The Phoblographer

Photography: Think Simpler

4 Reasons Why the Fuji X10 Isn’t Just a Fashion Accessory

with 25 comments

“Holy crap, it’s pretty.” Those are the words right out of Copy Editor Julius Motal’s mouth when I showed him the Fujifilm X10 (or Fuji X10). Indeed, as I sat in on the conference call with Fujifilm’s reps, my mind went crazy as I got all hot and sweaty thinking about the naughty things I would do to it when I got my hands on it later on about just what the Fuji X10 might look like after talking about the specs. But underneath it all, the Fuji X10 seems to be a powerhouse on the inside.

And yes, we realize that it looks just like the Fuji X100.

Tech Specs

Build Quality

The Fuji X10 is a point and shoot camera with an aluminum chasis and magnesium alloy top and bottom plates. Does more really need to be said? How many point and shoots have that or type of build quality?

All fanboy-ish praise aside, many other point and shoot cameras have plastic bodies, which is more than good enough for most users. But this camera seems specifically targeted not only to the enthusiast, but also to the professional that purchases something like the Olympus XZ-1 or Canon G12.

Hell, if someone tries to rob you, you could probably beat them over the head with this camera.

Granted, it does not have weather sealing, so don’t expect to take it out in the rain.

To be fair, I really wish that the viewfinder would show you the true depth of field as you focus. While the reps at Fujifilm did mention a prism being in the finder, they stated that it would instead be more like the X100′s. Here’s what it looks like on the X10.

Sorry for having such a small image, it came from the brochure that we got.

Fast Zoom Lens

Let’s be honest here, this isn’t the fastest zoom range. That goes to the Olympus XZ-1 with an f1.8 to f2.5 aperture range. However, f2.0 to f2.8 still isn’t bad considering the next major area of this camera’s design which we will get to in a second.

With a 28-112mm lens, one can go from shooting landscapes to close intimate portraits with the turn of a ring. It reminds me a bit of my Canon 24-105mm f4 L IS that I love so much, but this has a faster zoom range. To boot, there is optical image stabilization in the lens, that means that it will react differently with every single focal length. However, this is a point and shoot, and there are very few moving parts when the camera fires.

More interestingly, you turn the camera on by twisting the zoom lens. Like the X100, it seems that this camera is best used while autofocusing. This is evident from the way the lens is designed. However, I could be wrong.

2/3rds Sized Sensor

So how large is a 2/3rds size sensor? Well that’s bigger than the sensor in the Panasonic LX-5, Leica D-LUX 5, Canon G10, Nikon P7100, Olympus XZ-1 and Canon S95. Here’s a chart from the folks over at Photozone.de:

So while this isn’t as large as a Micro Four Thirds sensor, it still is quite large for a point and shoot camera. With that in mind, don’t expect large amounts of gorgeous creamy bokeh in your images unless you’re focusing really closely depending on your focal length. You’ll need not only a fast lens, but at least a Foveon chip to really take advantage of the lens’s fast aperture.

To be fair, that faster aperture should keep ISO levels down when shooting. Want that bokeh? Go get a Fuji X100. But if only it came in black

By the way, the X10 only comes in black.

Portable Size

Portable sizes are great for many reasons. Besides being small enough to carry around everywhere with you (which is a big need for street photography) it is also discreet. So you can throw this in your day bag and go. More than that though, it also has a decent zoom range and large sensor to boot in such a small package.

That’s perfect for those that actually have started to use cameras like these as fashion accessories. And trust me, there are lots of them. With that said, this will still do a great job in a seasoned vet’s hands, and while it is targeted toward that crowd, take note of the auto scene settings on the camera dial and pray that you see less hipsters walking around with this camera.

Fujifilm has yet to announce the price, but it should be available in early November 2011.

Please Support The Phoblographer

We love to bring you guys the latest and greatest news and gear related stuff. However, we can’t keep doing that unless we have your continued support. If you would like to purchase any of the items mentioned, please do so by clicking our links first and then purchasing the items as we then get a small portion of the sale to help run the website.

Related posts:

  1. Street Photography Showdown: Leica M9-P vs Olympus EP3 vs Fuji X100
  2. How the Fuji X100 Retaught Me Street Photography

Written by Chris Gampat

September 1st, 2011 at 1:00 am

  • Pingback: Fuji X10 is now official | Photo Rumors

  • Pingback: Fuji X10 is now official | | What Is PhotographyWhat Is Photography

  • Jc_wilson

    Why does Fuji expect us to pay $600 for a top end point-and-shoot to peer through an archaic optical zoom finder. Without either an articulated screen, or more importantly, an EVF that’s available on the LX-5 or the XZ-1 this all too cute offering will be at a significant disadvantage. Then too there’s the price – you can get an E-PL3 with a larger sensor, EVF capability and articulated screen for about the same prices as the X10. Very pretty, and great spec sheet but there’s something missing in the analysis.

    • Florent_P

      I think that this camera has been developped for people who will prefer a built-in optical finder to an EVF. For them, this fuji seems to be a very good product, because it will be compared to canon G12 and Nikon P7100 (the only two having a OVF). Concerning the price, it does not seem too high (for me) because having a good OVF and manual zooming for “only” 100$ more than the others is correct. Of course, EPL-3 has bigger sensor, and LX5 and XZ-1 can have an EVF, but i don’t want an external  (electronic) finder. This camera is not for everyone, but i think that it will have his public.

      • Anonymous

        I generally think people are forgetting that the G12 and P7100 don’t have the build quality of this camera, plus there is a larger sensor.

    • Chad W.

      The X10 clearly targets the significant market that the G12 and P7100 resides in, and looks to best both those cameras. Keep in mind that the price includes a zoom lens that is all most users will ever need, so they don’t need to juggle lenses like on m4/3. And it will certainly be more compact than the m4/3 kit zooms.

      I agree that the E-PL3 comes out ahead in most comparisons but there is still a significant market for people who want to shoot traditionally through an “archaic” OVF. You only have the option for a clunky add-on EVF with the E-PL3 which raises the cost and lowers convenience.

      No, I think this is a very nice package that is priced accordingly. Ideally I would have liked to see it come in at $500 but depending on demand, we might see that price point sooner than later.

      • Tom

        I keep seeing a modernized version of the classic Leica Digilux 2/Panasonic LC-1 in this.  Point and shoot sized sensor (by Fuji!), excellent fixed zoom lens (hoping for something vaguely like the exceptional Vario-Summilux 28-90 eq. from the Leica/Panny) and good manual controls.  The Digilux2 did have an evf, not an optical finder, and was much larger.  But the truth is that camera still makes wonderful images within the limits of its physics.  This could be another sweetheart.

        Also:  though used versions of the Panny/Leica can be had for $600-900, still, five years after hte last were made, it retailed at $1500(Panny) $1800 (red dot premium) — and this, compared to that, is cheap.

        Now the big question is the lens, which is where the money went in the Leica.  But if its decent, then this doesn’t sound bad at all to me.

        • TomN

          Have to agree with you Tom. The Digilux 2/LC1 sets a great precedent for this camera technically. Add in the retro looks, solid build and you have a camera that should build a solid following.
          Would love to buy this for my sister, currently using a Panny P&S. She composes really well, can’t be bothered with changing lenses, and needs better IQ without having to learn the whole “process”.
          The fact it looks so cool wouldn’t hurt either.

  • http://www.photoblog.ie patrick

    Looks very nice to me. Still expensive but a lot more affordable than the it’s bigger brother.

    • Anonymous

      For what’s in it, it seems expensive, but when you consider the sensor and build quality, I’d be alright with it.

    • Anonymous

      Expensive? The price haven`t been announced yet.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=26110204 Mike Zawadzki

    Pointless fashion accessory

    • Anonymous

      Bollocks.
      Great form/factor. Good as a second camera to carry all around.

  • http://twitter.com/new1_web_design Donald Peterson

    You may not consider the Fuji X10 a fashion accessory . . . but do you think we’re all buying iphones and Macs because of the technology? We’re buying them because of aesthetics and design! And I for one am not ashamed to admit that I will buy the X10 because of that all-metal rangefinder good looks and how it feels and functions in the hand.

    This is the workingman’s Leica. Seeing the X10 for the first time brought back to mind to elegance of the Yashica Electro 35 and other affordable rangefinder cameras that just made that act of shooting a pleasure because of their design. The specs are a given. All serious digital cameras are capable image makers. The X10 taps into a deep aesthetic vein that few modern cameras have found. I am buying this one because of the looks.

    http://petersonlive.com

  • donfelipe

    Hah, this camera is Made in Japan! That alone should make it worth the price. When everyone else is making their compacts dirt cheap in sub par factories, I believe you get what you pay for.

  • Spoorthy Vemula

    looks like the pentax Q with a bigger screen and no interchangable lenses

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_E3PHOEHNS7VE7OCTA3OE4N3HEA Edward Junior

    I like with Fuji products. Hope this new product can have the same with the last good one!

  • McNab

    The 4/3″ sensor is NOT 18 x 13,5 mm as indicated. As specified by Olympus the 4/3″ and hence the m4/3″ system sensor is exactly half the diagonal of that of the 35 x 24 mm format. Usually with the proportion 4:3 this gives 17.3 x 13 mm.
    http://www.four-thirds.org/en/fourthirds/whitepaper.html

  • Ruhayatx

    Any chance you can show us a pic of this Fuji next to similar cameras (LX5/XZ1 etc) or CSCs (X100/Panasonic GF3/Olympus EPM3)?

    • Anonymous

      When I get my hands on it, sure.

      Chris Gampat,
      Editor in Chief
      The Phoblographer

  • Pingback: Fujifilm announces its new X-series camera, the X10 – Digitaltrends.com

  • Pingback: EXCLUSIVE Hands On Review: Shooting a Party with the Fuji X10 at The Phoblographer

  • bill

    congratulations on a dying art- proper use of the word “discreet” – many, many pro journalists and writers should be ashamed because they confuse it with “discrete” – or actually think they are the same word          !!

    • Anonymous

      I honestly never get it right.

      Kudos to Julius Motal, the site’s Copy Editor.

      -Chris Gampat
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/ChrisGampat
      Chrisgampat.tumblr.com

  • Pingback: EXCLUSIVE Hands On Review: Shooting a Party with the Fuji X10 | StudioM Photo