Op ED: My Opinion on The New Nikon D600

by Peter Walkowiak on 09/14/2012

So its here, the cheapest full frame camera ever, the Nikon D600. News of this camera came out last night as I was driving home from San Francisco. It’s everything we expected and nothing more except a bit more money than the initial rumors.

As a full time Nikon photographer I thought that I would share my opinion of the camera. I own the D700 and D800 so I have a good deal of history with the company. I will also mention main critiques made my big names and the little names on blogs.

To start you will have a hard time trying to explain to me why this camera isn’t for you. Even though the camera isn’t the $1,500 camera we thought was coming it is still the most affordable camera in its class to date. I am having a hard time thinking about trading in my D700 for this camera because I think that I will miss the smaller, easier to work with 12mp files. These files are a breeze to work with and compared to the monster 50mb+ RAW files from my D800 these files might as well be a 6mb file from my original D50. When it comes down to it, I do believe I will own a computer in the future that will handle all these large files just as well as my current computer handles the D700 files. You can always increase hard drive space or computer speed but you cannot go back and get more detail in your old files. This is a true fact that will lead to me selling my beloved Nikon D700. If I wanted to add a 12mp camera to my arsenal I would just buy a used D300, simply one of the prettiest CMOS sensors.

I just got done going over all of the specs and it appears that it doesn’t share the same exact metering system as the D800 or D4 (same system) nor does it have the same as the D700. Instead it appears to be the same metering that has existed on the D7000. I am surprised to find this since I (and the internet?) just assumed that the metering also trickled down from the D4 to this camera as well. The other element it does share with the D7000 is a smaller body and frame.

The 39 point system doesn’t scare me off, honestly more is better when it comes to AF points but I started with 5 points on my  D50 and that taught me its all I need. It has a few points along all 4 four corners as well as the center, Im not sure there is much more to ask for. The main reason why I would trade in my D700 for this camera would be the consistency for the button layout including the AF button at the front right of this camera. I brought up the fact that I hate the button on the D800 to someone and they asked me where the switch is on the D700 and I stuttered and searched franticly on my body to show him. The button has become more of a reflex to me and I am getting used to it but nothing compared to the switch on the D700 in my opinion. Even though I still cant stand the location of this button on the D800 at least I will have a consistent workflow on the 2 cameras. Will I miss the extra points on the D600? Yes I will but fully converting to the new Nikon AF system is more important to me.

There are two big complaints about the camera that I have read on the internet. The first is that it only has 1/4000 shutter speed, the typical defense for Nikons shutter speed choice is “why do you need that?”. My simple response is obviously you don’t live in sunny San Diego and shoot large aperture primes. If you have never had 1/8000 shutter speed you are probably wondering why when you shoot at f1.4 during the day your images are consistently blown out. Sigh, this is a huge huge issue for me, good thing the camera would live its life mostly unused in a camera bag as a backup body but this is a near deal breaker for me.

David Hobby over at Strobist is pretty upset about another feature, the flash sync speed. Most Nikon cameras sync at 1/250th and even though thats only about a 1/3rd of a stop slower David feels quite strongly that its a big deal. Please visit the link if you are a speedlight or flash user but for me and a lot of other people a flash will only go on this camera if my arm is twisted.

Nikon still doesn’t have a professional APS-C camera replacement for the D300s since this camera even with the 24mp sensor is only 10mp with DX lenses. Those waiting for a replacement for either the D7000 or the D300s will have to continue waiting.

At this moment this camera as I stated earlier is the cheapest full-frame camera. By this I mean it is the cheapest camera at launch, Some people think that this is the answer to Canon still offering the 5D mk2 for just under $2,00 new. The price then continues to confuse people because the price difference in the UK is very close £150 difference from this and the D800. After the dust settles a bit Im sure the prices will flex to where they should be.

In the mean time dpreview has posted image samples here and a preview here. I would love to hear your opinion about this camera, leave some love to the comments and I will get to you!

 

Please Support The Phoblographer

We love to bring you guys the latest and greatest news and gear related stuff. However, we can’t keep doing that unless we have your continued support. If you would like to purchase any of the items mentioned, please do so by clicking our links first and then purchasing the items as we then get a small portion of the sale to help run the website.

Also, please follow us on FacebookFlickr and Twitter.

  • Aaron

    I think using a variable-stop neutral density filter might help the shutter speed issue. Just thought I’d make a suggestion you may not have considered.

    • Peter Walkowiak

      Thanks, that is a good point. I own one but I am quite anti-filter…

  • http://www.whitedoor.co.nz/ School Ball Photographer

    I am a big David Hobby fan – but have to disagree on the 1/200th sync speed. All the other features heavily out weigh this small sacrifice. I’m in!

    • Peter Walkowiak

      Yah im not a flash user, this is why I let him speak about the issue. I know I wouldn’t notice a difference.

  • http://twitter.com/simonpercivall Simon Percivall

    I’m thinking the ISO 100 as lowest normal sensitivity compared to ISO 200 for the D700 might compensate for the halved max shutter speed.

    • Peter Walkowiak

      I have shot at ISO 100 on my D800 and still needed the range above 1/4000. I know its not a big deal for me because it would live mainly as a second backup still cam or a second angle video camera.

      • David Pan

        Theoretically, ISO100 1/4000= ISO200 1/8000.

        • Eric L

          Yeah… I think we are all kind of spoiled now. Back in the old days, they used to use filters to compensate for lack of high shutter speed. Inconvenient? Sure… but hardly a deal breaker. Plus, the lower base ISO should help at least some.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Eric-Gruenberg/100002362393979 Eric Gruenberg

    Thanks for the write up – enjoyed it immensely. I’ve been eying the used D700 market recently, and now probably will think more in terms of the D600 (currently using a D7000 mostly). The D800 has been tempting, but those huge file sizes have scared me off.

    • Peter Walkowiak

      Nikon really does need a sRAW and mRAW option like Canon… I really wish my D800 had it. If you want to have a more familiar workflow I would go with the D600 because the layouts are more similar. It all depends on what you shoot, I mainly shoot landscape so the D800 is a blessing for me. If you shoot something that doesn’t require it skip the D800.

  • SOOLY

    Hello
    This review is so far the best comprehensive one. I am concerned about the shutter speed, the cross focus points and the focus points.
    I also prefer the feel of the big d700 body.

  • SOOLY

    Hello
    This is the best comprehensive review so far.
    I am still lost between the d600 and the d700. Am concerned about the few focus points, the free cross focus points, and the noise reduction in low light performance.
    D700 or d600? What would u chose?

    @sooly_kobayashi

    • gevon servo

      See my answer above

  • SOOLY

    Hello
    I have the following concerns:
    Focus points, cross focus points, noise reduction and low light performance.
    D600 or d700? I am confused about which one to buy. I prefer the d700 size and weight. And am not a film making fan hence am not tempted by the hd mov capabilities.
    What do u advise?
    @sooly_kobayashi

    • gevon servo

      I honestly recently bought the D700 body with grip for less the what the D600 body would cost. I could not be happier. I also had enough money left over to get a used 85mm 1.8D .

      I would say, though, if you could try them both before you buy, do so, then make your decision.

    • Peter Walkowiak

      I would agree with Gevon… honestly the camera feels great and I love the focus mode switch on the back, especially when paired with a grip. Pick up a used D700 for sure.

  • Bob

    very well written point of view…the D600 is still a tempting addition although I dont know if I could say goodbye to my D700.

    • gevon servo

      The D600 is a great camera, however I still think my D700 is mostly better. If they just added the new sensor and exspeed processor to the D700 and called it the D750 or D700 II I would of threw my money at them.

      • Peter Walkowiak

        Money throwing will only happen if I get a baby D4… I am thirsty for better high iso!

        • Renato Valenzuela

          i think the question now is if there’s any room for a baby D4. it’s clear the D800 isn’t the next D700 and the D600 is a full-frame D7000, which is absolutely fine. maybe there will be a D700x? who knows.

    • http://www.facebook.com/rfvalenz Renato F Valenzuela

      as a tool, the D700 still feels superior. but i think the D600 would be an awesome back-up.

    • Peter Walkowiak

      Thank you! I know the feeling… I just feel bad because my D700 sits in my bag unused most times. I am starting to not use it so much while shooting because the metering doesnt compare to my D800. Time will tell. I have such great travel memories with the camera.

  • brainsway

    1/200th Shutter sync. only? Or will it work with high speed shutter sync. as it does on my d300 with my sb 800 ?

    • ChrisGampat

      High Speed Sync is controlled by the flash. So natural sync is 1/200th.
      *-Chris Gampat*
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

  • http://www.pavelkounine.com/ Pavel Kounine

    Why does everyone keep referring to this camera as the cheapest digital dSLR ever? I know things move quickly in the digital blogging world, but they’re not so quick as to cause amnesia! Sony released a full frame dSLR called the A850 in August 2009 for an MSRP of $1,999. It was cheaper.

    • http://www.facebook.com/rfvalenz Renato F Valenzuela

      Nikon or Canon glass > Minolta glass. that’s why.

      • http://www.pavelkounine.com/ Pavel Kounine

        That’s a BS response and you very well know it. I think it’s just failure to do some basic research.

      • Peter Walkowiak

        I dont think that has anything to do with it… When sony was selling their A850 they were touting all of their impressive Zeiss glass. Honestly its some very impressive glass. I almost switched to Sony a couple of years back because of it.

    • gevon servo

      You probably do not want to read this however. From a business perspective, if you factor in inflation + world economic trends , the D600 is the cheapest.. Because of the worlds money issues 2009 money is different from 2012′s . The price of the Sony A850, if it came out today would probably be equal to or more than the D600

      • http://www.pavelkounine.com/ Pavel Kounine

        I’m well aware of inflation. And I’m still very much correct about the price. The A850 may have been released in 2009 for what is now equal to $2,147 or so, but it continued to sell for that MSRP of $1,999 up until it was discontinued in early 2011. $1,999 in 2011 is about $2,048 or so today. And that is why the Sony A850 is still the least expensive full-frame dSLR ever.

        • Eric L

          Ok… If you would like to get technical about it, the D600 is the least expensive full frame that is “currently” being sold on the market.

        • Peter Walkowiak

          Thanks for that. I am very aware of the A850 but I guess I forgot about its price. I thought the camera was cool back then but since that release Sony has changed from “another camera manufacturer” to one of the big contenders in the industry.

          Thank you for correcting me and pointing that out Pavel! I appreciate that.

  • d3ron
  • David Mayerhofer

    Nikon unfortunately created a Perfect Storm in its installed user base when this camera was announced. The unhappiness abounds from these fronts: A) D800 owners with serious buyers remorse B) Prosumers who were expecting FX for $1500 C) D700 owners who wanted a direct upgrade D) DX pros who are long overdue for a D400 replacement.

    I was hoping for a reasonably priced FX body, but Nikon has a huge group of D80/D90/D7000 owners who need a path to FX and this is it. Despite the unhappiness, the D600 will hit the sweet spot with these users and likely make it the best selling digital FX camera in history.

    • Peter Walkowiak

      Honestly I thought this was going to be cheaper also. Then again the D300 / D300s was like $1799 when it was first announced so I just assumed that this would replace the top of the line DX camera but there is still a demand for a D400. I am very curious how they price the next camera. Overall I agree with you… also with that damn auto / scene mode it makes things a bit more confusing.

  • Bryan Lowry

    I’m a D800 owner and no buyers remorse here. Had the D600 been released first I would own it but, the D800 came first and no regrets. Needed a new pc anyway and now 12gb’s of ram on an i7 chip handle those huge files with ease. I live in bright and sunny Hawaii so shooting over 4000 a sec is needed. Not a fan of filters either. Only use them minimally.
    Good review.

    • Peter Walkowiak

      Thanks a lot Bryan! I agree if this came out I may have bought it… I am glad I didn’t because i am too also very happy with my D800! :)

Previous post:

Next post: