fbpx
Cameras

RAW File Test: Olympus EPL-2

Chris Gampat
No Comments
03/17/2011
3 Mins read
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

When we finished reviewing the Olympus EPL-2, the RAW file support hadn’t been released yet for Adobe Lightroom 3. With the latest release of Lightroom 3.4 RC, that support is now available. In our review, we gave the camera rave reviews for JPEG image quality. RAW files are supposed to be more versatile in the editing process, so it would only make sense that the processing would be amazing, right?

Here’s the deal: in good light or with a great exposure, the raw files are top notch in terms of achieving amazing quality. This means that the best thing to do when shooting is to get it right in camera. However, RAW files are supposed to give you latitude to correct mistakes that you may have made: at least this is what Canon and Nikon do from my previous experiences. Now, I don’t mean to rain on Olympus’ parade but I expect more leeway with the editing by now with new cameras coming out very often.

The image above had no noise reduction applied. The only things I did was raise the exposure and tweak the white balance settings. I’m beginning to think that the white balance settings in the Olympus EPL-2 are flawed for the reason that the ambient lighting was extremely warm to begin with and the Olympus should have theoretically given me an image like this to begin with to balance the color temperature. For those of you that don’t know, the lighting temperature works in an inverse relationship to your camera’s color temperature.

So that means that if the lighting was orange-yellow, that the camera should have set itself to blue-violet (incandescent as they call it) to create a more balanced image. This leads me to believe that in good lighting, the images will be very properly balanced and that in not so appealing lighting, you’ll need to work a bit harder.

In the image above (once again in good lighting) all I did was a minor color balance tweak towards the warmer end of the spectrum.

Oppositely, this image was balanced more towards the cooler end. At this point it would be a good idea to say that I left the white balance setting in auto the entire time because of the fact that I just didn’t want to bother messing with it. As a professional wanting a smaller camera, I wanted to do as little work as possible and just focus on creating the image.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying the images are terrible. In fact, when you shoot in JPEG and don’t even bother with the RAW files you will never be happier. I’d only recommend shooting RAW in very low light.

Something that is still killing me though is the dynamic range of the Olympus cameras. It really needs a boost. I tried editing and saving this image, but darn well couldn’t. The blues are overly dominant, I wanted to rescue more detail in the blown out areas but couldn’t, and overall editing of the image was just frustrating because common editing practices applied to other brands didn’t work here.

If I were to buy the Olympus EPL-2, it wouldn’t necessarily be for the image quality. It would be because of the form factor, light weight, sex appeal of the camera, the amazing viewfinder, fun art filters, and the stealthiness that I have when shooting street photography.

Please Support The Phoblographer

We love to bring you guys the latest and greatest news and gear related stuff. However, we can’t keep doing that unless we have your continued support. If you would like to purchase any of the items mentioned, please do so by clicking our links first and then purchasing the items as we then get a small portion of the sale to help run the website.

Also, please follow us on Facebook, Flickr and Twitter.

EPL-2 image quality lightroom olympus raw file versatility
Shares
Written by

Chris Gampat is the Editor in Chief, Founder, and Publisher of the Phoblographer. He provides oversight to all of the daily tasks, including editorial, administrative, and advertising work. Chris's editorial work includes not only editing and scheduling articles but also writing them himself. He's the author of various product guides, educational pieces, product reviews, and interviews with photographers. He's fascinated by how photographers create, considering the fact that he's legally blind./ HIGHLIGHTS: Chris used to work in Men's lifestyle and tech. He's a veteran technology writer, editor, and reviewer with more than 15 years experience. He's also a Photographer that has had his share of bylines and viral projects like "Secret Order of the Slice." PAST BYLINES: Gear Patrol, PC Mag, Geek.com, Digital Photo Pro, Resource Magazine, Yahoo! News, Yahoo! Finance, IGN, PDN, and others. EXPERIENCE: Chris Gampat began working in tech and art journalism both in 2008. He started at PCMag, Magnum Photos, and Geek.com. He founded the Phoblographer in 2009 after working at places like PDN and Photography Bay. He left his day job as the Social Media Content Developer at B&H Photo in the early 2010s. Since then, he's evolved as a publisher using AI ethically, coming up with ethical ways to bring in affiliate income, and preaching the word of diversity in the photo industry. His background and work has spread to non-profits like American Photographic Arts where he's done work to get photographers various benefits. His skills are in SEO, app development, content planning, ethics management, photography, Wordpress, and other things. EDUCATION: Chris graduated Magna Cum Laude from Adelphi University with a degree in Communications in Journalism in 2009. Since then, he's learned and adapted to various things in the fields of social media, SEO, app development, e-commerce development, HTML, etc. FAVORITE SUBJECT TO PHOTOGRAPH: Chris enjoys creating conceptual work that makes people stare at his photos. But he doesn't get to do much of this because of the high demand of photography content. / BEST PHOTOGRAPHY TIP: Don't do it in post-production when you can do it in-camera.
You might also like
lightroom-cc-profiles
Features

After 6+ Months with Capture One, I’m Coming Back to Lightroom

3 Mins read
06/30/2018

If you have been reading the internet for the last year or two you would have been hard-pressed not to notice the uptick in photographers that were unhappy with Adobe Lightroom and it’s nearly constant performance issues. Unsurprisingly, this also is when we started to really see a rise in photographers denouncing Lightroom in favor of PhaseOne’s Capture One Pro, a longtime favorite of professional retouchers that hadn’t really caught on with the masses.

Chris Gampat The Phoblographer Sigma 35mm f1.4 product shots (3 of 7)ISO 2001-60 sec at f - 16
Lenses

Review: Sigma 35mm f1.4 DG HSM (Canon EF)

7 Mins read
01/21/2013

A while back, we completed our first impressions of the Sigma 35mm f1.4 EX; and the lens swayed me to switch over my entire system to Sigma. We’ve taken a little longer with the review than other publications have for a very good reason. First off, we sent the lens to Sigma to ensure that it was properly calibrated. The results that we were getting were stellar; but perhaps there was some magic in the elements that we weren’t totally seeing. The lens came back in a matter of two days: which tells me that everything was stellar and working fine.