Quick Review: Sony NEX 5N (And Comparison to the C3 and Olympus EP3)

by Chris Gampat on 08/24/2011

With today’s announcement of the Sony NEX-5N (amongst other goodies), I’m now finally able to talk about the brief hands-on experience I had with it after spending a single day and night with it. So does it stack up to the well reviewed Sony NEX C3? And more importantly, does it best the Olympus EP3 when the Sony NEX C3 couldn’t?

Disclaimer: First off, know that I spent time with a pre-production model; and I found this out after I began using it. I was told that I cannot show images from the camera and that I can’t even shoot a video of it to put on my YouTube channel because certain things about it may change.

Every now and then, us Editors will face issues like this and we just have to adhere to their guidelines. With this in mind, I will do the best I can to give you the best experience I can while you read this.

Ergonomics

The Sony NEX 5N (or NEX5n or NEX-5N depending on who you ask) has been announced along with the Sony A77, A65, NEX-7 and other lenses such as the 24mm f1.8. It is the successor to the NEX 5 that we reviewed. New to the outside of the camera is a touchscreen, easier programmable buttons so that you don’t need to navigate the dreaded menus like Leif Erikson searching for America, and that really seems to be all.

What’s majorly different is what’s on the inside—at the heart of this camera is a 16.1MP sensor that is brand new from anything that Sony has previously developed.

The bottom of the camera still harkens to the design of the NEX-5 with the SD and Battery being in the grip of the camera. This is unlike the NEX C3, where the battery and SD card slot are in different areas.

The back of the camera still puts an emphasis on simplicity for the shooter that will mostly shoot in auto settings. For the most part, a more experienced user can just leave the camera in aperture mode and just shoot all day long. Combine that with the new viewfinder that can be attached to the top of the camera, and you’ll get a styling more similar to that of using smaller rangefinder cameras (without the rangefinder of course!)

As stated earlier, the LCD screen is a touchscreen. The display is still second to none and Sony really needs to be commended on creating such a brilliant, clear and attractive LCD screen. My only complaint is that I wish that there was an anti-fingerprint coating like that of the Olympus EP3.

Indeed, when you and your friends get personal fondling time with this little cam, fingerprints will be abound.

Sony has managed to still keep the size of the camera down despite the larger sensor. Depending on your personal tastes, your opinion may vary. In have relatively large hands, and the camera doesn’t feel uncomfortable when using it. As was previous with the NEX C3, you’re best off flipping the screen up and shooting from the hip.

Autofocus

As it was with the NEX C3, the focusing is super fast, but still can’t keep up with the Olympus EP3. The same focusing modes as the C3 are present.

With the introduction of the touchscreen on this camera, one can tap an area on the LCD screen to focus. Unfortunately, tapping the screen doesn’t release the shutter (at least that I could see.) However, this camera can track moving subjects pretty damned fast. With that, you can even feel the motors constantly working to ensure that it stays locked on. While this is good, it can be a drain on the battery life. However, it’s not as bad as I thought it would be. I received the unit at 67% and shot quite a lot throughout the day with it only going down to 47%.

For the target market that this camera is aimed at: you’ll be able to track your kid, dog, or cat running around gleefully all you want.

Here’s a quirk: with my unit, when I disabled tracking focusing, it still seemed to try to focus on objects when I didn’t half press the shutter. If it is meant to do this, I highly recommend that Sony enable the user to turn off all tracking of any sort in a future firmware update.

Image Quality and High ISO Results

During my short time with the camera, I shot in RAW and JPEG. Then I imported the images onto my computer and brought them into Lightroom to take a look at them.

Jesus Christ…

That’s exactly what I said when I looked at the images. The quality with the 18-55mm kit lens is wonderful but when viewing the images at 100% one can tell that this sensor NEEDS to be paired with top notch glass. The dynamic range and color depth seems to be very good, as well as color gradation. By looking at the images, one can see anything from the most subtle blues to the deeper ones. This comes from looking at a photo my co-worker took of me while I was wearing a blue shirt. The colors aren’t as vivid as Olympus’s, but they’re still quite nice.

When I stepped down into the New York City Subway, that’s when I really started to see how well the camera performed. With the ISO levels raised up, I started to see that the noise control while retaining detail was still quite admirable.

Additionally, skin tones are amazingly good for a sensor this sized. When I shot a photo of a pretty girl, I went home and looked at the photos wanting to reach into the screen. No really, they’re that good. They’re not like the Fuji X100 while shooting in Astia mode, but they’re still very, very good. In fact, I feel neither camera could touch the Sony A900 in skin tones at lower ISOs.

Overall, Sony should be commended for what they’ve done with this camera’s image quality.

Now seriously Sony, get on with creating some better glass will you please?!

Metering

Getting a great image only comes if you know how to meter well. In the subway, I started to notice that the camera tended to underexpose my images a bit. That’s not a terribly big deal though, I can always boost them up in Lightroom.

However, in bright daylight, the Sunny 16 rules worked nearly perfect. In contrast, with good lighting on the subway cars, the camera needed to crank the ISO up to 1600 at f3.5 while other cameras I’ve handled haven’t needed to. Based on this performance, I’m not quite sure what to say about the metering. As always, your eyes and knowledge are the best meters.

Vs the C3

So how does the Sony NEX-5N stack up against the C3?

To be quite honest, I don’t see why I wouldn’t buy a C3 instead.

The touchscreen of the 5N is very nice and so is the fact that I can use an electronic viewfinder, but shooting from the hip has become such a joy that I can only justify using the C3. I’d almost never use the touchscreen on this camera because it doesn’t release the shutter the way that the EP3′s does. If it did, this would be a no-brainer option.

See the photo above? It is from the NEX C3 review. The dude is out of focus. What that needed is a tap of the touchscreen and then the immediate shutter release. Not tap to focus and then manually release! Sony missed the ball on this one. Correction, the shutter speed is also too low. So motion blur was also affecting this.

Additionally, the C3 is more pocketable. Sure, the grip isn’t as pronounced, but I can live without it when shooting from the hip.

Vs the EP3

There is a very good reason why reviewers are raving over the Olympus EP3. Besides the stunning good looks worth cheating on your spouse for (don’t tell them I said that!), the focusing system, ergonomics, build quality, and entire design of the camera wins. The image quality isn’t as good as the Sony’s, but with modern editing software, you can turn the EP3′s output into something worthy of being called art.

In fact, the art filters on this camera are so good that I sometimes wouldn’t even bother editing in Lightroom.

Conclusions

Without having my hands on the Sony NEX-7, I can’t help but recommend other options over the NEX 5N at the moment. The C3 is not only cheaper, but provides enough of the features I’ll need and use. The NEX 7 looks really sweet with all the dials, but I still have yet to hold one.

With this said, I can’t really understand why someone would get the 5N over the other two cameras in the Sony lineup. However, I cannot deny just how good a camera it is. Once again though, if the C3 and 5N are this good, I can only dream of what the NEX7 can be like.

You can get the Sony NEX-5n at B&H or from Amazon in body only, black with kit lens or Silver with kit lens.

Please Support The Phoblographer

We love to bring you guys the latest and greatest news and gear related stuff. However, we can’t keep doing that unless we have your continued support. If you would like to purchase any of the items mentioned, please do so by clicking our links first and then purchasing the items as we then get a small portion of the sale to help run the website.

  • Pingback: sonyalpharumors | Blog | Continually updated: Sony announces the A77 NEX-7 and lots of other cameras and lenses!

  • Pingback: Mirrorless Rumors | Blog | Sonyhuge announcement, and Nikons huge disappointment!

  • Pingback: Sony announcement | Photo Rumors

  • Pingback: Sonyhuge announcement, and Nikons huge disappointment! « b r e a k m e l o d y

  • Anonymous

    If you think about the video capabilities you will understand why the NEX-5N can be a better option. For the videographers, AVCHD 2.0 1080p60 with full manual control is a deal breaker. If you add a decent glass from Nikon, Canon, etc. with an adapter, using peaking mode to focus, I think that the video that you can get will be very interesting. And if you think that the NEX-7 will be twice the price, I think that NEX-5N is very interesting.

    Did you see the new Panasonic’s X lenses? That looks very interesting as it’s very compact and can be appealing for video enthusiasts – powerzoom and inner focusing. Can you imagine a GH3 with that kind of lenses? Which makes me think, NEX-7 or GH3? Or GF7 (GF PRO)?

  • Anonymous

    If you think about the video capabilities you will understand why the NEX-5N can be a better option. For the videographers, AVCHD 2.0 1080p60 with full manual control is a deal breaker. If you add a decent glass from Nikon, Canon, etc. with an adapter, using peaking mode to focus, I think that the video that you can get will be very interesting. And if you think that the NEX-7 will be twice the price, I think that NEX-5N is very interesting.

    Did you see the new Panasonic’s X lenses? That looks very interesting as it’s very compact and can be appealing for video enthusiasts – powerzoom and inner focusing. Can you imagine a GH3 with that kind of lenses? Which makes me think, NEX-7 or GH3? Or GF7 (GF PRO)?

    • Chris Gampat

      Videographers aren’t going to buy the 5n. They’re going to go for the actual Sony camcorders.

      The Panasonic lenses haven’t even been announced yet.

    • http://www.facebook.com/chrisgampat Chris Gampat

      Why won’t they go with the higher FS100 then? Also, the Panasonic lenses aren’t even official yet.

      • Anonymous

        Does that even make sense? You asked why would someone buy a NEX-5N instead of the NEX-C3 or the NEX-7, because it shares some of the video feats of the NEX-7 but it cost half the price. I didn’t get that kind of answer you gave me.

        Why would I buy a NEX-FS100? That doesn’t make sense at all.

        It looks like the X lens will be official by the end of this week.

        • Anonymous

          Totally makes sense: videographers use lots of manual glass via adapters (which works well with peaking), need more inputs such as XLR and headphone jacks, need to mount external monitors on there, need to adapt a rail system for better ergonomics, need to color grade easily, need to save certain customized color settings, need to shoot uncompressed video. It is extremely tough to do any of that with the NEX 5n.

          If you’re a videographer, why wouldn’t you buy the FS100? It has everything you need. And if you want cheaper, why wouldn’t you get the VG-20?

          -Chris Gampat
          Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
          Twitter.com/ChrisGampat
          Chrisgampat.tumblr.com

          • Anonymous

            But if I was going for a NEX-5N it means I can’t or I don’t need a NEX-FS100, right? It’s two completely different things and that doesn’t even have much to do with why I talked about the video anyway. The only real point was that the NEX-5N has way better feats than the NEX-C3 and it’s much cheaper than the NEX-7, that’s why the NEX-5N can be appealing. That’s just it, nothing else.

            • Anonymous

              You’re talking about being a videographer, implying that you’re a pro…
              Chris Gampat,
              Editor in Chief
              The Phoblographer

              • Anonymous

                Where did you get that from? I’ve never said about using the NEX-5n for PRO purposes and I was not implying anything besides saying that contrary to what you thought and wrote, there are reasons why you would buy this instead of NEX-C3 and NEX-7 – just these two, the NEX-FS100 has nothing to do with it.

                It’s like I’m saying why you would want to buy a Macbook Air instead of a Macbook Pro or a Macbook and then you say something like “nah, buy a 12-core 64GB 4x512GB SSD Mac Pro, it’s better”.

                It’s totally out of the matter, but if you can’t understand that, there are not much other ways to explain that to you or maybe you are just being stubborn. In some way I think that you misread what I wrote from the beginning because as I said, your answer was nonsense. If it was a joke it could’ve been funny… hahaha…

                • Chris Gampat

                  I’m going to full assume that you don’t understand the needs of videographers and judging by your email address you’re probably a spammer. So anything not insightful or explaining yourself will be treated as spam.

            • Chris Gampat

              If you’re going for the 5n, you care mostly about stills. If you’re going for the FS100, you care mostly about video. Despite this, neither shoot RAW codecs for video. Also now that I think about it, do you need 1080p? When I shoot, my stuff mostly goes on the web and resized down to 720p for faster streaming.

          • Scuba Filmer

            There are many reasons to use a smaller cam like this for video *if* the quality is right. It’s the smallest/cheapest way to get a large sensor / good low light / short DoF video camera with manual controls. Not having to take a big still cam plus a big video cam + lenses when travelling. Avoiding the cost of buying both a full quality still and video camera (so able to spend on the lenses instead), and my personal criteria – ability to take it in a dive enclosure to film and photograph subsea. I can’t afford a FS100, and there’s no dive enclosure for a VG20. With the new manual video controls, I’m hoping the 5N hits all the right notes.

            One question for the author. On the old NEX5, video tended to show frame tear when panning sideways, especially in lower light – you’d see a step change in the frame slowly scan down the frame. Has the new sensor solved this?

  • Pingback: Anonymous

  • Anonymous

    Why is it that writers – and I use the term loosely – consider it ‘neat’ to use religious terms that are disparaging to many or foul words to highlight their excitement or to make a point.  Oh yeah – they don’t have any grasp of language or descriptive writing. There was no need for your use of the Christian God in your review.  Or next time try Allah or Mohammed - see how that goes over…..

    • Anonymous

      Your first sentence needs a question mark at the end, because it’s a question. No need to double space your sentences as that standard has been obsolete and there is only need for three periods after your last sentence.
      Oh, and as a guy that attended Catholic school his entire life and knows the typical Sunday Mass backwards and front, I can say this with confidence: chill. There are worse things in the world to worry about.

      Oh, and “neat” should have full quotation marks and have a comma before said marks according to AP standards.

      Chris Gampat,
      Editor in Chief
      The Phoblographer

    • photogcrazy

      Really? Who CARES! Just read the article. No need to critique.

    • photogcrazy

      Really? Who CARES! Just read the article. No need to critique.

    • Pantat

      Dudes like you are the ones that mostly end up being  terrorists who  blow themselves in order to have peace on their corrupted and confused   mind 

  • Richard

    I think the better video, deeper grip, slightly better construction and touch screen make the 5N worth the extra money over the C3. Another thing for existing NEX owners is the 5N will be available as body only.

  • Richard

    I think the better video, deeper grip, slightly better construction and touch screen make the 5N worth the extra money over the C3. Another thing for existing NEX owners is the 5N will be available as body only.

  • Richard

    I think the better video, deeper grip, slightly better construction and touch screen make the 5N worth the extra money over the C3. Another thing for existing NEX owners is the 5N will be available as body only.

  • AW

    Any 25p or 30p options for video? Doesn’t seem like it – very strange!

    • Anonymous

      I wondered the same thing during my meeting with them. I’m not sure.

      -Chris Gampat
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/ChrisGampat
      Chrisgampat.tumblr.com

      • AW

        The Sony UK rep on this evening’s livechat said that all new Sony cams announced today were 25p/50i/p in PAL countries and 24p/60i/p in NTSC countries. In other words no 30p on any models, no 24p in Europe, no 25p in USA… Big mistake on Sony’s part I think!

  • chad

    Thanks for the review. One comment that you might want to correct relates to your example of the “dude” walking on stilts. He is not blurry because you were focusing on the wrong spot, he is out of focus due to motion blur – read incorrect exposure settings for the shot. Touch focusing would have resulted in exactly the same image…

    • http://www.facebook.com/chrisgampat Chris Gampat

      I see where you’re coming from. But notice the background being in focus as well though. You’re right though.

      • chad

        Yeah, I don’t really see much in focus here but you were at 1/60 and f2.8. Looks like the whole image suffers from a little motion blur with your subject getting the worst of it due to his proximity and speed. Also tough to tell from a web shot.

        Touch focusing is appealing to some people but I would not hold it as a standard as many photographers would rather keep both hands steady on the camera.  

        • Anonymous

          You still can. Use your thumbs instead to touch the screen :)

          -Chris Gampat
          Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
          Twitter.com/ChrisGampat
          Chrisgampat.tumblr.com

  • Pingback: Sony announcement (updated) | | What Is PhotographyWhat Is Photography

  • Anonymous

    I want a NEX camera, but the Sony lens lineup right now is crap. Sony needs to make some more fast primes. Specifically, I’d like to see a 70 mm F2.5, and a 16 mm F2.0. These would be roughly equivalent to the new m.zuiko primes.

  • Anonymous

    I want a NEX camera, but the Sony lens lineup right now is crap. Sony needs to make some more fast primes. Specifically, I’d like to see a 70 mm F2.5, and a 16 mm F2.0. These would be roughly equivalent to the new m.zuiko primes.

  • Pingback: Sony esitleb NEX-5N hübriidkaamerat: kiirem ja puutetundlikum | Photopointi ajaveeb

  • Stephan Molegraaf

    After reading all your reviews and comparisons, I can’t help but ask for your advise. I’m interested in buying a Sony NEX, Olympus EP3 or Fuji x100. The EP3 wasn’t my first pick, but you convinced me of its worth. But… I can buy a NEX-5 (not 5N) in Holland for just 320 euro’s (with electronics euro’s have the same value as dollars, so let’s say 320 dollars) with the kitlens. The EP3 will set me back 900 with kitlens. The NEX-5 leaves room for the upcoming Carl Zeiss 24mm F1.8. 

    Seeing the price difference and guessing the quality of the Zeiss lens, with would you recommend? 
    The NEX-5 with the Zeiss lens or the EP3 with the Zuiko 45mm? They would set me back the same amount. Of course the Fuji is still in mind because of it’s beautiful appearance, but I don’t think it’s a camera I can hand to my wife so she can take a quick pic…

    • Anonymous

      Hi Stephan,

      You can surely hand the X100 to your wife to take a quick pic if you set the Shutter speed and Aperture to auto.

      The NEX 5 is good and that Zeiss lens will be dreamy. But it’s going to be huge.

      The EP3 is also quite good, and the 45mm f1.8 I’ve read and seen so far is amazing.

      To be honest with you, I’d either go with the X100 or the EP3. The X100 will save you more money because of the fixed lens. Micro Four Thirds makes you want more lenses. Trust me.

      If you do make a purchase, please use my links and banners. It helps to support the site.

      -Chris Gampat
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/ChrisGampat
      Chrisgampat.tumblr.com

    • Scott M

      As an owner of an E-P3 (which I like a lot) I would say go with the NEX-5 unless you intend to buy a lot of lenses. If you’re going to buy lots of lenses then your choice of system/format is more important than saving money on a body.

  • Pdf Ninja

    There are many reasons I’d like this over the C3. First, no serious shooter with his right mind would put a Sony kit lens on this puppy. The C3 can’t be bought as body only, which means the 5N has the same price as the C3 with the mediocre 16mm. The 5N has a magnesium alloy construction, touch screen, electronic first-curtain shutter, and a much better grip. I think the 5N is clearly the winner at the same price as the C3 for anyone who doesn’t want the Sony kit lenses.

    With an adapter your legacy manual focus lenses get a second life, thanks to the peaking mode manual focus assist feature, which all NEX cameras have.  A Nikon NEX adapter can be bought for $32, and you can set the aperture directly on the lens, like in the good old days.

  • Pingback: Nikon unveils S1200pj and AW100 cameras, we go hands-on

  • http://twitter.com/alzubairz alzubair

    hi there,.. thanks for your comparison review on Sony nex 5n camera

  • Zeegee

    Beware that  the C3 is very slippery and has a substandard grip when compared to the 5n, also the electronic first shutter curtain on the 5n results in a much quieter shutter as compared to the C3 I kept the 5n and returned the C3

    • ChrisGampat

      I didn’t find it terribly slippery. It’s best used with a wrist strap.
      *-Chris Gampat*
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

  • http://www.facebook.com/brittany.maree Brittany Maree

    Hi,
    I am wanting to buy a camera to travel with. I am tossing up between buying the Sony NEX5N and the NEXC3. I am not really interested in the videos, basically just the photos.
    Which camera would you advise I get?
    Thanks!

    • ChrisGampat

      Hi,

      What subject matter do you want to shoot and how far do you want to go into your photography?

      *-Chris Gampat*
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

Previous post:

Next post: