Hands On: Sony A55, A560 and 24mm F2 ZA SSM

by Chris Gampat on 08/24/2010

Sony announced the new A55, A560 and 24mm F2 lens and earlier this evening, I got to play with those items at a private Sony event at the Alvin Ailey Dance Studio in NYC. Impressions, findings and images are after the jump. Please do note that I handled pre-production units and that all these photos were shot in JPEG mode.

A55

The Sony A55 is an extremely small DSLR. I don’t have big hands, but when my fingers cuff the grip, my pinky finger ended up not touching the camera. It truly is the smallest DSLR I’ve ever held and feels even smaller than the Panasonic DMC-GH1(a camera without a mirror at all.)

The camera is actually still very fairly simple to use in manual mode. Choosing the autofocus settings is simple as is selecting which focusing point one wants to use. The reason why this is important because of the audience that this camera is targeted towards. This feature though is displayed similarly to the NEX-5.

Sony has done something that every photographer wants when buying a camera targeted at this level: users are able to change essentially every single setting while looking into the viewfinder. To do this, just look in and press the Fn button for the display to come up. This way the camera never has to leave eye-level. From the custom menu that is displayed the user can change things from ISO, white balance (with live preview), shooting drive, etc.

The camera, like Nikon, has its own settings for Autofocus and Manual focus. The lenses also behave this way.

The flash seems to come up higher than on ordinary DSLRs which will help to illuminate subjects better.

One of my favorite features is the articulating LCD screen. This will be instrumental to videographers and when combined with the full-time phase detect AF, many videographers will be simply floored with the performance.

And it really is that fast. Granted, it only shoots super fast in the 10FPS shooting mode which essentially takes over the camera and puts it in a Program mode of some sort.

To be honest, while sitting through the presentation I couldn’t help but think to myself, “What professional photographer needs to shoot that many frames and uses an APS-C sized sensor camera?” The answer: it’s not meant for pros. Shooting the dancers reminded me of that. And the average person loves to shoot cameras like they’re machine guns. Granted so do some sports photographers, but they’re only in short bursts.

However, I can imagine that a consumer will probably have the same look on my face as I did when I imported over 400 photos into Lightroom. I haven’t had a look on my face like that since shooting a wedding, but at least I got paid for that.

It must be noted that Sony has done a great job with the autofocus. The constant phase detect AF worked wonderfully. For the burst photos above, I set the focusing point to the dancer’s face. Admittedly, I’m not satisfied with the photos but they serve the purpose of demonstrating the burst function. Additionally, these are pre-production units.

Now, I did shoot videos, but as you’ll read in the Sony NEX-5review, I’ve been having issues having them to work on my MacBook. Copy Editor Julius Motal is a Sony shooter, and is trying it out for himself. Perhaps we will figure out the solution soon.

A560

The A560 was a camera that felt more like the type of camera that I would use despite the fact that I found its image performance to not be on par with the A55 but its processing speed to be faster. Once again though, these were pre-production units.

The grip and body of the A560 feel very good. Not as excellent as the Sony A850or the Sony A900and even A700 felt, but I could see myself shooting concerts with it.

Something that needs to be kept in mind is that the A560 cannot autofocus in video mode at all, according to the Sony PR reps. If you’re a photographer or prefer to manually focus anyway the most cinematographers do, then you’ll have no problem. The buttons aren’t as close together on the back since the camera body is considerably larger. Whether or not those are your preferences for a DSLR that shoots video is really up to the user.

My only critique would be that I wish they would have incorporated a back dial to change the aperture.

The top is characterized by less settings on the mode dial than the lower model as well as a Live View/OVF switch. Unlike the A55, some setting will not be able to be manipulated unless the user takes their eye away from the viewfinder.

The autofocus performance is speedy, and actually very smart based upon your composition of the subjects.

Granted, this was all shot in great lighting. Photographer Brian Smith, who was on set to give us demos, assured me that these are the cameras that you’d want to use to shoot in terrible lighting because of the revamped autofocus. When I asked about these (the A560 and A55) over the full frame models, he stated that the higher models are all about resolution and these are more about performance.

To be honest with you, I agree with him. The focusing on this camera seems a tad bit better than some Canon models I’ve been testing. Once again though, I’d like to remind readers that all products handled were pre-productions units.

Though I would like to comment that Sony’s menus have been cleaned up from the catastrophe that I consider the NEX-5′s to be but still aren’t as simple or great as the A-850′s or A900′s are.

24mm F2 ZA SSM

On an APS-C body, the 24mm F2 ZA SSM lens is about 36mm. It is fast and actually fairly light. The build of the lens seems very solid. It isn’t a large lens, but the lens hood makes it seem much larger and more intimidating than it is really is. When talking to Brian about it, I commented that it has a speedy autofocus and seems to give no distortion in the images.

That means that if you’re photographing dancers, they will be surely getting ready for their closeup and you’ll be getting ready to prep yourself for perhaps being knocked down. No one was, thankfully.

These were all shot on the A55 using the 10 shot burst mode. If it were up to me, I would’ve had some fill-flash on the subjects but myself and another journalist only found the flashes at the end of the event.

Please Support the Phoblographer

We love to bring you guys the latest and greatest news and gear related stuff. However, we can’t keep doing that unless we have your continued support. If you would like to purchase any of the items mentioned, please do so by clicking our links first and then purchasing the items as we then get a small portion of the sale to help run the website.

  • Pingback: Sony Alpha33, Alpha55, Alpha 560 and Alpha580 announced | Photo Rumors

  • Pingback: HOT! Sony α33 and α55 with translucent mirror, EVF and video! « efix:photography

  • Pingback: Sony SLT Alpha A33 and A55 DSLR with Continuous Video Auto-Focus | David's Simple Photography

  • Chris

    Thanks for the review.

    Please tell me where you got the a55 strap shown on above photos. I’ve been looking for a small strap with compact hooks for a long time. Thanks.

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      Hey Chris,

      Thanks for the comment. That strap is actually part of a compact camera case for my sister’s Canon SX100. I’m borrowing it for the Leica M7 review. Your best bet would be to try B&H or Amazon. If you want further recommendations, shoot me an email.

  • Pingback: sonyalpharumors | Home

  • Pingback: Top Posts — WordPress.com

  • Pingback: Sony a33 en a55 - Belgiumdigital forum - Digitale fotografie

  • John cassan

    Has anyone tested it on horse racing.That should be an ultimate test.

  • Dereck

    Hey I am looking to get the a55 for american football team photos and game photos – do you think its a good camera? I mean you said you didnt like the pics, how come ? they look a little dark but thats all really – would you recommend the a55? thanks for any help

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      Hey Dereck,

      I think it’s an excellent camera. My settings were off and I shot in JPEG. We’re going to try to get a unit in for review to showcase better images.

      • Dereck

        thanks for the speedy reply- I am an ex university and current senior team american football player – I was hoping to go back to the uni team and take photos. I was looking at a canon 50d But balm they dont make it any more lol. Now this is coming out and I thought it sounds too good to be true lol

        • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

          If you don’t have lenses already then sure. If you’re in a system already, it’s only smarter to move up the line.

  • Dereck

    not got a Dslr or anything just yet – my parents have a canon 500d I wanted a 50d for the 6.3 fps.

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      Then it’s better off to just go Canon since you can share lenses, no?

  • Dereck

    my folks think i would break their lens, so not an option lol

  • Peter

    Chris,
    I am looking to buy a new DSLR. (You know what is coming :-) )
    I am wondering if I should go with the Canon 60D or the Sony A55. After using both the units what is your take on it? Thanks.

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      Totally different question. A55 is smaller and has full time phase detect AF, plus an EVF and can shoot much faster than the 60D. 60D is tougher, has an optical viewfinder and shoots in a codec that is easier to edit in my experience. It’s really up to personal preference in that case, especially with the viewfinder.

      • Peter

        Thank you very much for your reply.
        The only reason I am worried about going with Sony is the availability of good lenses on a budget. I won’t have money to shell out on their Carl Zeiss line. I know Canon has some good (not L) budget lenses. What do you think about Sony/Minolta line? Your response will be much appreciated.

        • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

          You’ll have to forgive me then Peter. When you wrote to me, I didn’t think that you thought that far into the future about your investment. First off, I commend you on thinking smart. And you’re right, Canon has a much larger abundance of lenses at a more affordable price. The Sony/Minolta line is pretty solid though. Julius, our Copy Editor, is a Minolta film shooter. His 50mm F/1.7 is pretty nice but much better stopped down. The higher end glass in the line like the 135mm F/1.8 and 85mm F/1.4 are why some wedding photographers switched to Sony. In my opinion, nothing beats the Canon 50mm F/1.8 stopped down though in the tight budget line. In this case, the Canon 60D would be a much better option for you. I recommend the 50mm F/1.4, 85mm F/1.8 (one of my favorites) and the 35mm F/2. If you’re shooting video, get a Rode Shotgun mic perhaps. What exactly will you be shooting?

          Also, please remember to support the site by making your purchases through Amazon or B&H by clicking on our product links.

  • Peter

    Chris,
    Thanks for your detailed and thought out reply. To answer your question, I mostly shoot portraits & landscapes. I travel a bit, and I would say landscapes more than portraits.I have a panasonic super-zoom (FZ35) with HD video and I have found that I don’t use video as much as I imagined I would. It could be different with an SLR though. I am really excited by the technology that is offered by Sony in A55, but I am afraid the lenses available for my budget will fall short of my expectations and I will have to move to another system. I would really like to stick with one system if possible. But, thank you very much again for your replies, and yes, I shall use the links on your site when I make a purchase.

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      If you’re shooting mostly landscapes then to be honest with you then you’re better off with the original 5D or a 5D Mk II because your wide angles will be wider. I’m smitten with Dahlia (my 5D Mk II) as my ambient body and Evelyn (7D) as my flash body. The combo work well together. If you go with the 60D though, you’ll probably be happy with it. Note the older AF system in there.

  • Armanius

    Thanks for the review! I just to an A55, and I’m loving it so far. I’m considering the Zeiss 24 to give me a 36mm EFL. Wanted to use it as a walkaround lens for street shooting. How did you like the balance of the A55 + Zeiss 24? The 24 seems about the same size as my Zeiss 16-80, but definitely heavier. Did you feel that the A55 + Zeiss 24 was too front heavy? Or too big? Thanks for your input.

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      Hi Armanius,

      I had no problem with the Zeiss 24mm and the A55. Believe it or not, all of the Zeiss and Sony glass was fine, even the 135mm F/1.8! In fact, that’s perhaps my favorite lens.

      I actually think that if I owned the A55 that the 24mm would live on it, especially for street photography.

      I hope this helps, but if you’ve got other questions shoot them my way. if you plan to make purchases, please use our links and banners.

  • Pingback: Hands-on with the Sony a580 at The Phoblographer

  • Pingback: Canon 60D gets its butt kicked by the Sony Alpha 55 & Nikon D90 at The Phoblographer

  • Pingback: Three Hints On How Canon Will Try to Kill The Sony A55 at The Phoblographer

  • Pingback: DSLR Buyers Guide, Winter 2010 at The Phoblographer

  • Pingback: What’s In the Bag? Sony Artisan Brian Smith at The Phoblographer

Previous post:

Next post: