The Phoblographer

Photography: Think Simpler

Why Your Lenses are More Important Than Your Camera

with 7 comments

For professionals reading this blog, the importance of lenses is old hat. However, for casual users who are considering getting their first DSLR, they might not understand just how vital having the right lenses is for shooting. A good lens means everything in getting the right shot. It’s not just the amount of zoom you have or how wide it can get, but the quality of the glass, the maximum size of the aperture, and other characteristics.

Before we go into the options, let’s look at some of the basics of lenses. Every camera lens has two main attributes: focal length and f-stop. The focal length determines how close or how wide you can get with the lens; an 18mm lens can produce a very wide angle shot, while a 200mm lens can get you very close to the subject. The f-stop determines how wide the aperture can open; a lens that can reach f/1.4 will be much brighter than one that can only reach f/4.0. You can learn more about these concepts in our Beginner’s Guide to Photography Terminology.

Some people only pay attention to the focal length. This is particularly a problem with compact cameras, which are always happy to talk about how powerful the zoom is. Indeed, it can be nice to get close to the subject with a telephoto lens, but it’s not always the best choice, and if it’s not particularly bright you’ll find it worthless in most situations. Unless you know you absolutely need the powerful zoom, you’ll generally get far better shots with a 50mm f/1.4 lens than a 200mm f/4.0 lens.

In the end, your lenses dictate what type of shots you can take. Indoor shots, outdoor shots, close-up shots, landscape shots, daytime shots, and nighttime shots are made or broken because of your lens. A few weeks ago, I wrote a guide on Tested.com explaining how to choose your first SLR lens. It goes over the basic must-have lens types.

35mm, 50mm, and 85mm lens are all extremely useful. While 35mm and 85mm lenses will put you at a better advantage for shooting wide shots and portraits, respectively, a 50mm prime lens works like a swiss army knife for shooters. In all three cases, they’re flexible enough for general use, hovering close enough to midrange that you can use them for most shots in a pinch. The further you get in either direction, whether wide-angle or telephoto, the more specialized (and expensive) the lenses will be, and the harder it will be to take shots not suited specifically for the lens.

It’s tempting to get a “zoom” lens with a variable focal length, so you can move back and forth between distances at your leisure, without changing lenses. This still leads to trade-offs. Zoom lenses are heavier and bulkier, and unless you’re willing to spend a lot of money on them they tend to have inferior glass. Yes, it’s a nuisance to switch lenses, but it’s better to enjoy a proper, crisp photo with the right tool than a muddy photo taken through cheap glass and a tiny aperture.

There’s one last reason your lenses are more important:  they’re probably going to outlive your camera. As long as you use the same brand of SLR (or use an adapter, and don’t mind trading off features like auto-focus), you can keep using your lenses long after your SLR body has corked it. If Canon announces a 10 terapixel SLR a decade down the road, as long as it uses an EF-S lens mount or supports an EF-S adapter, you can use the same 50mm lens you cut your teeth on back in 2005.

In the end, your selection of lenses are some of the most important things in your camera bag. It’s best to use the right tool for the job, and your lenses are those tools. A camera body is obviously vital, but if your glass won’t give you a clear shot at the right distance and speed, you might as well be waving around a shoebox.

Related posts:

  1. The Great Debate: Prime Lenses Vs Zoom Lenses
  2. Quick and Forgotten Tips For 50mm Lens Users
  3. The Best Budget Lenses
  4. A Brief Explanation of Your Camera's Shooting/Scene Modes
  5. The Beginner’s Guide to Photojournalism

Written by Will Greenwald

August 10th, 2010 at 12:56 am

Posted in Learn

Tagged with , , , , , ,

  • Adrian

    Hey Will, with the vast majority of DSLR users owning APS-C cameras, you have to take into account the crop ratio with the three suggested lenses listed above.
    To get similar angles of view, the kit would be a 24/28, 35 and 50+, respectively.

    All the best!
    Adrian

  • http://noelhurtley.com Noel Hurtley

    That’s a good point Adrian, the crop factor is an important metric to keep in mind when buying new glass.

    Thanks for the great article Will, I’ve tweeted about it and hopefully some budding photographers will take your advice to heart.

  • http://www.bvcphoto.com/photothis B

    The general principle is solid, but I think this article falls apart in the details. It’s like writing an article about how fun unciorns are and then saying that unicorns with seven inch horns are way better than unicorns with four inch horns.

    The comparison of a 50mm f/1.4 and a 200mm f/4 is what’s relaly puzzling. You use images of Canon lenses here so assuming you’re talking about canon products, the only 200mm f/4 Canon lens I can think of is an FD macro. Why not use real-world examples? It would be easy enough; compare the Canon 50mm f/1.8 to the f/1.4. Or compare any of a number of megazoom 18-200 or 28-200 lenses to the 70-200L lineup, or the 75-300 III to the 70-300 IS, or the Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 to the 18-55mm kit lenses?

    But there’s another problem. This article focuses on aperture for a couple of paragraphs and seems to say that a wider maximum aperture is a signal of better image quality. This isn’t always true. For example, the f/4 versions of the Canon 70-200L lenses are widely considered to return better image quality than the f/2.8 versions (at least, at f/4 and narrower). There’s a lot more to lens construction and optical quality than simply letting in as much light as possible, and there always has been. Even back in the day, the Pentax 28mm f/3.5 and 135mm f/3.5 lenses were (and still are) considered vastly superior to their more cheaply made f/2.8 counterparts.

    Like unicorns, you have to look at more than just the horn length — uh, I mean, maximum aperture.

    The above point about crop factor is important too; the 50mm f/1.8 is one of the first lenses suggested to anyone with a Canon, but on a cropped sensor body I find it nearly unusable in the situations it’s usually recommended for — low light, indoor shooting. Micro 4/3rds format is another issue. Zoom vs. prime is an argument that I’m not going to resolve but I think this article does a disservice by dismissing zooms altogether. It would be nice to acknowledge that there are plenty of great zoom lenses out there — but, as the general sentiment of the article goes, you have to choose the right one.

    Again, good general advice, I just think that the examples here could be better. Lenses are definitely overlooked by new buyers, and anyway manufacturers can make camera body features sound sexier.

  • Pingback: Another “truth” deconstructed: Is the lens really more important than the camera? « efix:photography

  • Pingback: The Phoblographer’s Guide to The Right Canon Lens For You at The Phoblographer

  • darcy

    true concept, not so good article ..

  • Pingback: Free Manfrotto Webinar Tomorrow On Choosing the Right Lens, Exposure at The Phoblographer