As one part of the world revives film cameras’ soft, fuzzy glow, another part is waging a war for a higher pixel count. At every other camera launch, the first question that a photographer will ask is: “What’s the pixel count?” While we have finally reached the peak of modern cameras, where most devices can make sharp, focused images, the need to beat each other with higher sensor pixels has still not died. If Joseph Nicéphore Niépce was alive today, I bet he would be shocked to see the direction photography is taking. I also believe he would hold his head in his hand when he hears that we have reached a new high of pixel count, thanks to Canon: 250 megapixels. But are such numbers even worth it?
Canon’s 250MP Camera is Wasteful
The company has been creating high-megapixel sensors for a while, which has given hope to photographers. If Sony has a 50MP camera, Leica (and Sony) a 60MP camera, and Fujifilm a 100MP camera, Canon loyalists believe their favorite brand should not shy away. This has even given people the hope that Canon would release a 100MP or a 120MP camera for the EOS R lineup. However, the good news is that these sensors are not for consumers but rather for other scientific or security purposes.
For instance, the 250MP prototype camera that was unveiled in China was actually for security purposes. The device, whose picture was first uploaded on Mirrorless Rumors, was revealed at the China Public Security Expo (Shenzhen). Known as the Canon LI8020SA CMOS sensor, its application is limited to scientific research, security, aerial mapping, aeronautic imaging, and more. At the moment, there is no way that the company will launch something like this for consumers, especially when they are figuring out how to deal with their new goal: catering to content creators.
Now, purely from the standpoint of photography, I think a 250MP camera is a wasteful technology for most. Unless you are someone who wants to create archival work of very rare photographs, paintings, or species on the verge of extinction, such devices are of barely any use. A higher megapixel camera can certainly be helpful when you need to crop your images, print, or create black-and-white photographs. However, these are very specific needs many consumers may not have. Many, instead, prefer to view a picture at 100%, which diminishes the very purpose of photography in the first place.
Higher Megapixels or Boring Innovations
Let’s face it: Phone cameras are quite capable today, and that’s why a large section of society depends on them. However, to distinguish oneself from the average person who “likes” photography, many prefer to switch to digital cameras. But will that make you a better photographer? Certainly no. Will it get you the attention of other photographers? Absolutely. But will you appreciate photography as art after buying a higher pixel camera? Also no. So, why do you need it?
As we mentioned in a previous article, a 24MP camera is good enough to get a big print. And with bigger pixels come other performance issues, which one always complains about. This also makes me wonder: is a larger sensor really the only innovation that’s left? I hope that’s not the case. Just imagine how boring our world would be. It’s also the reason why retro cameras are making a comeback and why more and more emerging artists are breaking free from the clinical images most lenses produce.
In conclusion, a 250MP Canon camera will not solve all your photographic woes. If you think your images look subpar, please don’t blame the sensor. There are other ingredients that also go into the making of an image. Perhaps it is also why you should take some time off and use a micro four thirds or compact camera to shift your perspective. Putting a limit on your sensor could actually help you get out of the megapixel mindset and focus on creating work where every grain can speak for itself. And if you create images that people genuinely like (and I don’t mean strangers on Instagram), then you know exactly where you fell short.
N
T