Last Updated on 03/11/2026 by Chris Gampat
Depending on what circle of people I’m talking to, some people consider me more of a birding photographer than a street or portrait photographer. But if you’ve been reading this site for years, you’d know that most of my photographic work involves people. Admittedly, legal blindness makes bird photography tough at times. Even with two eye surgeries way past me, it can still be hard to see things in the world. Luckily, a lens like the Panasonic LUMIX 100-500mm f5-7.1 makes birding photography so insanely easy when coupled with the right cameras. How so? Well, if a blind man with kerataconus can do it, so can you!
Table of Contents
The Big Picture: LUMIX 100-500mm f5-7.1 Review Conclusions
I had to write the conclusion to this review last. The LUMIX 100-500mm f5-7.1 is a good lens — but so is everything else being made these days. But where it excels is with being lightweight, weather resistant, and great at autofocusing. What’s most important is that you actually want to bring it everywhere you hike with you. With that said, it’s not doing anything really unique or special. And for the moment, it’s probably the best option for birding that the L-mount alliance has.
- Weather resistance
- Good autofocus performance
- Class standard image quality
- Very lightweight, I’d want to bring this lens with me around for sure
- The best option of rhe L-mount
- It’s a bit pricier than I think it should be at a bit over $2,000. But blame Trump and his stupid tariffs for that.

The Panasonic LUMIX 100-500mm f5-7.1 deserves the Editor’s Choice award for sure. So I’m giving it 5 out of 5 stars. Want one? Check out the buy now button below.
Experience
The Panasonic LUMIX 100-500mm f5-7.1 that I reviewed was used on the Panasonic S1II E. I’m sending the lens back soon and that body is a long-term loaner. I also own the Leica SL2s and the Panasonic S1R II — and I tested the lens on both of those camera bodies.
100-500mm focal lengths (or around that) are often my favorite lenses for bird photography with high megapixel camera bodies. And if anything, I can always use a teleconverter with just a little bit of extra reach to get the photos I really want. The Panasonic LUMIX 100-500mm f5-7.1 isn’t an exception here. What’s unique to it is the weird zoom locker. And I really mean that when I say that it’s weird because it keeps it from going past 150mm. If anything, I would’ve made it lock at certain focal lengths and only those options. Otherwise, it’s weather resistant, lightweight, and even small. In fact, when attached to the S1II E, I was able to shove it into the Billingham 35 Rucksack bag and even put extra stuff in there. That’s insanely impressive to me because it meant that I could do a long commute with multiple transfers on public transit with ease.
One would think that birding in NYC isn’t possible — but that’s not true at all. It’s considered to be one of the most important migration paths for many birds.
During my review process, I used the lens at Medieval Times for my Birth Month with my best friend and while birding. Typically, I found that the S1R II made the Panasonic LUMIX 100-500mm f5-7.1 lag a bit when autofocusing. With the Leica SL2s, it performed as expected and I’d even say it was pretty solid. But where it really shone is with the Panasonic S1II E — as far autofocus is concerned.
Even when scene detection for birds and animals wasn’t being used, the camera and lens were able to work together to track and focus on birds. For the record, I made photos with the AF-C mode and tracking, wide area, and 1-area AF settings. My keeper rate was high already when using the camera in the low-burst setting.
For the record, the S1R II was pushed to the limit with making photographs in very low light. But it was able to hold up. Additionally, I used both the exposure preview activated and deactivated. I mostly make photographs with this feature deactivated — and the Panasonic LUMIX 100-500mm f5-7.1 did an incredible job.
Just by paying attention, I didn’t think that I really even needed to use the pre-shot burst feature. Combine this with a pair of image stabilized Fujifilm binoculars that I’ve been using for years and I’m all set!
Image Quality
What makes the Panasonic LUMIX 100-500mm f5-7.1 really unique is the fact that it’s on the L-mount system. With L-mount, you can use so many different camera profiles to make images that feel truly special. This is more the case with Panasonic unless you’re using Leica looks. But Leica looks can only be applied in-camera with newer camera models. Otherwise, it can be done via the Leica Fotos app in post-production.
Still, generally speaking there’s nothing unique or special about the image quality here that makes it stand out over Canon and Tamron’s own options. That’s to say that I can’t look at the images and tell which one comes from which lens. In some ways, that’s a good thing to say that it’s on par with the rest of the industry. And if you want something unique from it, you’ll be relying on LUMIX’s really excellent cameras.
Otherwise, within the L-mount alliance, this is probably the best birding lens that you can get your hands on. It’s got good sharpness, nice bokeh, and when you combine it with the Real Time LUT feature, you’re going to get fantastic images.
The following images are unedited.
The following images were edited using the Phoblographer’s presets in Capture One.























































Should You Buy from Panasonic LUMIX?
We believe that everyone should be aware of the ethical decisions that they’re making when they spend money. So to do this, we research the companies that whose products we test and make folks aware of both possible concerns and reasons to feel great about giving a company your money.
Here’s what we’ve got for Panasonic:
- Panasonic works to support women in STEM to address inequalities. We can’t find any more information on that, but it’s worth knowing.
- Panasonic is very transparent about how they use cookies. And you can delete your information if you request so.
- Panasonic has a 30 day refund policy. This goes beyond what many retailers may offer.
- In the owners manuals, Panasonic states that attaching items that don’t comply with the L-mount alliance can void your warranty. You can search the S1R II manual to find this for an example. This means that if you’re using a 3rd party product that isn’t part of the L-mount, you could void your warranty.
- Panasonic has various chemical disclosures. Nothing from the LUMIX camera brand has a disclosure.
- LUMIX has been a supporter of Pride Month in various ways in the past, according to email correspondences the Phoblographer has with the brand. There’s even imagery implying that they’ve given away $15,000 to participants in their Pride Month function.
Declaration of Journalistic Intent
The Phoblographer is one of the last standing dedicated photography publications that speaks to both art and tech in our articles. We put declarations up front in our reviews to adhere to journalistic standards that several publications abide by. These help you understand a lot more about what we do:
- At the time of publishing this review, Panasonic is not running direct-sold advertising with the Phoblographer. This doesn’t affect our reviews anyway and it never has in our 15 years of publishing our articles. This article is in no way sponsored.
- Note that this isn’t necessarily our final review of the unit. It will be updated, and it’s more of an in-progress review than anything. In fact, almost all our reviews are like this.
- None of the reviews on the Phoblographer are sponsored. That’s against FTC laws and we adhere to them just the same way that newspapers, magazines, and corporate publications do.
- Panasonic loaned the unit and accessories to the Phoblographer for review. There was no money exchange between us or their 3rd party partners and the Phoblographer for this to happen. Manufacturers trust the Phoblographer’s reviews, as they are incredibly blunt.
- Panasonic knows that it cannot influence the site’s reviews. If we don’t like something or if we have issues with it, we’ll let our readers know.
- Panasonic paid for shipping of the lens to and back. This is a standard practice in the world of journalism.
- The Phoblographer’s standards for reviewing products have become much stricter. After having the world’s largest database of real-world lens reviews, we choose not to review anything we don’t find innovative or unique, and in many cases, products that lack weather resistance. Unless something is very unique, we probably won’t touch it.
- In recent years, brands have withheld NDA information from us or stopped working with us because they feel they cannot control our coverage. These days, many brands will not give products to the press unless they get favorable coverage. In other situations, we’ve stopped working with several brands for ethical issues. Either way, we report as honestly and rawly as humanity allows.
- At the time of publishing, the Phoblographer is the only photography publication that is a member of Adobe’s Content Authenticity Initiative. We champion human-made art and are frank with our audience. We are also the only photography publication that labels when an image is edited or not.
More can be found on our Disclaimers page.



















