Op-Ed: Why I Sold Everything for the Olympus OM-D E-M5

by Andy Hendriksen on 06/21/2012

I made a really big move this month, one that I’ve spent years thinking about. It was an overhaul, and was something that I’m not sure I could’ve done properly until this year. Yep, I sold my DSLR and all my lenses and moved to micro four thirds. And the one piece of gear that really pushed me there? You guessed it: the Olympus OM-D E-M5.

Rewind to late 2009, just after the announcement of the Panasonic GF1. Micro four thirds really excited me, and I was absolutely floored about the idea of carrying around a camera a fraction the size of my (then) Nikon D90, but one that is still capable of taking fantastic photos. As soon as the GF1 was available for purchase, I pulled out my credit card and had one in my hands.

I had loads of fun with that camera. It took stunning photos, and was small, light, and easy to carry around with me. I would bring it with me to places I never would’ve considered bringing a camera before, and never noticed the weight hanging around my neck. Yet, it wasn’t all joyous. Micro four thirds was young and there were still some glaring issues at that point. AF was terribly slow, low light performance wasn’t particularly good, and the lens ecosystem hadn’t quite matured at that point. Not to say that any of these issues were deal breakers, but for me, the GF1 wasn’t ready to be a DSLR replacement like I had hoped it would be.

I spent the next few years continuing to shoot with Nikon DSLRs, but was always cycling back and looking into mirrorless cameras to see if they had matured enough to really replace my DSLR. The Fuji X100 was about as close as I got, and I loved that camera. Stunningly good image quality, great in low light, and a really nice lens. But AF was still slow, and there were of course no interchangable lenses. The X100 was a great second camera, but wasn’t a DSLR replacement just yet.

Then 2012 came along, and there were two really big announcements that excited me and got me thinking again about the possibility of replacing my DSLR with something mirrorless, small, and light. First, the Fuji X-Pro 1. A Fuji X100, but with interchangable lenses? Just what I was looking for! But the price was prohibitive, the lens ecosystem isn’t there yet, and AF performance was still dismal. The one that really excited me was the Olympus OM-D E-M5.

A nod to the old Olympus OM SLRs, the OM-D E-M5 was dubbed as Olympus’s new flagship micro four thirds camera, and it looked great. Fancy new sensor, built-in EVF, “world’s fastest autofocus”, and the best low light performance we’ve seen out of a micro four thirds camera to date.

This was the one, I told myself. This was the camera that’s finally going to push me over the edge into mirrorless land. After doing some research and trying out some of the fantastic micro four thirds lenses available now, I made the decision that the OM-D E-M5 was going to replace my DSLR.

The Kit

DISCLAIMER: You see, I’m not a professional photographer. I’m a hobbyist that (very) occasionally gets paid to take photos. But I have a day job, and I primarily take photos because I love to do it. So when I talk about replacing my DSLR, understand that it is something that worked for me and my style of shooting, but it obviously isn’t perfect for everybody.

Now, back to the OM-D. On the surface, it seemed that I could put together a kit that was a fraction of the size and weight of my D7000 kit, but would be equally, if not more, flexible. It would encourage me to bring the camera with me more often and to places I wouldn’t normally want to lug around my D7000.

So I did it. It wasn’t an easy camera to find (and still isn’t), but I found a single silver OM-D in stock at my local camera store, and I grabbed it, along with a few lenses that I believe are some of the finest glass available for this system:

With these three lenses I have a system with a 24mm equivalent, a 50mm equivalent, and a 90mm equivalent, which is just about perfect for my style of photography. They’re all really amazing lenses, and you can read our review of the Olympus 45mm or the Olympus 12mm.

I started to put together my kit. I bought a new bag, and realized quickly that I could fit my OM-D, 3 lenses, and a backup body in a bag that would’ve previously only fit my DSLR and a single lens. For somebody that travels, the value of this cannot be stressed enough. It’s incredible to be able to carry an entire truly capable photography kit in a bag not much larger than a dictionary.

I also added in a few accessories like the Olympus HLD–6 battery grip for the OM-D. When adding on the first part of the grip, it makes the camera feel much more comfortable and substantial in the hand. This is my preferred configuration with the grip. When in need of some extra battery power or portrait shooting ergonomics, the second part of the battery grip can be attached. It’s a great piece of gear, and while not cheap, it makes the OM-D feel much more substantial as it can adapt it to situations that other micro four thirds cameras couldn’t do particularly well.

Lastly, none of my kits would be complete without a Yongnuo flash, and this one is no exception. I picked up a YN560 on Amazon for just under $100, and added in a couple of Cowboy Studio wireless triggers for good measure. I don’t use flash a whole lot, especially when a camera performs as well as the OM-D does in low light. That said, there are a few times when it’s needed, and the Yongnuo does the job just fine.

A bonus: I found a great deal on a barely used Olympus E-P1, and I decided to add it to my kit as a backup body. It’s a great little camera that is not without its flaws, but is still capable of taking some excellent photos and is a heck of a lot of fun to shoot around with.

The Results

Did I make the right choice? I’m overwhelmingly happy so far. The Olympus OM-D E-M5 is an incredibly fun camera to shoot with, and suits my shooting style perfectly. It feels right at home shooting with it on the street, and these great lenses continue to blow me away. It perfectly embodies what I loved so much about the Fuji X100, but incorporates the usability and flexiblity of my Nikon D7000. You can read our full review of the OM-D here, which includes more image samples and in-depth analysis of this great camera.

I really believe that the OM-D marks the point when the micro four thirds platform has matured, and has become the powerful, capable, and flexible system that we all hoped it would be at some point. Olympus has shown their belief and commitment to this platform by continuing to release excellent accessories and fantastic lenses, including the new 75mm f1.8 that I hope to review soon. Mirrorless has come a long way, and I’m awfully happy with where it’s at.

Please Support The Phoblographer

We love to bring you guys the latest and greatest news and gear related stuff. However, we can’t keep doing that unless we have your continued support. If you would like to purchase any of the items mentioned, please do so by clicking our links first and then purchasing the items as we then get a small portion of the sale to help run the website.

  • Wolfgang Lonien

    Amazing night photos, and congrats to your new kit. Good decision – I’d do the same in an instant if I could afford it right now.

  • jake

    me too sold my D7k for the NEX7 and now I am selling my NEX7 for the EM5 because I want to get the Oly 45f1.8 and the 12mm f2 like you did.
    I almost 100 percent agree with you on all points you made here, it is small ,fast and  very versatile and most importantly, it makes me go out with a camera more often than ever before..
    thanks for this  great  review.

    • GJK

      Wow, thanks for the comment, Jake. In my head, I still wanted the NEX-7 (but waiting for more lens selection). This article and your comment, they’re swaying me towards the Oly…

      • David Aymond

        I’m in the same situation as GJK, I really enjoy my DSLR but the size really matters when you want to get away for week end and travel light. For me, the EVF is mandatory on a camera and for the price of the OM-D, I was thinking that I should go for the NEX7… But now, the Olympus might be one !

        • David

          Great article. Still torn btw the NEX-7 and the OM-D. They both look to be great cameras.

        • sean lancaster

          The f/1.8 lenses on the NEX system are a stop better/faster than the Oly m43 lenses. Not to mention the NEX having better dynamic range. Image quality is just better on the NEX even though it’s going to be very good on the EM5. I suspect we’re to a point where most people are going to be happy with whatever option they choose. I am going the other direction. The m43 sensor is too small for me and I am looking at full frame cameras (e.g., the RX1) to give me the shallow DOF that I desire.

          • ChrisGampat

            Olympus has the 45mm f1.8, 75mm f1.8 and 17mm f1.8.

            Overall agreed with you but I absolutely need to say this as I always do: how much dynamic range do you really need? If you’re over two stops off, you need to do yourself a favor and learn to meter.

            *-Chris Gampat*
            Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
            Twitter.com/Phoblographer
            Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

          • Bhupinder2002

            None of NEX camera has better DR than OMD ,please verify your facts before you make a claim

          • Bhupinder2002

            Oh… sensor on OMD is too small ? How small ? Slightly larger than rice grain ? This is utter nonsense , None of NEx is better than OMD and Sony WB sucks , skin tones are horrible .The DOF you get with Oly 45 , PL 25 and Oly 75 1.8 is what you need. Have you actually used OMD and Prime lenses ? Please visit http://www.mu-43.co m to see what OMD can do.
            Cheers

            • sean lancaster

              I ended up with a Canon 6D. Skin tones are great as is WB, but I shoot RAW anyway. I have a 50/1.2L lens. You can’t come close to approaching the low light shooting I can with this combo. That’s what I meant by “sensor too small” fwiw.

  • Nicholas Decker

    Thanks fantastic review with anecdotal evidence of great practical forms for the olympus. Was looking at a Nikon dslr but thought it was truly bulky and this has swayed me into the Olympus more :)

  • Dguidas

    Thanks for your insight on the E-M5. I have a Panasonic GX1 that I bought mainly as a travel camera. After seeing the results of the first trip with my GX1 I decided that I don’t need to lug around a dslr any more. The image quality of the GX1 is great, of course, but I do miss some of the handling characteristics of my Pentax. I think the E-M5 will fill in that gap nicely. And, as you noted, you cannot discount the great lenses available. Something I think many overlook when thinking about a camera purchase.

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/fabrys/ Fabrys

    I absolutely agree with you, and I think I will only keep my M43 cameras (OMD + GX1) for stills, maybe just my 7D for video in 24p…

    My last set with the OMD :

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/fabrys/sets/72157629996469356/

    & my last video with the OMD in Barcelona :

    vimeo.com/44175963

  • schmiddi

    so in the end with all the add ons  you have a camera with more or less the same size as before. but it looks a bit more retro. is that it? don’t really get it. 

    plus, this is a blog ,so why call it op-ed, everything here is an opinion piece. 

    • Andy Hendriksen

      I’m not sure I understand your point. How is it the same size as before? Even with the entire battery grip attached, it’s significantly smaller than my D7000 with a lens. 

      I also pointed out that I can have a small bag that would fit 3 lenses and 2 bodies, where previously it would’ve barely fit a single lens and body. 

      I didn’t mention the retro styling in this post at all, as it isn’t really something I care about… 

  • http://giuliosciorio.com Giulio Sciorio

    Good move Andy. I too sold my Canon system a few months ago for Micro 4/3rds but I was shooting with the Pen Mini at the time. I’ve been shooting professionally for over 7 years and have been shooting with the Mini and now the E-M5 on assignments. Mostly magazine covers but some editorial portraits as well. The whole system has transformed the way I shoot and I have been documenting my experiences on my blog.

    Shooting wirelessly to the iPad on jobs is great for clients too. They love being able to wander around while getting the images wirelessly and making their picks as the shoot progresses.

    Most important thing is that I love the files and my clients do too but the cost of ownership is far less expensive then what I had in my Canon system and that money goes to my bottom line.

    Mirrorless cameras are the future and the E-M5 is leading the way.

    • Bhupinder

      Yes Giulio I fully agree with you and future belongs to mirror less cameras .The big camera manufacturers are stuck with the mirror just because of their own reasons rather than any logical ones.For those who have any doubts about MFT , please visit http://www.mu-43.com to see whats happening .
      Cheers

      • http://giuliosciorio.com Giulio Sciorio

        Well said!

  • CGW

    Close but no cigar, Olympus. The retro design(the OM series is older than most OM-D buyers) compromises function–like the way your nose smudges up the LCD? Don’t get the shutter release position–guess that’s why you bought the grip, right?  It’s still a m4/3.

    Though DSLR obits are premature, APS-C and FF MILCs are poised to force a near-total rethink in camera design. Sony gets it. Nikon and Canon don’t. Not sure Oly does–yet. For sure, though, we’re all tired of pumped-up DSLRs when mirrorless delivers so much for little weight. Thanks for a non-press release style review. It’s one of this site’s strengths.

    • photohounds

      I got the grip for extra (and easily swappable) battery – even on the run.
      I also like it’s near total camera control in portrait mode.
      It comes odd to give something very compact and of high quality.

      Too often, I left the DSLR at home (or in the car) – hardly happens now.
      Someone said “the best camera is the one you have with you.”
      That was often the phone, but not these days … screen is easily wiped so no drama there.

      So A cigar is deserved as EM-5 has most things spot-on.  Not saying it can never be improved.  I’m sure it will.
      First there will be a non weather-resistant cheaper version and then they’ll have to scratch their heads to make this tool even better?

      Haven’t decided to get rid of my BIG stuff … yet.

    • http://www.facebook.com/trond.holst Trond Kjetil Holst

      >> The retro design(the OM series is older than most OM-D buyers) compromises function–like the way your nose smudges up the LCD?
      This isn’t a problem with the OM-D unless you have a very small face. It was a problem with the EOS 5D MkII I had before, but with the OM-D my nose does not touch the LCD at all.

  • enosone

    This was a great piece, I appreciate the honesty in your disclaimer (specifically: ”
    So when I talk about replacing my DSLR, understand that it is something that worked for me and my style of shooting, but it obviously isn’t perfect for everybody.”) . 
    I was curious if the Speedlight you mentioned works on the E-P1 as well as the OM-D. I’ve been shooting with an E-PL1 and was looking for an alternative to Olympus’s flash options. 

    • http://twitter.com/ronnbot ronbot

      You can also try Metz; I have the AF-1 50 and it is fully compatible with TTL on m4/3. That flash also has RC mode (like the Oly flash guns) so it can be wireless controlled by an Oly body (via it’s flash). 

  • http://twitter.com/oldsweng Patrick Magee

    I’ve sold off my Canon 5DMkII kit and gone OMD and GH2. I got tired, and sore, lugging around three bags of gear. I now have one over-the-shoulder bag containing the two bodies and an assortment of lenses.  The image quality of the OMD has not disappointed me and I’m shooting more because I just grab a bag and go.

    • steph

      Good to hear, i so want to buy a 5d but too dear, and i’ve worked as a photo retoucher for 6 years so i know they take top quailty digital photos.

  • http://twitter.com/intensitystudio Antonio Carrasco

     This is a good article and I am excited about the OM-D camera.

    But why put a battery grip on it? Doesn’t that just ruin the whole reason for buying the smaller camera?

    • Andy Hendriksen

      The battery grip certainly isn’t for all situations, but I find I leave the first half of the grip on almost all the time. It doesn’t add much of anything to the size or the weight, but improves handling quite a bit. 

      Even with the entire grip attached though, it’s still smaller and lighter than my old DSLR.

      • Tobias Weisserth

        It’s certainly easier to grab the camera this way, but the fact that the grip needs to be removed to change the internal battery is a bit cumbersome. I am still arguing with myself whether to get the grip, currently my inner self is 60% against getting it and only 40% in favor of it. The price is pretty steep for a minor benefit. For example, as it adds so much size to the camera, why didn’t they manage to squeeze two batteries into the grip? Then, id’d be a no-brainer.

    • http://giuliosciorio.com Giulio Sciorio

      The HLD-6 does add size to the camera but I do like it when I have assignments where I need to shoot wirelessly to my iPad. Shooting wirelessly drains the batteries much faster and the extra power helps keep the shoot going smooth. If I’m shooting for myself I’ll use the half grip or no grip at all OR just shoot with my Pen Mini.

    • jan

      street cred

  • Jollyaard

    I’ve been a 4/3 user for a while with cameras from the Olympus D-500 to the E-5, and had dabbled with the PEN EP-2. I was never happy with the m4/3 pen due to the low light performance and slow focus, but I couldn’t get rid of it after I’d got some c-mount lenses, and a tilt-shift adapter for OM lenses. When the OMD was announced, it seemed to solve the pen’s problems. After getting hold of one, and seeing how it out performs my E-5 at low light, I never take my DSLR anywhere anymore. As a concert photographer, low light no flash photos are the most important, and to my amazement, the OMD gives usable shots at iso 12,800. To have that in a small, lightweight, and water/beer proof package means a DSLR is unnecessary. I plan to get the battery grip too, as it’ll improve the handling, and still be small and light. Other photographers have been sceptical seeing my kit, but end up being tempted themselves when they see the results!

  • Brandonhenderson1

    Wondering what your kit cost you total. I like the idea as a travel and family camera. I would keep my nikon gear for working, but the idea of a light weight camera for everyday use appeals to me.

  • http://www.alexcoghe.com/ Alex Coghe

    Almost three years ago  I said goodbye to DSLR. Then I became a pro. I still think that DSLR are the best solution for some kinds of Photography, but when comes Street and Documentary  Photography, m4/3 and also some high end p&s are perfect. I know that you have made a good choice. Suerte.

  • Ich Will

    Did I make the right choice?
    Yes, because of your next statement:

    I’m overwhelmingly happy so far.
    :)

  • Shudbesailing

    I have had my silver E-M5 for two months. Preordered in Feb.
    I found that we were always taking the canon S-95 with us and leaving the 50-D and big lenses behind. The Oly has changed that. I am very pleased with my choice. I, too have the 12mm and 25 f1.4. Think I will forgo the 45 in favor off sealed 60mm macro for sailing hobby. A long zoom with f4 would be nice. Size could stay small, and the fast sensor can do the rest.

    • Ebosch

       ”a long zoom with f4 would be nice”
      are you aware of the upcoming panasonic 35-100mm f2.8?

      • Shudbesailing

        I am aware of that lens. Thanks. I was thinking of MFT 100-300

  • Calcity3

    I just made the same move selling off my D700, 24mm f/1.4G, 85mm f/1.4D, and 300mm f/4 AFS.  Loved the results from my DSLR setup, but the weight was just ridiculous to carry around.  Still waiting on my Oly OM-D body, grip, lenses, and other bits as they trickle in through the mail.  Can’t wait to get that 75mm f/1.8.  Should be a killer lens.  Best of all, the entire kit can be carried around all day with no back pain!!!

  • photohounds

    I had no doubts I did the right thing, and you’ve just confirmed it (again)  - as has this bloke:
    http://www.smallcamerabigpicture.com/how-to-overcome-fears-using-micro-43rds-cameras-in-a-professional-environment/

    You DO take these things nearly everywhere.  When the grip makes it “too big”. OFF it comes fits in a coat pocket with the 14-43 ii lens as well..
    Bro in law has a recent Panny and he’s happy with it, too.  Differnt needs as he flogs his cameras a bit less but has more lenses.
    Those two new 1.8 lenses oooh la la! Neither of us has a pancake yet, and all his panny lenses focus perfectly on the EM-5.

    I’ll never look (or go) back – unless I need to shoot a billboard in one shot..

  • Michael Van den Bergh

    What is described in this article is pretty pointless. In the end combining the OM-D + 3 prime lenses, you paid $2766 for a kit that does the equivalent of a 24-85 f/4 zoom on a full frame camera, or the equivalent of a 16-50 f/2.8 zoom on an APS-C camera, except that you have to swap lenses and have lower image resolution. The images posted don’t look impressive at all. A Nikon D5100 paired with the excellent Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 will set you back $900 and do the same, if not better than the proposed Olympus kit. And riddle me this: it will weigh the same 900 grams as the Olympus kit. M43 needs to get significantly cheaper (at least 75% cheaper) in order for it to make sense.

    • Andy Hendriksen

       Can’t say I agree with you. I’d take fast prime lenses over a slow zoom any day. The fastest zoom you’re going to find is f/2.8, and that’s simply just not fast enough for many situations. Your argument for a 24-85 f/4 only solidifies my point–it’s just not fast enough. Three stops faster makes a world of difference when shooting concerts, night street shots, indoor weddings, etc.

      So, price out a kit for me that includes an f/2 wide angle, an f/1.4 standard, and an f/1.8 mid telephoto/portrait lens and then we’ll see where the numbers fall. And believe me–I carried 4 fast primes with my D7000 and it was significantly heavier than my entire m4/3 kit.

      Not to mention size/weight of the camera itself, stealth factor when shooting on the street, adaptability of lenses from other systems, and so much more. Sometimes decisions like this are about more than just the numbers.

      • http://www.facebook.com/sjekster Marcel Samson

        But that 2.8 disadvantage is easily overcome by pushing the ISO by 1 stop on you APS-C cam. Noise perfomance on a typical APS-C camera is still better than on M4/3 cams, even though the difference is getting smaller. But you are right, there’s more to it than numbers.

        I myself have a m4/3 cam with a 20mm 1.7 lens glued to it, and love it as a small camera for situations I don’t want to carry the big stuff. Although ergonomically I still prefer my 7d. M4/3 only works with small lenses if you ask me. Oly / Panny get that, sort of, Sony completely misses the point with their NEX series…
        I have the 20mm 1.7 lens, and am considering buying a 45mm 1.8, but lenses any bigger than that will spoil the fun for me. Especially on cams without EVF. The OM-D seems awesome, but I myself would want to use it without that bulky grip, which also seems really unpleasant to hold…

      • Michael Van den Bergh

        You really don’t get it. I’m am telling you that what you call ‘fast primes’ on m43, behave identical to slow zooms on DX and FX cameras. That 12mm f/2 behaves identical to a 24mm f/4 on a full frame camera. Is that impressive? I don’t think so. It may look fast (f/2) but it will get you the DoF of an f/4 lens and running a m43 sensor at ISO 200 is the equivalent of using a full frame sensor at ISO 800. So in the end, it makes little difference wether you are using that ‘fast prime’ or ‘slow zoom’. Sure, the size advantage is very interesting, as is the built-in stabilization. But don’t give me that ‘fast prime’ vs. ‘slow zoom’ nonsense because these m43 primes are not fast at all. f/4 equivalent is really not fast. And the shots above look bad. Those baku cave shots look bad. Sharpness is not the only important factor in photography. I need to see better shots to be convinced, and it seems that it is impossible to make cheap & fast glass for m43. f/2 is not fast on this size of sensor and at that focal length. And still the lenses are incredibly expensive, and the results don’t look great. At it’s not lighter!!!

    • Bhupinder

      Michael I think u are living in ancient era my friend . Olympus OMD kicks butt of every APS-C sized camera out there in the market in low light and DR and what else u need? Nikon D5100 doesn’t come anywhere near it .

    • Steve Jones

      Michael the OM-D is selling like hot cakes to pros and amateurs around the world because it hits all the bases, capable, small, weatherproofed,fast lenses. People don’t buy products if it isn’t what they want. I’m a travel photographer. A Nikon D camera with Tamron lens will not be as compact or convenient for me and I need lightweight. The OMD lens images i have seen are excellent quality. Google search Robin Wong batu caves (and look at his macro images too taken with nothing more than the kit lens!) and THEN tell me the OMD system is lacking quality. Really?
      The Nikon by the way is larger, so are the lenses,can’t be programmed or set up with as much versatility, doesn’t have weather sealing or 5-axis stabilizing or…the list goes on. No the Nikon doesn’t do the same.

    • arentol

      24-85 f/4? Where does that even come from? 12mm f/2, 25 f/1.4, and 45 f/1.8… All those are more than twice as fast as a 24-85 f/4. Oh, I get it, you are making your comparison based on the LEAST relevant factor, Depth of Field… And then you are failing entirely at that because you picked the slowest aperture to double and conveniently ignored the fact that your 24-85 f/4 lens wouldn’t come even close to matching the 25 f/1.4 in DOF. Sorry, but this is a complete fail of an argument. Especially since the light gathering ability of these lenses is far more important than their depth of field, and you would need a 24-90 f/1.4 lens, which would be massive AND have worse IQ, or 3 primes, to match their light gathering ability…. And either way the size and weight difference would be gigantic. Even if I cut you some slack and split the difference between DOF vs Aperture, lets say a 24-90 f/2.5, that would still be a very big lens and would have to have some significant IQ compromises to make it work.

  • Pingback: Il futuro delle reflex | Winged

  • Pingback: Is The Olympus OM-D E-M5 a Game Changer? - Micro Four Thirds User Forum

  • Renato Valenzuela

    but… the bokeh.  any MFT lens with a faster than f/2.8 aperture is going to cause an exorbitant amount of money.  i considered an OM-D, wound up with a D700 instead. completely satisfied.

    • http://www.andyhendriksen.com/ Andy Hendriksen

      The Panasonic 20mm f/1.7 can be had for only $359 or so, and the Olympus 45mm f/1.8 is only $399. Not sure what you’re referring to.

      • Aaron Fown

        And I cannot stress enough how utterly fantastic the Panny 20mm is. It is my standard prime, and virtually never leaves my camera. I find it is tack sharp across the field from 2.0 on and has a great characteristic quality to its images. OK, focus is kind of slow, but that is the only major flaw. For the price, it’s a great deal.

  • Zack Jones

    I did the same, sold all of my Canon DSLR gear in favor of the OM-D E-M5 kit. For the type of photography I’m doing now I couldn’t be more pleased with the swap. Sure there are some things a DSLR can do better then the E-M5 but overall I don’t regret it one bit.

  • Boid

    I think the overall image quality on the OM5 isn’t a patch on the Fujis. If image quality matters more to you than the AF, just go for the Fuji Xs. The APSC sensor wins out against the micro 4/3 on the OMD every time.

  • Mickey

    I have been a 35mm buff since the early ’70′s. I have several of the old Minolta SRT bodies and nearly the entire Rokkor-series MF lenses but my digital experience is limited to a Canon P&S. I have been anxious to find a digital format that is also adaptable to my MF lenses. Apparently, the DSLR format cannot be adapted, the Micro 4/3 seems promising, but the APS-C promises greater resolution. I would appreciate any suggestions from experienced users.

  • Pingback: "Everything" For The OM-D E-M5... - Micro Four Thirds User Forum

  • AunKoh

    Fantastic post. I’m currently saving up for the OM-D. Use a GF1 and my wife uses an EP-2. Like you, I also sold off all of my SLR and DSLR gear. Micro 4/3 is just such a great system. Ive listed my own gear here: http://chubbyhubby.net/gadgets-gear/

  • Chris Mitchell

    Good write up, I’ve just sold my EP2 setup to buy a Fuji X-Pro 1 and while I love the 35mm f1.4 lens I do wonder if I’d be happier with an OMD (mainly due to the lenses) Your lineup of 12mm, 25mm and 45mm would be perfect for me!

    • shiftyz

      I loved the x pro 1 iq but the auto focus is just painful at times. If you can deal with it and the lens cover your range, the images really can’t be beat even by DSLR’s

  • Dee

    Very simple article which I believe any µ4/3 user will love it including me. I just started few months back with µ4/3 system (Oly E-PL2, Panasonic 14mm and 20mm). At one point I was thinking of selling my D7000 and just go for the OM-D, but I realize I need my Nikon as a backup body for work. I have to agree with some other comments regarding picture quality of µ4/3 vs crop sensor camera, but seriously… any DSLR user should try the µ4/3 system. It may not beat DSLR in certain area such as AF speed, low light, etc… (especially for my setup…hehehe) but I’m enjoying photography like never before. I love how light I can travel now and at the same time now I’m practicing my street and travel photography without worrying that I capture people attention with my bulky DSLR.

  • http://www.facebook.com/FrederickNews Craig Shipp

    The micro four thirds has too small a sensor for my liking.

  • Vittore Buzzi

    I’m a professional photographer and I start to work with Olympus last year, with the E-P3… Right now I’m working with OM-D and sometimes with my D700.
    I really wan’t say a word about quality, please check my web sites:
    http://www.wedding-photographer.it/

    and
    http://photographer.photoshelter.com/

    Light cameras nice lenses. that’s what I was looking for.

  • panzerfaustnl

    Nice, but I would not sell any of my 40 camera’s for it.

  • Edwin Crescini

    Thanks for the great article! I myself also jump into the bandwagon and never look back. I still used my 60D and T2i for video work but the E-M5 for photos. The portability and small size is a biggie for me and the quality of the pictures are outstanding! WOW factor is back without breaking my back :)

    You can check out my pictures at http://www.500px.com/jalaed

    I love doing macro and the IBIS works surprisingly well!

  • Pingback: Op-Ed: Why I Sold Everything for the Olympus OM-D E-M5 › pentax rumors

  • OMPEN

    I sold all of my Olympus 4/3 DSLR cameras just for this. Now I carry this camera everyday and I still have PEN as 2nd camera. I’m happy that you have find peace. Enjoy shooting with your new great OM-D.

  • Joe

    Your story almost perfectly mirrors mine. I just sold my D7000 and all my Nikon glass, after a week of shooting with the E-M5. I couldn’t be more happy. Comparable image quality and performance at half the size and weight – what’s not to like? Sure, if you like to go around with a D700 and 50mm f1.2 shooting wide open all the time, m4/3 is not for you. Same is true if you like to shoot birds in flight – at least until Olympus puts phase detection sensors on the image sensor – or print larger than 13″x19″. For most people though, even many professionals, the E-M5 is more than enough camera. You’d have to be pretty clueless, or just a silly full frame snob to deny that at this point. That’s coming from someone who once swore he’d never buy into the m4/3 system.

  • popeyoni

    I too sold all my Nikon equipment last week. After I tried the OM-D there really was no point in keeping the bigger and heavier camera and lenses to get identical results.

  • Pingback: Why MicroFourThirdsPhotographer.com? | Micro Four Thirds Photographer

  • AA

    I also sold most of my Canon DSLR gears and bought an E-M5 using the fund raised without spending a penny. I must say this camera makes me ENJOY taking travel, casual and family photos without breaking my back.

    Remember years ago I went up Chengdu Ermeishan with 1 DSLR body, 2 lenses, a flash and a sturdy tripod, they were killing me. I had the same back breaking experience when trekking up and down Hallasan on Jeju Island a couple of years ago with the same gears. Apart from the enjoyment of going through the stunning photos after the
    trips, I didn’t enjoy carrying all those gears travelling around.

    Now I want to travel and trek again with my E-M5! Looking forward to my next trip. :)

  • Jason

    I recently got rid of my canon kit so I could get the nex 7, it is a great wee camera with fantastic iq but on a recent trip os I met a guy with the omd, we swapped cameras for the day and after a full day of snaps I knew I had to get one so the next day I went out and picked one up and I couldn’t be more happy with it now I just need to sell my nex 7 so I cam afford some decent primes

  • steph

    This might be a silly question but i have an OM 2 and an OM10 film camera and a few 50mm lenses. Do you know if these lenses fit on the OMD? i heard a rumour that they do but cannot find any info about it.
    Nice article i like that you point out this is a good hobbyist street photo camera as it fits the size and style of the original street cameras like the leica and old OM’s.

    • ChrisGampat

      With an adapter, you can put the old OM lenses onto your OMD.

      *-Chris Gampat*
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

  • Edwin Canlapan

    I’m actually considering selling my Canon Rebel camera for this one.

  • Pingback: Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 « Promit's Ventspace

  • nik

    this was such a great read thanks , I’m looking to sell my 550d and 17-40l lens for this same setup , starting with the panasonic glass first then the 12mm.

  • Jay

    Great review – really interesting food for though! Similar path to me, I bought the (lovely) X100 but sold it due to AF latency issues. Bought the XPro1, and disappointed to find AF still a weakness for Fuji. My review here. http://zeofoto.wordpress.com/2012/07/28/fujifilm-xpro1-did-they-release-a-beta/ Seems this Olympus is the one I need to check out – so thanks for this post.

  • Pingback: Fujifilm XPro1 – did they release a Beta? « A random Weblog

  • Pingback: First Impressions: Nikon 1 V2 (and a Quick Glimpse of the Nikon 70-200mm f4 G … | DSLRcam.info

  • http://www.facebook.com/david.wolanski David Wolanski

    I’ve been thinking about selling my 5DMK II after lugging it and some lenses through the airport. I like shooting portraits, and boudoir,and a little studio. I like shooting the boudoir in natural light so I’m in the 1600 ISO range and wide open.
    I keep seeing “except for some special cases, I don’t need a full frame”
    What are the special cases?
    I’m not a big fan of wide landscapes and it seems like 16mp will be plenty. So, any advice would be appreciated…

  • Susan

    Hi. I now own an Oly OMD and have had it a little less than a month. I also own a Nikon D7000 with several lenses, including a wonderful (but heavy) 105mm macro lens. I am terrified to sell my Nikon system for the OMD. I’ve invested a lot of money in lenses. At the same time, I hate carrying the weight. And most of the time when I’m hiking, I wind up just taking the kit lens and a wide angle due to the weight. So I don’t take any of my fancy lenses (telephoto, 70-200mm) anyway. I’m impressed with the images I get from the Oly, but making the jump seems awfully scary. Advice?

    • AA

      Actually you’ll start to loathe carrying the DSLR + lenses and big tripod after using OM-D for a while. Then you’ll realise that you haven’t used the D7000 for months. But by that time, the body would be worth next to nothing.
      I, on the contrary, sold my Canon DSLR + lenses before buying the OM-D. Not an easy decision as I started using Canon SLR before changing to digital some 10 years back.
      Apart from getting all the gear all over again and the steep learning curve, I have no regret at all. Now I regain the joy of photography, be that casual or serious. And I don’t need to leave any important lenses or even tripod behind when I go trekking and travelling. I will bring it along my next kayaking trip.

  • Ghost

    I shoot with a D90 and D600. Although I’m still more comfortable with the Nikons, the more I use the OM-D the closer I am to selling all my Nikon gear. I use the Panasonic 25mm ƒ1.4, Olympus 12-50 kit lens, and Olympus 45 ƒ1.8. The entire kit is very light and MUCH easier to carry. The OM-D is not perfect yet and has a few concerns – but it’s definitely a big step in the right direction.

    I’ve tried older micro 4/3rds (like the GF3 and GH2) and was not impressed. The OM-D EM-5 is significantly better than previous micro 4/3rds.

    BTW – for critics who say the ƒ1.8 is equivalent to FX ƒ4 – only the DOF is equivalent. The ƒ1.8 still has the light gathering of ƒ1.8. I usually shoot portraits with an 85mm 1.4D on DX and FX at ƒ2.8 or slower because I want more than one eyelash in focus. So for most people, using the Olympus 45mm at ƒ1.8 gives you the light gathering of ƒ1.8 while putting more of the person in focus. This is better for most people (unless you want only one eyelash in focus, in which case, you need to shoot FX).

  • ben

    Hi Andy:

    Great article! I too have done away with my Nikon SLR and gone fully m4/3. Hey I’m in search of a bag that can fit OMD with the full battery grip attached. The Cosmos bag look nice and not so bulky, will that accomodate the OMD+fullgrip? Thanks.

    Ben

  • Alan

    I did the same thing: I sold my Nikon DSLR and lenses and accessories and bought the OMD EM-5, battery grip and a couple of lenses. I am so happy with my decision!

  • http://www.facebook.com/jungho Jungho Kim

    I virtually have the same kit as you… except I have the e-p3 as a backup. Having a great time shooting with both!

  • sean sullivan

    Done ! i have done the same , i just ordered my OM-D and should receive it in the next few days .
    I put my canon 50D with 17-85 mm lense and flash and 100-400 canon IS lense all on ebay today and someone bought it in 30 seconds .
    I am excited about the new venture as i have always had SLR for over 20 years , its a big move and not one i made in a hurry , i researched the om-d for maybe 6 weeks and decided it was the way to go .
    Hopefully i have made the write move ? i am sure i have as the reviews of the OM-D are amazing .

  • Pingback: Op-Ed: Why I Sold Everything for the Olympus OM-D E-M5 » Richard Ella Photography

  • http://twitter.com/Lainer Lainer

    Olympus is intriguing, but the Fuji X-E1 is also.

  • Pingback: Il futuro delle reflex | Winged | Photography, theatre and other geeky stuff by Ciro Mattia Gonano

  • Charisse

    This is a great review. I am torn between getting the Fujifil X100 S or the Olympus-OM-D. I think you got me sold into getting the Olymus! Great blog!

  • Miguel Ruiz

    Great article, just what I needed to convince myself, just a quick question im in the mrket for a new camera and I really think this is it, great picture quality, weather resistant and light, plus the price is great, my only concern at the moment is that this camera is almost a year old, is there a posibility a new one is coming soon? I know this will more than match my needs but… just in case.

  • DSLR 4evah

    My OM-D just arrived this afternoon. After working with it for a few hours, I put it up for sale on Craigslist. This thing is a toy. I can’t take it seriously. Images are noisy even at base ISO. Bleh….

    • ChrisGampat

      You have a far different experience than Andy and I have.

      *Chris Gampat*
      Chris Gampat Photography

Previous post:

Next post: