Long Term Comparison Review: Fujifilm X Pro 1 vs Sony NEX 7 vs Olympus OMD EM5

by Chris Gampat on 07/11/2012

 

After an exhaustive amount of time, we’ve finished reviewing the Olympus OMD EM5, Sony NEX 7 and Fujifilm X Pro 1. Each camera has their own strengths and weaknesses and represents the pinnacle of what each company has tried to achieve so far in the mirrorless camera market. With all of them being targeted at the high end enthusiast/semi-professional, they all bring a unique set of features to the table that makes them all appealing to various types of shooters. But in the end, only one can actually be called the current king of the crop.

This post is a result of the findings of various exhaustive tests, the least amount of pixel-peeping possible, and based on how someone may actually use the cameras.

Now, let’s dive right in.

 

Tech Specs

X Pro 1

Specs borrowed from the B&H Photo Video listing

Imaging
Camera Format APS-C (1.5x Crop Factor)
Resolution Effective Pixels: 16.3 Megapixels
Sensor Type / Size CMOS, 23.6 x 15.6 mm
File Formats Still Images: JPEG, RAW
Movies: MPEG-4 AVC/H.264
Memory Card Type SD
SDHC
SDXC
AV Recording
Video Recording Yes
Audio Recording With Video, Stereo
Focus Control
Focus Type Auto
Focus Mode Single-servo AF (S), Continuous-servo AF (C) 1
Autofocus Points 49
Viewfinder/Display
Viewfinder Type Optical, Electronic
Display Screen 3.0″ Rear Screen   LCD (1230000)
Screen Coverage 100%
Exposure Control
ISO Sensitivity 200-6400 (Extended Mode: 100-25600)
Shutter Type: Mechanical
Speed: 30 – 1/4000 sec
Metering Method Spot metering, Average metering, Multi-zone metering 2
Exposure Modes Modes: Aperture Priority, Manual, Program, Shutter Priority
Compensation: -2 EV to +2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
White Balance Modes Auto, Fluorescent (Day White), Fluorescent (Natural White), Fluorescent (White), Incandescent, Kelvin, Underwater 3
Flash
Continuous Shooting Up to 6 fps
Dedicated Flash System iTTL
External Flash Connection Hot Shoe
Performance
Self Timer 10 sec, 2 sec
Connectivity HDMI C (Mini), USB 2.0
Power
Battery 1x Built-in Rechargeable Lithium-ion Battery
Operating/Storage Temperature 32 to 104 °F (0 to 40 °C)
Humidity: 10 – 80%
Physical
Dimensions (WxHxD) 5.5 x 3.2 x 1.7″ / 139.70 x 81.28 x 43.18 mm
Weight 15.9 oz / 451 g

Sony NEX 7

Taken from B&H Photo’s listing of the lens

Imaging
Lens Mount Sony E Mount
Camera Format APS-C (1.5x Crop Factor)
Resolution Effective Pixels: 24.3 Megapixels
Max Resolution: 24 MP: 6000 x 4000
Sensor Type / Size CMOS, 23.5 x 15.6 mm
File Formats Still Images: JPEG, RAW
Movies: MPEG-4 AVC/H.264
Audio: AAC
Dust Reduction System Y
Noise Reduction Yes
Memory Card Type Memory Stick PRO HG-Duo
Memory Stick Pro Duo
SD
SDHC
SDXC
AV Recording
Video Recording Yes, NTSC
Aspect Ratio 4:3, 16:9
Audio Recording With Video, Stereo
Focus Control
Focus Type Auto & Manual
Focus Mode Single-servo AF (S), Continuous-servo AF (C), Manual Focus (M)
Autofocus Points 25
Viewfinder/Display
Viewfinder Type Electronic
Viewfinder Coverage 100%
Viewfinder Magnification Approx. 1.09x
Diopter Adjustment - 4.0 to +1.0 m
Display Screen 3″ Rear Screen Tilting  LCD (921600)
Screen Coverage 100%
Live View Yes
Exposure Control
ISO Sensitivity 100-16000
Shutter Type: Electronic
Speed: 30 – 1/4000 sec
Metering Method Spot metering, Center-weighted average metering, Multi-zone metering
Exposure Modes Modes: Aperture Priority, Auto, Manual, Program, Shutter Priority
Compensation: -5 EV to +5 EV (in 0.33 EV steps)
White Balance Modes Auto, Cloudy, Daylight, Flash, Fluorescent, Incandescent, Kelvin, Manual, Shade
Flash
Continuous Shooting Up to 10 fps
External Flash Connection Proprietary
Performance
Self Timer 2 sec, 10 sec
Connectivity AV Output, HDMI C (Mini), USB 2.0
Wi-Fi Capable (With Optional Transmitter) Yes
Software Requirements Windows: XP (SP3), Vista (SP2), 7
Mac: OS X 10.3 or later
Power
Battery 1x NP-FW50  Rechargeable Lithium-Ion Battery Pack
Physical
Dimensions (WxHxD) 4.72 x 2.63 x 1.69″ / 11.99 x 6.69 x 4.28 cm
Weight 10.3 oz / 292 g Camera body only

Olympus OMD EM5

Specs taken from the B&H Photo listing of the camera

Imaging
Lens Mount Micro Four Thirds
Camera Format Micro Four Thirds (2x Crop Factor)
Resolution Effective Pixels: 16.1 Megapixels
File Formats Still Images: JPEG, RAW
Movies: AVI, MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV
Bit Depth 12-bit
Dust Reduction System Y
Noise Reduction Yes
Memory Card Type SD
SDXC 1
Image Stabilization Mechanical
AV Recording
Video Recording Yes
Aspect Ratio 4:3, 16:9
Audio Recording With Video, Stereo, Via Optional External Mic 2
Focus Control
Focus Type Auto & Manual
Focus Mode Single-servo AF (S), Continuous-servo AF (C), Manual Focus (M)
Autofocus Points 35
Viewfinder/Display
Viewfinder Type Electronic
Viewfinder Coverage 100%
Viewfinder Magnification Approx. 1.0x
Diopter Adjustment - 4 to +2 m
Display Screen 3.0″ Rear Touchscreen Tilting  LCD (610)
Screen Coverage 100%
Exposure Control
ISO Sensitivity Auto, 200-25600 3
Shutter 1/4000 – 60 seconds
Remote Control RM-UC1 (Optional)
Metering Method Spot metering, Center-weighted average metering, Multi-zone metering
Exposure Modes Modes: Aperture Priority, Auto, Manual, Program, Shutter Priority
Compensation: -3 EV to +3 EV (in 1/3 EV steps) 4
Flash
Max Sync Speed 1 / 250 sec
Dedicated Flash System iTTL Groups: 4 Channels: 4
External Flash Connection Hot Shoe
Performance
Connectivity AV Output, DC Input, HDMI D (Micro), USB 2.0 5
Power
Battery 1x BLN-1  Rechargeable Lithium-Ion Battery Pack
AC Power Adapter AC-3 (Optional)
Operating/Storage Temperature 32 to 104 °F (0 to 40 °C)
Humidity: 10 – 90%
Physical
Dimensions (WxHxD) 4.8 x 3.5 x 1.7″ / 12.19 x 8.89 x 4.32 cm
Weight 15 oz / 0.43 kg

Ergonomics

Sony NEX 7: The NEX 7 is characterized by three main dials that control various things depending on what mode you’re in. In full manual they control ISO, shutter speed and aperture. Otherwise, there is a nice hand grip to it, an excellent viewfinder, and overall layout that makes you feel like Sony/Minolta took a rangefinder, updated it for modern needs and fused it a bit with a cyborg.

Just be ready to memorize buttons: many of which are programmable. Also major props to the full tilt screen.

Fujifilm X Pro 1: For users that yearn for the old school feel of a good Contax G2 and Leica rangefinders, this is the camera for you. The dials and aperture ring around the native lenses will give users the full rangefinder experience for the most part. Even the viewfinder is very nice. There are also very few buttons on the camera.

Olympus OMD EM5: With a design that is reminiscent of the old OM SLR cameras, the OMD is a bit different than the other two cameras in this battle. The dials are all in great places and it is also the only camera of the three with a full touchscreen. The screen is just as versatile as Sony’s. It is also the only weatherproof camera in this battle.

Winner: In real life use, and after consulting a couple of members on the staff, we feel like the Sony NEX 7 has this one won. Many of us went on a personal photowalk recently and got to hold and try the cameras. The NEX 7 was the most comfortable in the hand after prolonged use due to the size, weight and the grip design.

Focusing

Sony NEX 7: The Sony NEX 7 has the option of manual focusing (which is the best in class) focusing on a certain area, a specific point, or the entire range. By far, it is the smartest of the NEX line in terms of determining what you actually want to focus on based on your actual composition.

Not only that, but it is also super fast to focus.

Fujifilm X Pro 1: The X Pro 1 has the slowest focusing and oftentimes even misfocuses. However, it has a major advantage in making selection of a specific autofocus point very simple to do.

Olympus OMD EM5: The EM5 the fastest focusing camera of all of them. When it comes to manually focusing, it does not have peaking like the NEX 7 but the viewfinder is so well define that you often don’t even need it. That’s coming from me: a guy that wears glasses. Plus selecting a focusing point can be done quickly through either the button interface or using the touchscreen.

Winner: The EM5 wins not only for fast focusing, but also the ability to get the focusing right the first time in a speedy fashion.

Ease of Use

Sony NEX 7: The Sony NEX 7 is extremely simple to use once you sit there and program all the buttons to do exactly what you want. Then it is just a bit of muscle memory and praying that you don’t need to go through the NEX menus, which can be a bit tedious.

Fujifilm X Pro 1: Aperture, shutter speed, ISO settings, drive, autofocus type, autofocusing points, and playback all with the touch of a button. What else could you ask for? The menu system is also very, very clear cut and perhaps the easiest of all the systems.

Olympus OMD EM5: The EM5 is interesting in that there isn’t necessarily one clear cut way to do anything but instead multiple ways. In terms of menu navigation and getting something done quickly, that is actually pretty darn cool. For example, one can use the touch screen to set the flash intensity or use the button navigation system. Versatility is key here, and Olympus delivers that very well. To boot, there are tons of programmable buttons and you’ll just need to develop the muscle memory.

Winner: This is a tie. The OMD and X Pro 1 both win for the Fujifilm’s ability to put what you need right where you want it but Olympus’s ability to give you the flexibility you want without needing to dig through menus in search of El Dorado.

Lens Selection

Sony NEX 7: Sony’s NEX 7 has a ton of adapters available. They even have an adapter to allow phase detection focusing with Alpha lenses. Plus, Sigma and other manufacturers produce lenses for them already.

Fujifilm X Pro 1: Being the late comer to the game, they still have yet to develop their system but do have third party additions already.

Olympus OMD EM5: Due to having the smallest sensor of the three here, the camera also has the ability to mount nearly anything you could possibly think of. They also embraced the third party community right out of the door.

Winner: The Olympus OMD EM5 wins with no problems.

Image Quality

Sony NEX 7: The NEX 7 put out some of the most impressive image quality I’ve seen to date with a Sony camera. In the right lighting conditions, the 24MP sensor shines quite a bit.

Fujifilm X Pro 1: The X Pro 1′s image quality stayed true to all of the different film emulsions that the company put out before. For those that adhere to the old school way of things, this will help you to predict what your images will look like and a little bit about how to treat the sensor when shooting.

Olympus OMD EM5: The EM5 reminds me of Kodak Portra so much, and I’m absolutely smitten with this fact.

Winner: This is a very, very tough one. Each camera has a ton of color depth and dynamic range versatility. From a technical standpoint, the NEX 7 and Fujifilm X Pro 1 kill the Olympus EM5 OMD. However, I know that in real life use, that none of that means anything. Instead, Olympus’s sensor renders images that look just like film. Personally, I love that. If I really, really had to give this decision to one company though, then the Olympus OMD EM5 would win if paired with the right glass like the Voigtlander 17.5mm f0.95 lens. With any lens attached though, I really do have to admit that I’ve fallen head over heels from the Sony NEX 7.

High ISO Results

Sony NEX 7: The NEX 7 controls noise fairly well and gives a tight grain structure.

Fujifilm X Pro 1: The X Pro 1 smudges the details a bit, but overall does a great job on noise control.

Olympus OMD EM5: The EM5 is finally the Micro Four thirds camera that does well at high ISO settings and that one can use with no problems for professional reasons.

Winner: Despite the fact that there is a bit of smudging, I can often recover the details in Adobe Lightroom 4. With all this said, I thoroughly enjoy the X Pro 1′s rendition.

RAW File Versatility

Sony NEX 7: The NEX 7 raw files are very, very versatile and in real life use only require a tiny bit of massaging to get the look that you really want.

Fujifilm X Pro 1: The X Pro 1 is capable of some outstanding things when it comes to colors.

Olympus OMD EM5: The EM5, while very versatile, will create lots of problems when it comes to drastic amount of color changes and balancing. However, the colors straight out of the camera are often very good and don’t require a ton of editing though much can be brought out of them.

Winner: Again, Fujifilm takes the cake here with the fact that the RAW files are pretty much just as versatile as my Canon 5D Mk II’s.

Universal Support of Third Party Accessories

Sony NEX 7: Sony has partnered with a couple of companies so far, but they honestly need to be pushed a lot more in this respect. Their hot shoe also really limits them.

Fujifilm X Pro 1: At the moment of publishing this piece, Fujifilm has a lot of work to do.

Olympus OMD EM5: When the Micro Four thirds standard was announced, they partnered with a ton of companies to create accessories and support for the system. And overall, they done a damned good job.

Winner: The Olympus OMD EM5 wins my heart in this case.

Conclusions

In truth, any one of these cameras will get you the image results that you want and need. But the major push to get one over the other are the extra features like:

- Fujifilm’s optical viewfinder

- Olympus and Sony’s excellent electronic viewfinders

- Sony’s peaking mode for third party lenses

- Olympus’s weathersealing and ultra fast auto focus

- Sony’s top notch ergonomics

- Olympus’s universal support

- Fujifilm’s bar none image quality

- And…the price.

In terms of standpoints, the OMD is the most affordable with the Sony NEX 7 coming in second and the Fujifilm X Pro 1 taking the cake as the most expensive. This also depends on current lens investments. As it stands, Olympus seems to be able to keep up with the demand the most at the moment, so that may be the one to spring for.

But at the end of the day: I’ve personally bought the X Pro 1 with the NEX 7 and OMD coming in the near future. But if money were no object, I’d spring for the NEX 7 for the resolution. However, I would have to get adapters and also perhaps switch over my entire current lighting kit. That’s just my opinion though.

Please Support The Phoblographer

We love to bring you guys the latest and greatest news and gear related stuff. However, we can’t keep doing that unless we have your continued support. If you would like to purchase any of the items mentioned, please do so by clicking our links first and then purchasing the items as we then get a small portion of the sale to help run the website.

  • http://twitter.com/SpikeHK SpikeHK

    Maybe my favorite post of yours to date!

    I owned the Sony NEX-7 and sold it off to buy the Fuji X-Pro1. I’ve got no experience with the Olympus OM-D but some of the reviews I’ve read have singled out the sensor’s outstanding dynamic range. I don’t understand your awarding the “ergonomics” category to Sony merely because it was comfortable in the hand. I think there’s a lot more to ergonomics than that.

    I thought the Sony took beautiful pictures and I loved the articulating LCD screen. I hated having to remember which unmarked dial controlled which function at what particular time. I disliked many of the lenses natively available for the camera. I had a Nikon lens adapter but with the adapter and some of those Nikon lenses, aside from being forced into manual-only mode, the whole set-up was so large and unwieldy that it made more sense to just use my full-sized DSLR.

    On the Fuji, I love everything except the slow auto-focus, which has caused me to miss many, many shots. However, when everything works, the sensor and the Fuji lenses are capable of producing truly stunning images.

    Spike – spikesphotos.com

    • ChrisGampat

      Your hatred comes with the muscle memory I talked about

      - Chris Gampat
      Editor in Chief
      The Phoblographer

  • fencelizard

    Nice post. I was sold on the OMD for weathersealing (now I still need a decent weathersealed normal prime. I’ll settle for the 60mm whenever that comes out). The Sony is very enticing, but with a couple nice lenses the size didn’t seem that different than just carrying a DSLR. The fuji, with lenses, was a little out of my price range.

    Do you think Olympus could add focus peaking via a firmware update or is it integral to the hardware somehow? The EVF is still not quite sharp enough for me to comfortably use manual focus, especially handheld at telephoto lengths – too much bouncing around.

    • ChrisGampat

      I’m not sure about peaking. With the voigtlander 17.5mm though I see the lines of something in focus kind of stand out more, so it seems to be a bit of peaking but not officially.

    • mooboy

      Hi fencelizard, have you ever tried focus peaking in a Sony camera? I was totally dissapointed with it. I’ve read, and personal experience confirms, using a zoomed live zoom can provide much sharper results. I’m using the OMD with voigtlander 25mm f/0.95 – never an issue getting focus (assuming a still subject :) ).
      The thing I find annoying about zoomed live view, is losing all idea of the framing you have. Instead of focus peaking, I wish they had an option to say, display full image in bottom right corner at 50% opacity etc…
      As for adding focus peaking software via firmware – it would definitely be viable – as it a sotware only thing. No special hardware required as long as the computing engine inside the camera powerful enough – and it should be if can do face detection etc.
      However, the chances of a company adding a feature as big as that in firmware – not going to happen. They’d save it for a new model – especially if there’s any sort of patent licensing involved). If you really need this feature (and I suggest you try it out first) – then I think Sony is only option for you.

      • ChrisGampat

        Why do you hate it? Worked fine for me

        - Chris Gampat
        Editor in Chief
        The Phoblographer

        • mooboy

          I didn’t say hate, just it wasn’t as effective as I thought it would be. But for sure, if given the option, I rather have it than not on a camera – just not a deal breaker for me.
          Maybe I didn’t have it set up right, but it seemed to just highlight the very little area that was in focus. So, saying I was trying to focus on someone’s eyes – it would just highlight the edges of the eyes in red, not colour the whole eye red as I had imagined.
          So, no problem, just then zoom in to see the if the edges are high-lighted – except, once I’ve zoomed in, I can see myself if sharp or not.
          I think when focus peaking will really be useful is when they use zones as I read about in the luminous landscape article. So then I can see my composition and not have to zoom in to check focus.

      • AgNO3

        I use focus peaking all the time. it works GREAT on the NEX 7

  • Heie

    Why was the Pentax K-01 not included in this comparison when it is an extremely viable mirrorless option capable of competing with these cameras?

    -Heie

    • ChrisGampat

      Let’s just say that it’s not a flagship mirrorless camera. As we stated in the beginning of the story, this is for the flagships.

      Take that with what you will.

      *-Chris Gampat*
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

      • Heie

        Last I checked, it’s the best mirrorless offered from Pentax, therefore making it qualify as “flagship mirrorless.”

        In case you were confused (understandable), I was not referring to the Pentax Q, which is a very diminutive camera that uses a small P&S sensor. The Pentax K-01, on the other hand, uses an APS-C sensor, which is larger (therefore at face value better IQ based on pure physics alone) than an entire third (33%) of the cameras included in this test that are considered “Flagship.”

        Or is your definition of flagship being the best offering from a company? Then that’s understandable because the K-01 (again not the Q) is not the flagship offering from the Pentax lineup as there is the K-5 and now K-30 that are also offering APS-C. But then that means the NEX is disqualified by your definition (assuming I got it correct this time) because Sony offers APS-C sensor-sized DSLR-type cameras.

        Let me see if I can understand correctly and see where the Pentax K-01 is rendered not a “mirrorless flagship,” because according to this review and your comment, it clearly does not qualify as such.

        Best mirrorless offered by a company? Pentax K-01 qualifies

        Most recent mirrorless ILC released by the company? NEX-7 DQ’ed

        Best camera offered by the company up to the mirrorless’s sensor size? NEX-7 DQ’ed

        Best camera offered by the company period? NEX-7 DQ’ed

        Only mirrorless ILC camera offered by the company? E-M5, NEX-7, X Pro-1 DQ’ed

        Only mirrorless ILC camera offered by the company in that specific sensor size? Pentax K-01 qualifies; NEX-7, E-M5 DQ’ed

        Mirrorless that doesn’t require an adapter to use primary-mount lenses? Pentax K-01 qualifies

        Best mirrorless ILC offered by a company? Pentax K-01 qualifies

        Mirrorless released by the company in 2012? Pentax K-01 qualifies, NEX-7 DQ’ed

        Mirrorless ILC with an APS-C sensor? E-M5 DQ’ed

        So, Mr. Gampat…what is the definition of “flagship mirrorless?”

        -Heie

        • ChrisGampat

          Maybe you should take the hint that something else is coming instead of being pretentious.

          - Chris Gampat
          Editor in Chief
          The Phoblographer

          • Heie

            So now your reviews include assessing and (dis)qualifying cameras based
            upon unreleased–correction, *unannounced*–models? I’m impressed…

            Once again (sigh), you are avoiding clear-cut questions that are
            actually quite simple to answer (usually begins with admitting fault
            and/or the providing of a legitimate, well-researched explanation that
            is not laced in emotional bias/attempts to derail the crux of the issue
            with topic changing).

            I know many viewers are thinking the same thing: “what is the definition
            of ‘flagship mirrorless’” that you used as the basis for this article? Because “take the hint” does not glean any information that would satisfy that question. I personally perceive that as a cop out knowing that Photokina is around the corner, and there is a high probability that an announcement will be made then. But then again, this goes back to my original point – your review is thus based on an *unannounced* camera model (according to your answer).

            Please realize that you cannot sanely continue to claim to “love to
            bring you guys the latest and greatest news and gear related stuff” when
            the trend for your articles as of late is to be very lacking in fundamentals, and yet when
            confronted about it, your defacto retort is “you people are wrong and
            stop being pretentious.”

            -Heie

            • independentskeptic

              Maybe if you weren’t so freaking argumentative and assumptive, you would have gotten a different response.

              C’mon man. Do some yoga, have a glass of wine, choke the chicken, take an hour and photograph some cool indoor waterfalls… whatever it takes. C-H-I-L-L. Photography is about passion and love. Don’t worry that Chris didn’t include a camera. It’s not a big deal.

              • TL

                What independent skeptic said. Thanks for the great reviews, Chris.

              • MFT admirer-NEX lover

                I think review was about great looking cameras and not a brick with an APS-C sized senser.hahahaah I am a pentax fan and I can tell you there was no need of that UGLY looking camera.Had Pentax released something like NEX or samsung , they would have made a killing man . Just chill out .
                Cheers

    • MikeS

      Why wasn’t the Pentax K-01 included?

      It may have something to do with it being an ugly, unwieldy piece of crap.

      Maybe.

      • ChrisGampat

        We spoke very highly of it in our review, but it was not designed in any way, shape or form to compete with any of these cameras.

        *-Chris Gampat*
        Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
        Twitter.com/Phoblographer
        Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

  • Pingback: My Cool Little Gadgets » Sony NEX 7 Review

  • Gashlycrumb


    Olympus’s sensor renders images that look just like film. Personally, I love that. ” Exactly. That’s why I opted for the OM-D and I have not regretted the decision one bit. Thanks for the great overview.

  • Pingback: Aktuelle Systemkamera Links (13. Juli 2012) - Systemkamera Blog

  • larkorigin

    Just 2 questions;

    If the X Pro1 mis-focuses so much why did you buy it? How bad is it? For example out of a 100 shots how many do you miss due to a bad focus? If it is a high percentage it would rule it out for me…
    Another question is about the RAW files… is the problems with the OMD and the superiority of the Fuji due to your specific work-flow or is it really the file structure?

    • ChrisGampat

      Hey,

      As stated, I got the X Pro 1 at a deal I couldn’t turn down. That, and I’m a reviewer. It’s in my best interest to be invested in all three systems.
      I’d say around 17% misfocusing.

      It’s file structure based right out of the camera. In Lightroom 4 though, you can make both file types look the exact same.

      If you make a purchase, please use our links and banners as it helps to support the site.

      *-Chris Gampat*
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

  • Pingback: Many new Sony reviews! NEX-5n/F3/7, A57, RX100 and lenses! | sonyalpharumors

  • Naomi

    This is perfect! The exact comparisons I needed to read! Thnx Chris

  • yuri

    good thing i read ur review! it helped me alot. thanks!

  • David Cartier

    Very useful comparison – however:
    Fuji RAW files “versatile”? Where have you been hiding?

    • ChrisGampat

      You have to know how to work with them.

      *Chris Gampat*
      Chris Gampat Photography

  • Yeoh

    thanks a lot! i’m struggle in between nex 7 and em5…. after reading i will confirm go for em5 cause of budget constrain… thanks.

Previous post:

Next post: