The Phoblographer

Photography: Think Simpler

Which One? Sony NEX C3 vs Olympus EP3

with 36 comments

The Sony NEX C3 (or NEX-C3 and NEXC3) is a hot new camera; but so is the Olympus EP3 (or E-P3, E P3, EP 3, and EP-3). In the world of mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras, these two are currently amongst the choices of many users. Whether you want a DSLR alternative, a smaller camera with more power, or a camera for street photography, you may be confused as to which one to purchase. This post will hopefully clear things up.

Before you go on reading you may want to check out our EP3 review and our NEX C3 review.

Ergonomics

Sony NEX C3: Small, awesome LCD screen that flips up. It seems like this camera was designed to be shot from the hip. It’s not bad overall, and changing the settings isn’t difficult providing you have a bit of time.

Olympus EP3: Small, feels great in the hand, designed for you to walk right up to a subject, touch the screen, and move on. Very, very nice styling as well. Plus there are interchangeable grips.

Winner: EP3 for the interchangeable grips and customization. The NEX system still needs to mature a bit at the time of this writing.

Ruggedness

Sony C3: The body feels as if it’s made of plastic.

Olympus EP3: The body doesn’t feel as rugged as it’s predecessor, the Olympus EP2. However, it is made of aluminum, and that’s more than tough enough for most people. Do note though that this also makes it heavier in the hand.

Winner: Aluminum wins, this goes to the Olympus EP3.

Autofocus

Sony NEX C3: Super fast focusing. Tracking could be better though. Also, the focusing still isn’t as smart as a DSLR based on your composition of the scene.

Olympus EP3: Perhaps the fastest focusing we’ve seen to date. It even outpaces a DSLR by a small margin. Plus the touch to focus feature makes shooting even easier. Before this camera, I hated touch screens.

Winner: Olympus EP3. It took you years to fix the autofocus, but now it’s very good.

Manual Focus

Sony NEX C3: This camera has peaking built in. That means that you’ll see lines go across the screen showing you exactly what in the scene is in focus. For legacy lens users, you’ll be smitten with this and perhaps want to convert over from any other system you have just for this feature.

Olympus EP3: The Micro Four Thirds system allows you to magnify a certain area of the screen for critical manual focusing. The EP3 allows you to do it with the touch of a button.

Winner: Sony NEX C3. Peaking is just so much more natural and you’re still able to see the rest of the scene without needing to magnify an area 10x.

Battery Life

Sony NEX C3: I needed to charge it perhaps every other day when I used it often. Dimming the screen helped tremendously though.

Olympus EP3: Same as the C3, but due to the amount of energy that the touch screen pulls, it was sapped quicker.

Winner: Sony NEX C3 by a hair. Olympus could still save themselves by developing another battery that could work with the EP2 and EP3.

Lens Choices

Sony NEX C3: Native lens choices aren’t that many. However, Sony seems to be putting more and more priority on primes. Many would argue that these smaller systems are designed for prime lenses. More adapters are also being made for the Sony system for users to adapt any lens they want.

Olympus EP3: The Micro Four Thirds system already has numerous adapters for various lenses. Additionally, both Olympus and Panasonic create their own lenses. Because you have two companies producing products, more of it tends to come out.

Winner: Olympus EP3. This is because Panasonic and Olympus both jointly design lenses and the system is older. Sony, I’m sure, will catch up.

Image Quality

Sony NEX C3: The sensor in the Sony NEX C3 produces some very vivid colors. The bigger sensor also allows for a larger dynamic range, color depth and better control over high ISOs.

Olympus EP3: Olympus’s colors are still very, very good. However, the images from the Sony NEX C3 still look more professional. To be fair, both cameras need top of the line glass to really take advantage of their sensors. When it comes to glass, Olympus wins hands down.

Winner: Tie. Sony’s sensor has great potential but requires better lenses. Olympus’s sensor isn’t as strong as the APS-C beast inside the C3, but their lenses are perhaps the best in the EVIL line up of cameras.

High ISOs

Sony NEX C3: The new sensor soaks up light much more than I’ve seen before. What do I mean by that? Well, at ISO 6400, it seems more sensitive than my Canon 7D at an equivalent exposure level. Additionally, the noise control isn’t that bad. Everything is usable.

Olympus EP3: I’ve had more than one person write in and tell me that the EP3 is very usable at the higher ISO settings. I’ve thought so myself. In fact, the EP3 did things that I didn’t even think were possible at the near nuclear levels.

Winner: Sony NEX C3 for the reasons that the camera has better noise control but while still maintaining more detail in the images.

Ease of Use

Sony NEX C3: The Sony NEX system was seemingly designed so far for the user the set the camera in Auto mode and leave it. So if you wanted to change any of the settings, you needed to go through lots of menus. That’s still there, but it’s more manageable now with the C3. Also, good going with explaining every single feature of the camera through the menu system.

Seriously, thank you Sony for listening to us. Now get rid of the company philosophy or the Executive that forces consumers to buy only Sony products to work with their system. For example, your hot shoe. Did you really need to create your own?

Olympus EP3: Everything about the camera is very simple for the most part. The new menu is very swank, and the entire camera can pretty much be controlled via the screen (with some exceptions.).

When it comes to shooting though, there is nothing better than setting the camera to Aperture mode, touching an area of the screen and hearing the satisfying shutter noise.

Winner: Olympus EP3. However, Sony made a great effort this time around. But it’s just not for me.

Portability

Sony NEX C3: Man, that thing is tiny. Combine that with the light weight and you’ve got yourself a travel camera that your hands will never tire of.

Olympus EP3: It’s a light camera, but it begs to be slung around your chest with a nice leather strap. Think of it almost like a Leica.

Winner: NEX C3.

Conclusions

This was a very tough battle. The Olympus EP3 is what I consider to be revolutionary to street photography. Indeed, I deemed it better than the Leica M9-P and Fuji X100. However, when I used the Sony NEX C3 I was very impressed with the image quality. My only problem was that I wish that the lens line up were better. Sony bought Minolta and they have a very close relationship with Zeiss. Doesn’t it only make sense that they should have better lenses?

With this said, Olympus’s strength is in their lenses. I’ve always thought this: I only believe Canon, Nikkor primes, and Leica are better lens makers. However, they still need sensor improvement, although they’ve come a long way in high ISOs with full frames and against APS-C sensors.

As far as focusing goes, the Olympus cannot be beat. Seriously, Nikon had better watch out.

However, the Sony has a strength of it’s own. By using the flip up LCD screen, one can shoot from the hip with ease and not alarm any one. With the Olympus, you’ll shoot so quickly that you can move right on after you’re done. And the shot rarely misses its mark.

In the end though, I need to give this to the Olympus EP3 and admit that this has been the most difficult comparison review I’ve done to date. With that said though, this battle of NEX C3 vs EP3 is also a bit crazy. They’re targeted at slightly different markets, but have enough similarities to overlap into the competitor’s intended reach. In the end, it will all come out to your shooting style.

I’d personally also choose the Olympus for the reason that I’m smitten with their lenses and already have a decent investment in the system. However, the moment that Sony releases a digital Minolta CL-E, I will kiss the Micro Four Thirds system goodbye…maybe. I’ve got a hunch that Olympus knows this game isn’t over.

Sony NEX C3: B&H or Amazon

Olympus EP3: B&H or Amazon

Please Support The Phoblographer

We love to bring you guys the latest and greatest news and gear related stuff. However, we can’t keep doing that unless we have your continued support. If you would like to purchase any of the items mentioned, please do so by clicking our links first and then purchasing the items as we then get a small portion of the sale to help run the website.

Related posts:

  1. The Complete Olympus EPL-2 Review
  2. Field Review: Olympus E-5 (Day 1)
  3. The Complete Olympus XZ-1 Review
  4. The Olympus EP3 and 12mm F/2 Shoot Some Video
  5. Which One: Olympus EP-3 vs Olympus EP-2

Written by Chris Gampat

August 19th, 2011 at 12:12 am

  • Matthew Sugiarto

    Interesting, I wait for GF3 vs E-P3 battle review! :) . Since sony C-3 lacks buttons and the menu inside it is too complicated. Yes, the minimalist design is so good but it’s not easy to change the camera setting.

  • http://www.facebook.com/byazrov Vladimir Byazrov

    I will never buy any Sony product again. Their ARW has no support. windows 7 driver seem not to work in windows 7 64-bit ultimate, and in my photoshop cs5 with acr 6.4.1 ( latest) arw files don’t open. I google internet for hours, no solution. You don’t call company a Canon for nothing. I once stepped out from Canon to buy nex-c3 and will never do it again. Sony is dead to me.

    • Stevendoring

      Photographer problem

  • Vik

    Key decission making point missing – availability of viewfinder. 

    Or You don’t use viewfinder at all?

    Do I understrand well that You shoot by touching display instead of pressing shutter button?
    Explain more, please,  this way of shooting why You do it etc.

    • Anonymous

      Because its actually much quicker and easier to use than the viewfinder. Especially with autofocus lenses. Wrap the strap around your wrist, touch the spot, and you’re all set.

      Chris Gampat,
      Editor in Chief
      The Phoblographer

  • NYFANS

    What about pricing?  Is NEX-C3 or EP3 a better bang for the buck?

    • Anonymous

      Links are now at the end of the story. Compare the prices for yourself if you’d like.

  • Dolan Halbrook

    “With this said, Olympus’s strength is in their lenses. I’ve always thought this: I only believe Canon, Nikkor primes, and Leica are better lens makers…”

    Um… Pentax limited primes anyone?

    • Anonymous

      Pentax limited primes are nice but can’t touch the ones I stated.

      Chris Gampat,
      Editor in Chief
      The Phoblographer

      • Dolan Halbrook

        Can’t touch?  Wow, that’s hyperbole if I’ve ever heard it.  The FA 31 Limited is considered to be one of the best AF lenses ever produced, by anyone, ever.  Not all the Limiteds are fantastic, but overall they’re definitely a match for equivalent Canon and Nikkor primes.  And if you’re gonna make a list like that you have to include Zeiss (think T*) as any ex-Contax shooter will tell you.

        • Anonymous

          Oh, that reminds me: Pentax’s 645 lenses are nice. I’m not really a fan of some of the Limited primes for DSLRs but I do acknowledge that they are very good. There’s just something to the character about them that doesn’t attract me. When we tested it with the K5, we went through two copies and both purple fringed like crazy. Sure you can get rid of that in post, but the bokeh still wasn’t as creamy as the likes of Canon and Nikon. Plus the overall feel, performance and durability of a nice Canon 35mm f1.4 L is unlike any other.

          I apologize if I offend you as I know that Pentax users are a sensitive bunch, but that company needs to revamp their lenses. I agree with lots of Pentaxians that wondered why they released the Q instead of working on their lens line. However, the Q has its niche market that it will do well with.
          Also, if you believe Pentax lenses are nice, you should take a look at Olympus Zukio glass.

          Hopefully with Ricoh’s buyout, more resources will be put into R+D and marketing.

          As for Zeiss, I own a Zeiss lens and consider them better for videography than I do for photography.

          -Chris Gampat
          Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
          Twitter.com/ChrisGampat

  • Dolan Halbrook

    I’m surprised the NEX won the portability battle given the general bulkiness of the NEX lenses.  I suppose it depends a lot on which one you happen to have attached.  With the 16mm prime it is truly small, but with the zoom it looks woefully unbalanced and awkward.

    • Anonymous

      Agreed. I left the zoom at home most of the time. But that camera is very small. You’re right though, I wish the lenses were smaller.

      Chris Gampat,
      Editor in Chief
      The Phoblographer

  • loubinas

    How can the Sony win the portability category when it lacks decent fast pancake primes and potentially new future lenses are still huge? “..your hands will never tire” of using this minuscule body and the huge upcoming Zeiss 24mm and assorted zooms? 

    • Anonymous

      The body itself is smaller and even with the pancake it is still quite small.

      I know what is coming from Sony so I’m not going to comment any further. But keep your eyes peeled.

      Chris Gampat,
      Editor in Chief
      The Phoblographer

  • Spoorthy Vemula

    Why is the k-5 never mentioned for street photography. Its pretty small, the shutter is quiet and paired with pentax amazing limited lenses it create a preety small package that has better images than anything comparable at the size

    • Anonymous

      Its still too large. Hell, a Rebel can be too large.

      Chris Gampat,
      Editor in Chief
      The Phoblographer

  • Pingback: 'E-P3 vs NEX-C3' - Micro Four Thirds User Forum

  • Pingback: 'NEX-C3 vs Olympus E-P3'

  • Pingback: Mirrorless shootout at ePhotozine (and a couple of new E-P3 reviews) « b r e a k m e l o d y

  • Pingback: Reviews: Olympus PEN E-P3 » Photo Video Online [en]

  • Pingback: Reviews: Sony NEX-C3 » Photo Video Online [en]

  • Anonymous

    Thanks for the comparison!

    What kind of strap is that on the EP-3?

    • Anonymous

      Its from this. If you decide to make a purchase, please use our links and banners to support the site.

      Chris Gampat,
      Editor in Chief
      The Phoblographer

    • Anonymous

      Its from this. If you decide to make a purchase, please use our links and banners to support the site.

      Chris Gampat,
      Editor in Chief
      The Phoblographer

  • Hiro8819

    NEX-5のセンサーは素晴らしいですよ・・・・スゴイですよ・・ 最高ですよね 特に夜間の撮影に素晴らしいですよ・・・・スゴイですよ・・ それと趣味の写真などもいいんです それはアダプターでレンズを交換が出来るため都合がいいんです・・これは便利ですよね・・・・スゴイですよ・・

  • Pingback: La Olympus PEN E-P3

  • Pingback: Quick Review: Sony NEX 5N (And Comparison to the C3 and Olympus EP3) at The Phoblographer

  • Pingback: Raw File Comparison: Olympus EP3 vs Sony NEX C3 at The Phoblographer

  • Pingback: Using the Digital Rolleiflex For Street Photography « Hot Camera Lens

  • Denis Obrien1

    All coments are simple and understanable in simple english
    RAY O’BRIEN

  • Renato Fonseca
    • Anonymous

      Much more features, better build quality, faster focusing.

      *-Chris Gampat*
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer
      The Phoblographer on Google +
      The Phoblographer on Tumblr