Review: Pentax K-30

by Chris Gampat on 07/09/2012

We’ve shown initial sample photos from the Pentax K-30 (K30) and we’ve also run the darned thing under a faucet. After about a month of use, constant communication with the company, and even calling in other products, the K30 is perhaps the most impressive entry level DSLR camera that we’ve seen. I’m not just saying that from my point of view, but this also applies to at least half the staff (who reside here in NYC) who have tried it out and also tried out other competing DSLR cameras.

In a nutshell: the Pentax K30 wins our Editor’s Choice, but it comes with its quirks.

Gear Used

Tech Specs

Specs taken from the B&H Photo listing of the item

Imaging
Camera Type Digital SLR with Interchangeable lenses
Lens Mount Pentax K
Camera Format APS-C / (1.5x Crop Factor)
Resolution Effective Pixels: 16.3 Megapixels
Max Resolution: 16 MP: 4928 x 3264
Aspect Ratio 3:2, 16:9
Sensor Type / Size CMOS, 23.7 x 15.7 mm
File Formats Still Images: JPEG, RAW
Movies: AVI, MJPEG, MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV
Bit Depth 12-bit
Noise Reduction Not Specified By Manufacturer
Memory Card Type SD
SDHC
SDXC
Image Stabilization Optical
Focus Control
Focus Type Auto
Focus Mode Single-servo AF (S), Continuous-servo AF (C), Manual Focus (M)
Autofocus Points 11
Viewfinder/Display
Viewfinder Type Pentaprism
Viewfinder Coverage 100%
Viewfinder Magnification Approx. 0.92x
Diopter Adjustment - 2.5 to +1.5 m
Display Screen 3.0″ Rear Screen  Live Preview LCD (921000)
Screen Coverage 100%
Live View Yes
Exposure Control
ISO Sensitivity Auto, 100-12800 (Extended Mode: 100-25600)
Shutter Type: Electronic
Speed: 30 – 1/6000 sec
Remote Control Optional
Mirror Lock-Up No
Metering Method Spot metering, Center-weighted average metering, Multi-zone metering
Exposure Modes Modes: Aperture Priority, Auto, Manual, Program, Shutter Priority
Compensation: -5 EV to +5 EV (in 0.3 EV steps)
White Balance Modes Auto, Cloudy, Custom, Daylight, Flash, Fluorescent, Fluorescent (Day White), Fluorescent (Natural White), Fluorescent (White), Shade, Tungsten
Flash
Built-in Flash Yes: Flash On, Red-eye Reduction, Second-curtain Sync, Slow Sync, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction
Effective Flash Range Not Specified By Manufacturer
Max Sync Speed 1 / 180 sec
Continuous Shooting Up to 9 fps
Dedicated Flash System eTTL Remote Firing
External Flash Connection Hot Shoe, Wireless
AV Recording
Video Recording Yes
Audio Recording With Video, Mono
Performance
In-Camera Image Editing Filter Effects, Miniature Effect, Monochrome, Red-eye Correction
Start-up Time Not Specified By Manufacturer
Shutter Lag Not Specified By Manufacturer
Self Timer 2 sec, 12 sec 1
Interval Recording Yes
Date & Time Stamp Yes
Connectivity 1x AV Output, USB 2.0
Wi-Fi Capable (With Optional Transmitter) No
Software Requirements Not Specified By Manufacturer
Power
Battery 1x PEDLI109  Replaceable Lithium-ion Battery, 7.4VDC, 1050mAh
AC Power Adapter PEACAOK (Optional)
Operating/Storage Temperature Operating
14 to 104 °F (-10 to 40 °C)
Physical
Dimensions (WxHxD) 4.8 x 3.1 x 2.3″ / 12.19 x 7.87 x 5.84 cm
Weight 20.7 oz / 587  g No battery or memory card

Ergonomics

The Pentax K30 is an extremely beefy DSLR for the price point and for the audience it is targeted towards. Most prominently, I’d emphasize just how comfortable the grip on the camera is. On said grip, what you’ll also notice is an infrared trigger light there as well. That is also where the on/off switch, shutter release button and the program exposure and exposure compensation button are located.

