Review: Olympus EPM2

by Chris Gampat on 03/03/2013

Chris Gampat The Phoblographer Olympus EPM2 product photos (1 of 5)ISO 16001-60 sec at f - 4.0

The Olympus EPM2 is the successor to the EPM1: a camera that was very much the barebones of the Olympus PEN system. With the upgrade to the EPM2 though, the camera is in many ways the EP3 but even better in many aspects. Targeted at the user that wants something very simple, it can indeed be that type of a camera providing that you don’t go digging through the menus. Once you do that, you subject yourself to a couple of user problems that might not be the easiest to deal with.

Despite those inconveniences, the camera can still wow you at times. Oh, and before you ask, the strap in the image is the from the Olympus Pen Premium Case.

Pros and Cons

Pros

- Very fast autofocusing

- The addition of the touchscreen made the EPM series much more user friendly

- Excellent image quality with very sharp photos

- Extremely versatile RAW files

Cons

- Menu after menu, after menu

- Image quality not as good as competing products

- Totally not for an advanced user

Gear Used

For this review we used the Olympus EPM2 with the Sigma 19mm f2.8, 30mm f2.8, and 14-42mm kit lens.

Tech Specs

Specs taken from the Adorama page listing

Lens Mount Micro Four Thirds
Camera Format Micro Four Thirds (2x Crop Factor)
Pixels 16 Megapixel
Sensor Type / Size MOS, 17.3 x 13 mm
File Formats Still Images: JPEG, MPO
Dust Reduction System Yes
Noise Reduction No
Memory Card Type SD
SDHC
SDXC
Image Stabilization Optical
Video Recording Yes, NTSC/PAL
Audio Recording With Video, Stereo
Focus Type Auto & Manual
Viewfinder Type LCD Display
Display Screen 3.0″ Rear Screen Tilting LCD
Live View Yes
ISO Sensitivity Auto, 100-25600
Burst Rate Up to 8 fps at 16 MP
Guide No. 10′ (3.05 m) ISO200
External Flash Connection Hot Shoe
Continuous Shooting Up to 8 fps
Wi-Fi Capable With Optional Transmitter: Yes
Focal Length 14 – 42 mm
Comparable Four Thirds and Micro 4/3 Focal Length: 28 – 84 mm
Aperture Maximum: f/3.5 – 5.6
Minimum: f/22 – 22
Angle of View 75deg. – 29deg.
Minimum Focus Distance 9.84″ (250mm)
Magnification 0.24x
Maximum Reproduction Ratio 1:4.16
Groups/Elements 8/9
Diaphragm Blades 7
Autofocus Yes
Lens: Image Stabilization No
Filter Thread Front: 40.5 mm
Dimensions (D x L) 2.44 x 1.71″ (6.20 x 4.34 cm)
Weight 5.29oz (150 g)

Ergonomics

Chris Gampat The Phoblographer Olympus EPM2 product photos (2 of 5)ISO 16001-60 sec at f - 4.0

Being designed for noobs (yes, I called them noobs. Deal with it) the EPM2 has a very simplistic and stylish look to it. Part of this look comes from the front–which is characterized by a low-profile grip and a lens release. Above the release is the AF assist bulb.

Chris Gampat The Phoblographer Olympus EPM2 product photos (3 of 5)ISO 16001-60 sec at f - 4.0

The EPM2 is slightly more complicated than its predecessor. In fact, I wouldn’t even say it’s complicated but that instead it builds on cumulative knowledge. With that said, there is a Live Guide (for auto modes) and custom function button, shutter release, on/off button, stereo microphones, hot shoe, and speakers all on the top.

Chris Gampat The Phoblographer Olympus EPM2 product photos (4 of 5)ISO 16001-60 sec at f - 4.0

 

Once you get to the back of the camera, you start to see the serious business that happens–well, not really. The back of the camera is once again simplistic though there are design choices that I question. For example, the top-back-left is home to the playback and delete button. Because I am a veteran Olympus user, I couldn’t get used to it. The top right houses the record video button; which was simple to figure out and understand.

There is also a menu button, info button, and dial that controls various things as well during shooting if you’re in the more advanced modes (PSAM).

Build Quality

The Olympus EPM2 is the most plasticky feeling of the Pen line of cameras. It it a camera that is specifically targeted towards what the marketing realm would call, “Soccer moms” for lack of a better statement. After advising said target market for years, I can tell you from experience that cameras get dropped or overall people generally do stupid things with them. At CES, I seriously saw a guy take a mirrorless camera, take the lens off, and then put the camera in his pocket without putting a body cap on.

If said market is going for a camera like this, they should be made much tougher.

Ease of Use

Chris Gampat The Phoblographer Olympus EPM2 product photos (5 of 5)ISO 16001-60 sec at f - 4.0

If you’re leaving the camera on auto and doing nothing else but shooting away, then you’ll have no problems at all. It’s when you start to try to do more manual functions that things start to get hairy. You’ll need to go into a menu, and then another menu and then unlock two more and then go into another menu.

If you’re going to set the camera to aperture priority and shoot like there is no tomorrow though, by all means go ahead–the experience will feel positively liberating.

Autofocusing

Chris Gampat The Phoblographer Olympus EPM2 Review Photos even more (1 of 11)ISO 4001-15 sec at f - 2.8

In our tests, we found that using Olympus lenses gave the best results for focusing speed. Overall though, every lens focussed very accurately on any subject that we asked it to. It’s only when it came to speed that Olympus took the lead–and quite well too.

Image Quality

Chris Gampat The Phoblographer Olympus EPM2 Review Photos even more (11 of 11)ISO 2001-200 sec at f - 2.8

 

The EPM2 borrows the sensor of its bigger brother: the OMD EM5. Why Olympus chose to do this escapes me, perhaps it’s a cost issue. Regardless, that means that the EPM2 delivers some extremely awesome image quality with the files being punchy, film-like, detailed, able to control noise well, and versatile as well.

High ISO Results

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

 

The EPM2, like the EPL5 and OMD, should be paired with fast glass–and unfortunately I sometimes believe that f2.8 is too slow in the Micro Four Thirds world. This forces the user to crank up the high ISO if needed. Above 6400, we would deem this camera’s image quality unusable. However, at 6400 the RAW files can still retain dots of detail and the image noise can be muted quite easily with Adobe Lightroom 4 without too much detail loss.

ISO 1600 is where you start to see the faintest hints of noise but it won’t become very noticeable until ISO 3200. Even then, I would and have regularly used the camera at ISOs that high.

Just remember to shoot RAW. If you want though, remember that Olympus has built in stabilization that works very well. So while keeping ISO levels down, I have also shot as very slow shutter speeds and thanks to the IS system, didn’t suffer from any blur.

RAW File Versatility

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

The images from Olympus EPM2 were tested in Adobe Lightroom 4 and Capture One Pro. First off, this sensor captures skin tones similar to what one would experience with Kodak Portra, but the photo next to this section was quite a challenge to begin with. Liz’s skin is a bit pinkish in hue because she was freezing until we stepped into the Chocolate Factory together.

Plus she’s wearing Pink and a Red hat. The image shown here was edited in Adobe Lightroom 4.

Capture One Pro has the option of white balancing for a skin tone–which is absolutely wonderful for studio work. However, in this case it threw off the overall color of the image and added way too much green that I didn’t want.

Adobe Lightroom essentially did the same thing–but the best way to white balance in this program is to use the eye-dropper tool. Balancing the image off of a neutral gray area, I was getting the same white balance from Capture One. The solution was to white balance the entire image first and then use Adobe’s White Balance brush to fix her skin. I didn’t do that in the image displayed, but the EPM2′s raw files would have very much been able to handle this sort of editing–the color depth is excellent but not as good as its APS-C sensor competitors.

Now let’s take this into consideration–no one buying this camera may ever sit there and tinker with the RAW files the way I did in two different programs. It makes absolutely no sense. But the fact that the files were still capable of achieving the success that I talked about means that the image quality is more than good enough for most of the people that this camera is targeted towards.

End of questions–if you disagree go back to some Photography Forum where you belong.

Extra Image Samples

 

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA Chris Gampat The Phoblographer Olympus EPM2 Review Photos even more (2 of 11)ISO 4001-800 sec at f - 4.0 Chris Gampat The Phoblographer Olympus EPM2 Review Photos even more (3 of 11)ISO 4001-800 sec at f - 4.0 Chris Gampat The Phoblographer Olympus EPM2 Review Photos even more (4 of 11)ISO 2001-1600 sec at f - 2.8 Chris Gampat The Phoblographer Olympus EPM2 Review Photos even more (5 of 11)ISO 64001-60 sec at f - 2.8 Chris Gampat The Phoblographer Olympus EPM2 Review Photos even more (6 of 11)ISO 64001-125 sec at f - 2.8 Chris Gampat The Phoblographer Olympus EPM2 Review Photos even more (7 of 11)ISO 64001-80 sec at f - 2.8 Chris Gampat The Phoblographer Olympus EPM2 Review Photos even more (8 of 11)ISO 2001-200 sec at f - 4.0 Chris Gampat The Phoblographer Olympus EPM2 Review Photos even more (9 of 11)ISO 2001-640 sec at f - 4.0 Chris Gampat The Phoblographer Olympus EPM2 Review Photos even more (10 of 11)ISO 5001-60 sec at f - 2.8

Conclusions

The Olympus EPM2 is not meant for advanced users, and so they should stay away from it. This is a camera meant for the person in your life with the set-it-and-forget-it type of personality. It is a camera that I would give to my mom but would still implore her to use the manual because of the fact that she is not very tech savvy at all. In fact, she can’t even connect a camera to a computer. With that said, Olympus also needs to move away from their proprietary USB port and cable.

However, the camera has the fast focusing system, excellent LCD screen and stellar image quality going for it–and that’s really all the crowd wants.

Please Support The Phoblographer

We love to bring you guys the latest and greatest news and gear related stuff. However, we can’t keep doing that unless we have your continued support. If you would like to purchase any of the items mentioned, please do so by clicking our links first and then purchasing the items as we then get a small portion of the sale to help run the website.

Also, please follow us on FacebookFlickr and Twitter.

  • ezekiel_e

    As a professional photographer I always find my self walking out the door with by bulky camera rig to shoot my kids everyday stuff etc.. This would set up would be idea and much more convenient.

  • Markus Arike

    The article says “The EPM2, like the EPL5 and OMD, should be paired with fast glass–and unfortunately I sometimes believe that f2.8 is too slow in the Micro Four Thirds world”.

    But aren’t you the one who chose to use the Sigma 19 2.8 for this review? You could have easily picked the 20 1.7, 17 1.8 or 25 1.4 so your criticism is a bit odd.

    The reviewer writes: “End of questions–if you disagree go back to some Photography Forum where you belong.”

    So only people who agree with your opinions should read your blog? Sounds good.

    • ChrisGampat

      Sometimes us reviewers don’t always have equipment like that available to us. Another staffer is reviewing the 17mm f1.8.

      You’ve been trolling this site hard all day dude.

      • Tom

        I totally agree with Markus. If you don’t have the equipment then don’t do the review. I could easily put on a 16mm f2.8 on a Sony Nex and conclude that the image quality of Nex primes are terrible, but that doesn’t make sense at all. If you want to help people by doing the reviews please at least be logical.

        • ChrisGampat

          And when I put the Voigtlander 17.5mm f0.95 on it, you still would bitch.
          *Chris Gampat*
          Chris Gampat Photography

          • Tom

            And this is how you respond to constructive criticism. Ok I will just go back to some Forums where I belong (DPreview, 43rumors, Mu43…), and make a screen shot of this thread to let people know what this blog is like. I am sure that won’t affect your blog at all because you don’t need readers like us.

            • ChrisGampat

              You’re not being constructive, but go for it.

              *Chris Gampat*
              Chris Gampat Photography

    • Delphititan

      I clicked through to this site by a site that I do frequently look to for useful information. I am disappointed that a respected site would post a link to this foolishness. The reviewer tells the reader to “deal with it” as he uses silly terms to refer to types of photographers. He contradicts himself within the text of the review. He doesn’t have the appropriate gear needed to conduct a truly valid review of the camera being reviewed. He cannot maintain a sense of civility when people comment on his review.

      Why would anyone visiting this web site one time ever return?
      Dan

  • Pingback: A new review of Olympus E-PM2 - Blog for micro four third and competing cameras

  • Bora

    You said image quality not as good as competing products in cons. And in conclusion, you said stellar image quality. Please mention some competing products (price wise of course) that have better IQ.

Previous post:

Next post: