web analytics


Image via ThatJCrewGinghamShirt

Instagram has been used to do a lot of things, but prove a simple fact that all “bros” do the same thing is something that it can do very well. There are loads of accounts that parody bro behavior, but even better is this new Instagram that combines candid street fashion with showing off the fact that loads of guys all wear the same shirt and don’t try to find any way to differentiate themselves from the supposed norm.

We got word of ThatJCrewGinghamShirt, which has only been around a month but has been able to go around NYC and find loads and loads of guys that wear the same exact shirt. It’s run by Jonathan Sans, who probably encounters it all over Midtown Manhattan.

This Instagram just proves that with the right idea, you can pull together loads of content and get a full following into photography stardom.


All images by Stuart Holroyd. Used with permission

Photographer Stuart Holroyd is a 34 year old British photographer currently based in Cyprus. He’s on a mission to help some pooches–but we’re talking about a whole lot of them. Mr. Holroyd’s work started off very bizarre and gothic according to him, but one wouldn’t think that it would evolve into beautiful portraits of dogs. After a very personal and life changing experience, Stuart decided to dedicate his photography to helping others.

That’s how to Bay Tree Project was started. According to Stuart, it was “an idea I came up with to try and help Bay Tree Rescue centre in Larnaca, Cyprus. Over here there are no animal cruelty laws so unfortunately you will find hurt animals almost everywhere you go.”

To help the dogs, an elderly woman by the name of Kayte who lives in a hut at the bottom of the rescue center with no electricity has chosen to aid some of the dogs–sometimes even putting their health before her own. As a result, Kayte is fostering over 70 dogs on donations from her friends and her UK pension.

The images after the jump are part of those that will be in an exhibit in February. “We will auction off original signed work for each of these images, and the event will be a worldwide auction with online and telephone bidding allowed so we can increase exposure and hopefully raise more money.” says Stuart.

Stuart’s images profile the dogs in a beautiful fashion against an equally dreamy background. And any dog lover really can’t resist.

[click to continue…]

Canon Rebel T5 (EOS 1200D)

Today, we’ve found a brand new Canon T5 bundle deal, but here is the rebate link. After the jump, you’ll find loads more that we’ve been curating.

[click to continue…]

Richard Selby Cops

Street photographer versus cops: the unfortunate eternal struggle. Now the latest fight according to the Amateur Photographer involves the Brighton, East Sussex police stopping 81-year-old photographer Richard for taking pictures of some women dressed up for a hen party (essentially a bachelorette party). Two uniformed officers approached the Selby on West Street and threatened to arrest him if he did not identify himself

After threatening to arrest Richard, the officer called over a police sergeant. Surrounded by four police officers and fearing a weekend in a cell, Richard finally relinquished his identity. After the incident a police spokesperson explained the sergeant was in his right because Richard’s actions could have been considered as “antisocial.”

Digging into a little bit of legalese Section 50 of the Police Reform Act 2002 requires citizens to give up their name and address if the office believes they have been “acting in an antisocial method.” As for what accounts for antisocial behavior, the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 defines it as “acting in a ‘manner that caused or was likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress.”

“[Richard] was acting in an antisocial manner and in these circumstances a police officer may request a name and address to establish a person’s identity,” the police said in a statement published yesterday. “There is a power of arrest if this is refused.” In short the situation could set a precedence where photography may be considered as antisocial or harmful behavior to the public.

The police also defamed Richard’s actions alleging one of his photos may have been shot at an inappropriately low angle and clearly shows a teenager girl’s posterior. We’re not going to mince words here—the cops are accusing Richard of being an old pervert. Richard denies the claim, noting the dozen or so photos have any girls bending over or teenage girls. Moving forward Richard says he plans on taking his complaint up the chain to the local police commissioner and maybe even the Home Secretary.

Via Amateur Photographer


You’re not a professional or even a semi-pro: let’s be honest here. So instead, you can easily be called a semi-amateur photographer–or at least that’s what this T-shirt from the Chivery says you are. The very tongue-in-cheek creation is poking fun at Instagrammers in their on-site description. It states “Chive on, all you aspiring shutterbugs. Trust us – this t-shirt will get you where you’re going. Which just might be nowhere fast. But at least you’re not standing still.”

If anything, at least it will make you feel better when you’re rockin’ that Sony A7r on full auto mode.

Want a semi-amateur photographer t-shirt to call your own? The shirts will cost you around $28 and are available for both men and women.

Via the Holdfast Gear Tumblr


Image from the Wikimedia Commons

According to a report from Ars Technica, the US Copyright regulators are ruling on the side of Wikipedia that a selfie taken by a monkey cannot be copyrighted. The primate “borrowed” a camera from a photographer, who then tried to copyright the selfie image. Photographer David Slater tried to make the claim that the image was his, but in a stand for what could arguably be called animal rights, the US Copyright office decided that a photograph taken by a monkey is unprotected intellectual property.

With that said, the image remains part of the Wikimedia Commons and the delightful dopey monkey’s face can once again go viral all over the net.

So how did this all start? Well, when the image was added to the Commons, apparently Slater went after them. But according to the Telegraph, Wikimedia fought back and said that the monkey owns the selfie. We can only imagine lawyers in the room trying to say this with a straight face.

This brings up the question now: with dog and cat selfie apps out there, who is the owner of the image?