February 2nd Coined, “Deactivation Day” Citing Google and Getty Image Deal

by Chris Gampat on 01/19/2013

Screen Shot 2013-01-19 at 9.07.55 AM

 

The image sharing wars are heating up even more. First, Instagram lost a ton of followers due to their TOS agreement change. Then a couple of days ago, we reported on a new deal between Google and Getty Images. When Google reported on the new deal on their Drive blog, they announced that “5,000 new photos of nature, weather, animals, sports, food, education, technology, music and 8 other categories are now available for your use in Docs, Sheets, and Slides.” But they weren’t clear on where the images were coming from.

Eventually it was discovered that they were coming from iStock photo. And the concerned comments numbered in the thousands. As a response to this move, users are organizing, and citing February 2nd as their very own, “D-Day.” At the time of reporting on this news, the thread is around 10 pages long. The users think that it is about quick profit and greed.

The users in the thread have mixed feelings. Some don’t want to deactivate all of their images, others will only do some, and more steadfast users are going to go all in and deactivate everything. Of any story in the image sharing world right now, this is the one to watch. iStock photo and stock photos to begin with aren’t very profitable these days, but they’ve sure angered a lot of users.

  • Millicent Graves

    The images came from Getty Images… not IStockphoto. They do host a number of the best files from IStockphoto and about a fifth of the images found on Google Drive were picks from these. Getty Images devised and sold the custom licenses to Google without informing Istockphoto nor any of the other distributed agencies whose photos ended up there. It is purely a Getty Images project and the ire is turned towards them. The deactivation, and collection withdrawal at Istock was initially a protective move to make sure that the participating photographers’ work does not end up in the next batch of artwork distributed for free by Google. It has then evolved into a kind of protest against the sabotaging of the whole Microstock industry by Getty Images and Google.

  • Sheila Smart

    This, of course, affects ALL those who shoot stock because with one foul swoop, Google has saturated the market with freebie images including model released children. God knows where they will end up. I quit Getty last July (that’s another story) and will not be affected by this. I do have a few
    RM images on Getty via AGE but at the moment, only RF are part of this nefarious deal. I have just been banned from the Getty Contributors Forum at Flickr because of my views on this dreadful deal. Getty does not like dissent and instructed Yahoo to ban me. Feb 2 is way too late to quit iStock or Getty/Flickr as hundreds of thousands of RF images will be out there for use as they darn well please.

Previous post:

Next post: