ISO 4001-50 sec

Before I sit here and eat my words, the lead image of this story looks like the above photo when rendered in color. Depending on your taste, you’ll like one or the other. I like both–but ever since I founded La Noir Image I’ve been on more of a black and white spree.

Chris Gampat The Phoblographer Less Lazy Black and White of Bec in color with grain (1 of 1)ISO 4001-50 sec

Now here’s that image with lots of grain added to it to further embrace the look of black and white. Not bad, huh? It looks kind of film-like because of the grain but we also understand that it’s a high contrast black and white. In fact, the look was inspired by my favorite black and white film: Ilford Delta 400.. I’ve shot with it for a while, so I know how to get it to look the way that I want. If I wanted the look of HP5, then there would be much less contrast. Kodak Tri-X would be less contrast with deeper blacks.

So how did I go about creating this?

Editing the Images

Screen Shot 2016-01-08 at 12.40.49 PM

The image was shot with the Canon 6D, Rokinon 135mm f2 and lit with a single Phottix Mitros + fired off camera with a Phottix Odin. Now that that’s out of the way…

When I looked at the image I figured out that trying to get any sort of detail under the hat would be tough to do because of the fact that the shadow adjustments would probably interfere with other parts of the image that I didn’t want it to. Additionally, trying to just selectively brighten that area would fight too hard against the rest of the edits that I wanted to do. So instead, I chose to embrace the mysterious look of the photo.

Screen Shot 2016-01-08 at 12.41.02 PM

To start it all off, I went ahead and used the camera profile from Canon and added in the Portrait rendering. This made things a bit more saturated and darker overall. At this point I willingly chose to convert it to a black and white.

Screen Shot 2016-01-08 at 12.41.35 PM

After the conversion I identified the problematic areas:

  • Her skin is too dark
  • The shadows need to be deeper
  • The area to the top left is too dark
  • The whites can be brighter

This is where you start the process of not just creating the lazy black and white. Instead, you’re putting work into it to make it look how you’d ideally like it to be. For that to happen, you need to have a look in mind–and one of the best ways to develop that is to work with film and learn how it renders light and shadow.

Screen Shot 2016-01-08 at 12.41.50 PM

The basic adjustments were done first in this case vs working with color channels. When working with black and whites, you do the basics first and use the color channels to fine tune the work. Now we’ve got deeper shadows, we can see more of her skin, etc.

Screen Shot 2016-01-08 at 12.42.52 PM

At this point, I chose to try to clear up the area on the top left. This was done with the adjustment brush by painting over the area and raising the exposure to even it out with the rest of the scene. It worked out pretty well.

Screen Shot 2016-01-08 at 12.43.38 PM

Now came the fine tuning. Consider the following: when editing the color levels in a black and white photo, those colors will still be associated with their according areas.

To that end, choosing to tweak the orange and the rest adjusted Bec’s skin more. Again, this goes to making the image be exactly what I want it to be and therefore avoid the typical black and white look.

Now keep this in mind: not all black and white images are pure black and whites. This post explains that further.

After all this, it was only a matter of cropping the image to being the way that I liked it. I chose to add the grain in later to embrace the look even further. This wasn’t necessarily a lot of work, but then again I know what I’m doing and work with film often. However, this is how you can go ahead and start working with black and white images to create an image you’re truly proud of.

Another way to do this is to use Tonality–which also lets you make the tweaks that you want and probably does it in a way that you may find simpler.

  • Patric_1m
    Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown
    Disqus/1.1(2.84):2499688617

    Great read and loads of things for me to try on my road to picture improvement!

  • Ian Walsh
    Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown
    Disqus/1.1(2.84):2492909538

    Henri Cartier Bresson and Adams both had dodge and burn techniques and assistants who created their vision but hey lets jump down the throats of those who create their own reality with technology. I suppose when I shoot film I try to get as much right in camera as I can but I do that with digital as well. If I shoot a flat uninspired picture with film I don’t lend it more credence than one that’s digitally manipulated into something wonderful just because it analogue. To make a media comparison I have DJ’ed with both vinyl and CDJ as well control vinyl with a laptop and I can tell you that even though there may be more mystique to mixing records with vinyl if people are enjoying my music and dancing they rarely care what format it was broadcast in. I feel the same about the visual arts. If its evocative in the minds of the viewer who the hell cares how its was done.

  • Victor Reynolds
    Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown
    Disqus/1.1(2.84):2485931535

    Okay, I’m like the rest of you folks: thought it was about letting the camera do the work. That’s why I shoot more with film: to do in camera work instead of letting the computer do it all.

  • Turbofrog
    Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown
    Disqus/1.1(2.84):2485320338

    All these complaints about post-production are missing the point.

    You can’t get the image “in-camera” unless you are setting up tone-curve adjusted, high-contrast JPEG settings and then just sticking with the burned OOC JPEG. But then you’re just “editing” your work using the highly limited tools that happen to be available in camera.

    He already started with a low-key exposure to get a good starting foundation for the post work. He did what he needed to “in-camera” to get the shot.

    To drive the point a bit further, any famous print you’ve ever seen from from a famous photographer that you idealize has been manipulated in the dark room, often with local adjustments made based on a carefully crafted chart of dodge and burn instructions produced from a negative proof print based on the photographer’s aesthetic intent.

    Lightroom is called Lightroom as a callback to the work that people have always done in Darkrooms to make pictures, not just take pictures. If taking pictures is what you’re happy with, just shoot OOC JPEG and let the camera make the final choices for you.

    https://qph.is.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-6e6168732d60012889995ce4ba6a9cb1?convert_to_webp=true

  • jimbox
    Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown
    Disqus/1.1(2.84):2485119169

    I don’t get it. Is there some kind of committee that decides about the aesthetics?

  • Pepperberry Farm
    Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown
    Disqus/1.1(2.84):2485081792

    I thought (from the title) that this would be more about setting up the shot & camera, rather than just post-processing on the back end…. would that be more or less lazy than this?

  • Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown
    Disqus/1.1(2.84):2484986889

    Why is site so obsessed with editing? Why aren’t these “photographers” letting the camera do the work? Jesus christ.

    • James Billings
      Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown
      Disqus/1.1(2.84):2485152316

      How would you take a shot to emulate the look of a certain film in camera with no editing? (Asides from “use film” of course!)

    • William Yu
      Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown
      Disqus/1.1(2.84):2485890945

      I agree. I also heard Ansel Adams are furious editors on his images and have notebooks after notebooks on how to process each of his image to achieve the result he wants.

      Why is Ansel so obsessed with editing! Why didn’t Mr. Adams let the camera do the work? Holy Mother of Jesus Christ!

  • Jose Chavarria
    Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown
    Disqus/1.1(2.84):2484663657

    I’d rather choose to create the picture on the camera, when shooting.