Around here is also the first of two control dials as well. Yes, Pentax put two dials for exposure on the K30, and it is a godsend in terms of ergonomic comfort and control.

On top of the camera is the mode dial: which also includes some Pentax custom modes that are assigned to specific dials as it is. Plus there is a textured thumb grip area that adds to the overall comfort of the camera.

The back of the camera is characterized by quite a brilliant LCD screen and the viewfinder above that. To the right of all this are the main controls. To the top left is the Live View/Delete button. Honestly, I wish this were on the right side as well. It would just make more sense in real life use.

Autofocus

I need to get this part out of the way, and unfortunately it is probably the camera’s biggest pitfall. The autofocus on the Pentax K30 isn’t exactly the greatest and in fact it was sometimes extremely frustrating. While on a shoot with a model, I didn’t always have time to pixel-peep my images to ensure that I had absolute focus. Plus, the LCD screen was just so sharp that I honestly thought that I did. But utilizing the outer focusing points caused some major problems.

First off, when you’re trying to take portraits, you have a couple of choices:

- Set the camera to automatically choose from 11 autofocus points (a fairly viable option)

- Set the camera to automatically choose from 5 (not so much that viable when it comes to portraiture)

- Manually select one of 5 points (therefore disabling the ability to use all of the other settings assigned to the hot keys such as wireless flash control fine tuning, ISO control, etc.)

- Manually select one of 11 focusing points (the most viable option but with the drawbacks of the previous fact.)

In a case like the photo to the left, I needed to use one of the outer focusing points and hitting Jamie’s eye wasn’t exactly the simplest thing to do. My original vision was to have the lens wide open and only have a bit of fill flash coming in using the AF-540Z in a Photogenic SB2432 with a Chimera Speedlite Speedring. Instead, I needed to stop down and blast Jamie with light.

So why do I need to use the outer focusing points to begin with? Why couldn’t I focus and recompose? Because then I’d throw off the plane of focus. It would be nice if Pentax utilized something like Hasslebald’s TruFocus system that was designed for those types of photographers.

When the focusing was spot on though, it nailed some extremely nice images and the potential of the K30′s sensor combined with the very good 16-50mm f2.8 DA * was fully realized.

Something else that must be praised was the fact that the image stabilization system built into the sensor seemed to rival Olympus’s. And that’s a bold statement.

Here are some other images from that shoot:

See how the focus is right behind Jamie? I was aiming for her eye.

Something else that also must be stated is that Pentax’s P-TTL system seemed to work best when the flash was in the hot shoe and not in a modifier. These images in the bedroom were all taken by bouncing the flash off of the wall.

Ease of Use

Sans the autofocusing issues that I encountered, the Pentax K30 was extremely simple and straightforward to use, for stills that is. When it came to video, I encountered a problem that hopefully Pentax will fix with a future firmware update (from the time of publishing this piece). In video mode, a true videographer would want to shoot in manual video mode. When doing this, only the shutter speed and ISO can be adjusted: not the aperture. That’s a big problem; and instead I would probably opt for third party glass in this case.

The biggest joy though probably came from the fact that I was able to go out and shoot in the absolute pouring rain with no issues at all. The camera was drenched but survived it all like a champ.

Indeed, Dumbo in Brooklyn became so flooded that boats were ready just in case of anything since it is right by the water.

Image Quality

The overall image quality from the camera was exceptional, though at times I wished that the colors out of the camera were a bit more saturated than they were and that the green color depth could have been a tad bit deeper. Here are some images not only showing off the image quality, but also the versatility of the files when put to the test in Adobe Lightroom 4.

For more, you can check out our initial sample images.

High ISOs

Overall, I did see a little bit of smudging of details at the higher ISOs. However, the noise levels were nearly negligible and it required only moving the slider around one or two places in Lightroom 4 to correct it.

What must be said though is the fact that the camera white balances and captures some really, really wonderful colors at night and at higher ISO settings. Pentax did an excellent job with this.

Metering

Pentax is spot on with the metering. During my excursion with the rest of the NYC Press, I did formal Sunny 16 tests and the camera’s meter worked perfectly with the logic.

With that said, I would not be afraid to use it with manual flashes and studio strobes like anything from Profoto or Elinchrom.

Conclusions

For the audience that this camera is targeted towards, Pentax has given them quite a bit of power. Due to the ergonomics and including two dials, the user can grow significantly with this camera. When you reach a certain point, you often don’t want to have to press the exposure button in order to switch the aperture and shutter speed. To boot, this camera has a great sensor, is weather sealed, and is still fairly light though beefy feeling at the same time.

My only problem was the autofocus system, which I truthfully consider to be a tad bit worse than the Canon 5D Mk II’s. I know that Pentax fans will try to rip us apart for that, but our tests showed otherwise.

If you can get over the autofocus system, I highly encourage you to spring for the Pentax K-30 and enjoy their line of limited prime lenses and their constant aperture zooms.

Please Support The Phoblographer

We love to bring you guys the latest and greatest news and gear related stuff. However, we can’t keep doing that unless we have your continued support. If you would like to purchase any of the items mentioned, please do so by clicking our links first and then purchasing the items as we then get a small portion of the sale to help run the website.

 

  • Pingback: The Complete, Continuously Updated Pentax K-30 Review File | THEME

  • http://www.AroundAnnArbor.com/ MichaelG

    “My only problem was the autofocus system, which I truthfully consider to be a tad bit worse than the Canon 5D Mk II’s.”

    C’mon….

    How about an apples to apples comparison? The 5D-MkII is selling for $2100 (B&H) and the K-30 is priced at $850. Seems more like an expectations adjustment is in order. What about its ‘focus peaking’ feature, or the ability to micro-fine tune its auto-focus to fit the unique characteriatics of a particular lens? How does it compare to the K-5, or K-R, its predecessor? I look forward to an update once you get more experience with the K-30.
    Cheers… M

    • ChrisGampat

      You’re joking, right?

      Newer entry level DSLRs should be outdoing the 5D Mk II in terms of focusing at this point.

      We’ve had a ton of experience with the DSLR, and the 5D Mk II was a reference point; we’re currently in the process of sending the camera back. As it stands though, I heartfully believe that our review was a ton more thorough and fair than many of those out there.

      *-Chris Gampat*
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

      • Jin

        It’s surprising to hear about the AF issues, most K-30 users are now saying how the AF is a huge stepup from the k-5.
        The review was pretty fair (nice model :D ) – although more pictures of shooting in the rain would have been nice to emphasize the WR on an entry level camera.

        • ChrisGampat

          Take a look at our video of it being run under a faucet. It’s hyperlinked.
          *-Chris Gampat*
          Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
          Twitter.com/Phoblographer
          Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

          • Jin

            Yep – I’ve seen that, it’s really cool!
            Just a quick question – in reading the review of the AF portion, it seems the issue isn’t specifically the AF being accurate, but that it was very difficult for you guys to land the AF points where you wanted them to be. Is it a fair assessment to say that it is the lack of AF points (11) that is the issue, not AF accuracy?
            (Side note – I know about Pentax’s AF system having very large points, which tends to make focusing difficult because the points would pick something else to focus on).
            With that in mind, I don’t think either the Canon nor Nikon’s latest entry level (T4i/D3200 respectively) will be that much more amazing at 5 point AF either.

            • ChrisGampat

              It’s the same thing. If it isn’t accurate based on the specific single point I’m asking it to focus on, then it isn’t where I want it to be.

              *-Chris Gampat*
              Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
              Twitter.com/Phoblographer
              Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

      • http://www.ohhtography.com Paul Monaghan

        I have a k5, and as I read the k30 had an improved version of the AF over my k5 yet you seem to be having trouble?

        I don’t find the AF in my k5 to be bad, in-fact even after using a nikon d3 for a while I didn’t feel the k5′s AF was bad.. not quite as fast, not as good at tracking and with less point (but the ability to select the edge of the fame was a plus).. so the new AF on the k30 is a downgrade over the k5 version even though its men’t to be upgraded?

        One thing to note if you are not so used to using pentax’s stuff is that the red AF squares are MUCH smaller than the AF sensors.. In-fact the AF sensors to be honest are a little to big and this can cause the camera to lock onto something of higher contrast in the background.

        I shot some skaters a while ago using my k5 and da* 50-135 (known to be a slow AF lens) and it was doing a great job of catching them.

        Also as
        MichaelG said, you didn’t mention focus peeking.. which from the user reports ive been reading can actually make focusing faster using manual glass than relying on AF.

        As for Pttl, its not something I used often as id rather use radio triggers and manual flash’s but the times I have used pttl it has worked fine for its uses. On board flash controlling a flash in a brolly and it was working fine with another bare flash as a rim. Did you disable the on-board flash to make it a controller only or was it set to contribute to the exposure?

        The other thing I would like to know is if the k30 also supports the manual sensor movement of the k5.. I love this feature turning all my lens into shift lens for product or landscape shots.

        • ChrisGampat

          During my excursion with other journalists in NYC, the focus either worked or it didn’t. There is no other outcome.

          When I’m doing studio work, I’m not going to use peaking. I’m going to use that for video. And the fact that the aperture can’t be changed in video mode defies all laws of cinematography.

          I had no reason to test the manual sensor movement very much though I did play with it a bit. Each reviewer here tries to incorporate the items into their shooting style and workflow. And I wouldn’t do that with portraits.

          *-Chris Gampat*
          Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
          Twitter.com/Phoblographer
          Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

          • http://www.ohhtography.com Paul Monaghan

            If I understand the peaking didn’t work in video.. I haven’t used one but it would make sense if it did.

            The peaking imho would be great in a studio, I’ve seen some awesome work done with the k-01 using just that. Also it would be nice for outdoor stuff using lens like a samyang 85 f1.4. I don’t know about you but using manual focus glass is a nightmare with modern AF screens and while you can get a replacement they run around £70 for a cut canon 5d MF screen (around the best you can get).

            Its a big feature to miss out just because its not something you are used to using.

            • ChrisGampat

              I’ve used manual focus lenses in the studio before with no problems when I shot medium format film.

              *-Chris Gampat*
              Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
              Twitter.com/Phoblographer
              Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

              • http://www.ohhtography.com Paul Monaghan

                There’s a big difference between a MF camera’s viewfinder and that of a crop camera :) , hell even a FF like the d3 feel’s like looking out a large window so I can see why you would have no problem then.

                Trying to nail manual focus using a crop view finder with fast glass is impossible with modern AF screens as they don’t actually register focus below f2.8 in some cases as they are designed to be bright for easy viewing. If you change the focus screen (as I have done before) then its a different story. Focus peaking saves you from buying and replacing the screen and gives you great fast way to get critical focus easy.. no need for focus re-composition or swapping af points.

                About the AF did you try the new expanded AF option on the k30? This apparently uses data from other sensors around the one you selected to get focus as well as if the subject or you moves.

                I rather enjoyed your review and I’m not trying to pick at it or you but I find pentax’s AF in the k5 at-least to be really good,much better than a 5d mark1.. not used a mark2 but it has the same/similar AF? so your comment has me worried and that’s why i’m posting :)

                • ChrisGampat

                  “Trying to nail manual focus using a crop view finder with fast glass is impossible with modern AF screens as they don’t actually register focus below f2.8 in some cases as they are designed to be bright for easy viewing.”

                  I encourage you to go try Rokinon lenses with a Canon 5D Mk II and then put it on a Canon 7D. The latter has a 100% viewfinder and in all of my reviews I say that it is always easier to manual focus on a crop sensor vs full frame.

                  The K30 has a 100% viewfinder as well. It shouldn’t be an issue.

                  The camera failed in terms of AF performance, but also I don’t think you guys are reading the whole thing. It is also an issue of the interface with selecting the specific focusing points.

                  *-Chris Gampat*
                  Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
                  Twitter.com/Phoblographer
                  Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

                  • http://www.ohhtography.com Paul Monaghan

                    Selecting the points is really easy on my k5, unless they changed something?

                    The D-pad does double duty, In one mode it’s used to change options on the camera and by holding it in for a few seconds it switch’s changing the AF points. Generally I’ve never had a problem with this set-up as if I’m changing af points then I’m not worried about white balance and so forth.. but the k-5 does have a dedicated ISO button.

                    As for FF v Crop for manual focus, I found it much easier to MF on a d3 even when it was pitch dark mostly just because of the size of the screen… having 100% viewfinder has nothing to do with it as that just let’s you know you can see everything your camera does. Its the size of the focus screen (crop is much smaller) and also the focus screen it’s self. Some screen’s stop registering a DoF difference faster than f2.8 its just down to the surface of the focus screen itself and modern AF screens are made to be bright. There is a major difference between a AF screen and a MF screen (even ones without split prisms)

                    The reason an 85 f1.4 might seem easier to nail the focus on a crop is because of the larger DoF if both FF and Crop are set to give the same FoV.. I have tried and tried with my k5 using fast manual focus glass with the default AF focus screen and nailing focus faster than f2 is impossible because I cant actually see the real DoF of the lens and when it looks in focus it can be a little in front or behind, focus trapping can help though (set the camera to AFS and with the focus set to focus priority hold the shutter and the camera will fire when the AF sensor gets focus)… but in my k10d with manual focus screen I nail it every time.

                    Thanks for the time you took to write the review and also replying :)

                    • ChrisGampat

                      Yes! And I missed that!

                      With the K30, you need to first enable selecting of the points manually and then you can choose 5 or 11. To choose the point, you need to use the directional buttons. But the functions then get nullified. Like flash control, ISO, etc.

                      In real life practice, that’s a giant pain.

                      *-Chris Gampat*
                      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
                      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
                      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

                    • http://www.ohhtography.com Paul Monaghan

                      I honestly found it a bit of a pain too when I first got my k5 but after having the camera for a while it became second nature and it seems like a nice way to get double use of the buttons.. I’m guessing you can still switch between the two modes by holding the middle button? if not and you had to goto a menu to change it over then it would be a big fail in the design department but if you can switch it as with the k5 once you use the camera for a while it won’t bother you at all.

                      For the price point of the k30 It seems they have done really well :)

                    • ChrisGampat

                      I did have to go through the menu.

                      *-Chris Gampat*
                      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
                      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
                      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

                    • Dafydd

                      For what it’s worth I own the K-30 and although you have gone through the menu – the system described from the K-5 by Paul is carried over. Simply holding down the central OK button switches the outer 4 directional buttons between moving the AF points & their original modes ISO/Flash/WB etc.

                      I’ve not encountered the AF issues you describe yet either but I don’t go for portraiture much. Fingers crossed.

                    • ChrisGampat

                      Didn’t work for me. I haven’t sent mine back yet. I just tried it again too.
                      - Chris Gampat
                      Editor in Chief
                      The Phoblographer

                    • Dafydd

                      And you’ve got firmware 1.0? Curious indeed. I’ll put up a video showing this functionality when I get home tonight.

                    • ChrisGampat

                      We got a small boosted version. It was like 1.0.3 or something like that. I made sure I updated it before we published the review. Pentax confirmed with us that the firmware would be in all production units.

                      *-Chris Gampat*
                      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
                      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
                      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

                    • Dafydd

                      After moving from the K20D to this camera I found myself initially in the same boat as you, wondering how on earth just a silly setup could exist. I ended up using the LV button quickly so could re-enable the directional buttons. Not long after that I realised I could press the OK button to switch to and from focus point selection (and thus also prevent accidentally moving the focus points should i bump the directional buttons when shooting).

                    • ChrisGampat

                      We couldn’t. It was quite frustrating. I was hoping that I could’ve programmed another button to do so too, but no, we couldn’t.

                      I spent an exhaustive month with this camera, probably longer than any other New York press. Engadget and everyone else got their up almost immediately and hell, I even called in other items to test it thoroughly as is our editorial philosophy. But it didn’t work.

                      Our review and decision stands, and unless a firmware update fixes this, it won’t change.

                      Additionally, I want everyone to keep in mind that this camera got an freakin’ EDITOR’S CHOICE. That, and to calm down.

                      *-Chris Gampat*
                      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
                      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
                      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

                    • Dafydd

                      Haha stop flapping, all i’m saying is that this feature already exists. I will make a video demonstrating it, that is all. I do not doubt that for some obscure reason your camera did not work, but nevertheless if I prove this feature exists and functions as described – surely you would be remiss not to update your review to reflect this? Even with the caveat that it did not for your particular camera.

                      Cheers.

                      I do agree some people are quite ridiculous in their criticism – saying images are crap is just lame, and reflects poorly on those individuals.

                      I’m also pleased that the camera gained an Editors Choice, as it is a pretty neat bit of kit for the price and class.

                    • Dafydd

                      And here you are :) Camera displays firmware as ver1.00

                    • Jin

                      Thanks for sharing this – this is how I access my focus points on my Pentax k-x as well. Very easy and quick.

  • Maru

    It is called “impression” ^^! … for what ?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Kenneth-Escalona/1379131980 Kenneth Escalona

    Well since it is a new AF system, Pentax will fix it via firmware update. May Falk Lumo can test it and check the results. Anyway, a very good initial review.

    • ChrisGampat

      We had a firmware update as well actually throughout the testing phase. My camera was updated during the more serious sessions with the camera.

      *-Chris Gampat*
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Sérgio-Dinis-Silva/1660251154 Sérgio Dinis Silva

    I just hope Pentax brings a few affordable Weather sealed lenses with this camera…
    PS: I also think the 5D comparison is way over the line, a 650D however is exactly the same price, so that would be a nice camera rumble.

    • ChrisGampat

      Totally not way over the line when the autofocus system is ancient, and older than the camera itself.

      That’s saying a lot.

      *-Chris Gampat*
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

  • SpoorthyVemula

    You should try a different lens other than the 16-50. The 16-50 is an extremly slow focusing lens. Even my 55-300 focuses faster.

    • ChrisGampat

      I tried the 18-135 during the excursion and other primes.

      Same performance issues.

      *-Chris Gampat*
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

      • SpoorthyVemula

        have you checked out the live view af? Ive heard that its extremely fast.

  • Heie

    Good review for the most part, and as you guessed it, Pentaxians are criticizing you for your AF section. I appreciate the attention to the ergonomics, which I insist are one of Pentax’s strongsuit, and in my experience, by far.

    Regarding the AF, I can’t help but feel there has to be an issue some where. I have read numerous accounts of new owners heralding the AF performance of the K-30, to including watching one guy have it track flying magpies (crow-like birds out West). Without trying to come off as insulting, perhaps it is be user error. Even with just my K-5, I have absolutely no problem getting focus on an eye when doing a static portrait shoot. In fact, I’m shocked you had trouble with a single point of a completely mobile subject – something my Pentax K-7 can still do without issue. Like I said, this is the only negative review I have found regarding the K-30′s AF, and something is not congruent, and without being biased towards any sources, I am purely using sample size (and my own experiences with inferior AF systems that are years old) to see there isn’t a correlation with your review and the general consensus (thus far).

    One issue I also have is your lack of ANY mentioning of focus peaking. In fact, I find this completely derelict of your duty as a reviewer and thus negligent. FP is an extremely useful tool, especially with the thousands of otherwise obsolete manual lenses available to the Pentax system by virtue of the system’s legacy compatibility. No other camera of this class offers it (either the FP or the compatibility of all those lenses), and for you to completely neglect even mentioning such a thing (like a resurrected 50mm f/1.7 manual lens that is stabilized and has an accurate “auto focus” for under $50) demonstrates the lack of comprehensiveness of your efforts. And then to claim that because it isn’t something you use thus doesn’t deserve to be added to your review further chips away at your credibility and the ultimate usefulness of this “review.”

    Another issue I have is the lack of mentioning of the in-camera HDR processing. While a gimmick to some, it’s especially useful for those of us who use HDR blending because of the expanded dynamic range it provides you. No other camera at this price point offers this (Nikon entry level cameras don’t even offer *bracketing*), and for the traveler on the go and/or the RAW-averse, this is an extremely useful and unique capability that only Pentax offers. Even the most casual mentioning of this option (which many don’t even know exist, especially new and uneducated consumers looking for their first camera – something you influence directly) would have sufficed.

    Additionally, I have to admit that the photos included are extremely subpar, and in my opinion do nothing to demonstrate the purported capabilities of the K-30′s image quality, which, since it uses the same exact senor and PRIME M as the K-01, should be nothing short of *outstanding*. In my personal opinion, they look very altered, and not in a “here’s-a-4-stop-underexposed-RAW-image-to-see-what-could-be-recovered-through-its-dynamic-range” kind of way, but rather an either high contrast or flat look that is very unappealing. I personally would be embarrassed to exhibit these photos, even on Facebook, much less on a professional camera review.

    Also, where are the incremental ISO shots of the same scene that demonstrate the noise control in JPG versus RAW from the ISO floor to ceiling, and the comparison of those shots from competitors’ images?

    Lastly, it unfortunately seems the reviewer is not the proper person to conduct a review of an entry-mid level camera because of his continued false correlations and comparisons that lead to underwhelming expectations when viewed in regard to cameras that are not only out of the league of the K-30, but entirely different formats. Mentioning it would be nice to incorporate a feature unique to $40,000+ Medium Format Hasselblads and AF systems of Full Frame cameras–yes outdated, but Full Frame nonetheless–is nothing short of immature and just plain wrong.

    I have much respect for the Phoblographer, and like I said above, I think some great things were said, especially with attention to the ergonomics and the second control wheel that are hard to objectively qualify and quantify. However, I am very disappointed by the lack of comprehensiveness and quality control of this review when you consider the complete personal and purposeful neglect of some serious innovations for this price. For having the camera for an entire month as you claim, this comes off as very lazily completed. Furthermore, the complete defensiveness of the reviewer when professionally and legitimately criticized in the comments section demonstrates a lack of professionalism unbecoming of such a revered organization.

    Very Respectfully,
    Heie

    • http://twitter.com/alvinlwh78 Alvin Leong

      I agree, many of the sample pictures do look like crap!

      • http://twitter.com/JohnOlinda John Olinda

        Alvin, any chance we can see some of your photos for comparison?

        • Paul Wren

          If you can’t tell when a picture isn’t right then why ask another person to show you theirs? It’s plain to see that the picture of the signpost, most of the building pics need straightening (or even better just take the shot with a level horizon), or the fact that a ‘renowned’ journalist like Chris shouldn’t be able to focus on someone’s eye when they’re motionless. Is Alvin claiming to be a pro photographer and offering reviews? Maybe, maybe not…But I don’t think that qualifies you offering to critique his pictures. Why not link some of your own?

          • http://twitter.com/JohnOlinda John Olinda

            Sure thing Paul: http://500px.com/johnolinda

            • Paul Wren

              I’m happy that you enjoy your hobby John and I’m not going to degenerate this thread any further than it’s gone already by making any undeserved derogatory comments towards your pictures, although if you want me to critique I’ll be happy to. But please understand that it won’t be a case of massaging your ego or indeed mindless petty squabbles either. I stand by my original comment above when I say I don’t think you should be offering to critique other contributors photographs in a tit for tat defence of the above pictures/hip shots. All the best and enjoy what you do.

  • SpoorthyVemula

    You should make a seperate editors choice page (something like what dcresource.com does)

    • ChrisGampat

      It’s in the works.

      *-Chris Gampat*
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

  • SiliconJaguar

    I really enjoyed this review of the K-30. I’ve been looking for an upgrade path from my K200D for some time now and the K-30 is almost there bar the missing option of a battery grip. :(
    I as specially enjoyed the reviewers choice of photographic subject.
    An amazingly beautiful Asian woman with stunningly large breasts and amazing art work.
    If only Pentax could bundle these with the K-30 I think sales would go through the roof! ;)
    .-.-.

  • Dafydd

    Just a minor nitpick really, but considering the cameras comparatively diminutive dimensions your opening paragraph
    “The Pentax K30 is an extremely beefy DSLR for the price point and for the audience it is targeted towards.” must refer to value/features for money – although this could potentially be misread if someone didn’t have great English. Something like feature packed, or heavily endowed (although that’s potentially worse hehe..)

    Also maybe worth pointing out that lenses equipped with aperture rings can be used for changing aperture during movie mode with (M)anual mode. Thankfully all the nice legacy glass with slow predicable focus throws of course have aperture rings. Still, you would have to compensate on the fly with shutter speed and the noise of the aperture ring clicking is going to be in the audio track so not ideal.. A pitty to be missing in-cam on the fly adjustments to be sure. However I suspect without external audio jack/HDMI, it won’t be used too seriously for video work outside of family gatherings skate vids with mates and so forth.

    Thankyou for your review, even if it has raised some spirited responses!

    • ChrisGampat

      The rule of video is to not change shutter speeds. You use a variable nd filter

      - Chris Gampat
      Editor in Chief
      The Phoblographer

  • Will

    Yes, Pentaxians are a defensive bunch! :P

    One clarification which I think you ought to make – it is possible to select the aperture manually in video mode, either by selecting from the camera immediately prior to starting filming, or by using the aperture ring during filming. Lenses lacking an aperture ring won’t let you alter the aperture during a take, but I’m not sure why you’d want to do that if you’re serious about filming.

  • Paul Wren

    I sighed as soon as I saw that you would be writing this review Chris. You’re way too biased towards Canon and ill informed in other areas to offer a full unbiased review of anything other than what you know. I think you may have become a little too dinosaur like in your approach to other brands. As for comparing the K30 to the Canon EOS 5D Mk II they are completely different kettles of fish, you told me so yourself when you talked me into purchasing the Mk II over the Pentax K5. I’m looking at maybe buying this camera as a second cam backup (dependent on whether a K5 successor is announced later this year) but I also knew that I wouldn’t get a full in depth unbiased review as soon as I saw your name on it.

    The pictures that were shown as your samples were nothing to write home about, and like many others here I think that’s more down to who is behind the camera not the camera itself. Pentaxians defensive? I think it’s more a case of Chris being defensive over a mediocre review. Please let someone else with the ability to look upon alternate cameras instead of Canon write a fresh review, someone that has the willingness to explore, experiment and give a totally unbiased look at whatever else is out there!

    • ChrisGampat

      I think you’re all misreading the review. I talked about the 5D Mk II’s autofocus; which is a 10 year dinosaur as it is.

      Also, this camera still received an Editor’s choice. I don’t believe I’m the one that’s biased. Finally, many cameras go in and out of my hands every day, so I have more than enough familiarity with the system.

      *-Chris Gampat*
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

      • Heie

        I will try to be as polite and respectful as I can:

        Your complete and utter failure to admit fault, combined with your reply
        that “everyone is reading my faultless review incorrectly, thus making
        you all wrong while I’m still right,” have now gotten to the point of
        proving Mr. Chris Gampat as too biased and thus incompetent to complete a
        review in this regard. Even more disheartening is your lacking the
        professional maturity to accept criticism, which is very clearly evident
        by your incessant denial of every commenter that disagrees with you,
        and as your most vocal critic, the complete ignoring of my above set of
        criticisms over 24 hours ago – no acknowledgment whatsoever despite 5 replies on your behalf to other comments since that time.

        No one expects perfection. But as intelligent, educated, and mature
        (from what I have seen here in the comments) followers of your
        publications, we expect a dialogue that is mature enough to recognize
        and admit fault, not play these games of “I’m right and you’re wrong
        because I’m right!” that we all pray have been left behind in elementary
        school. This ultimately not only derides yourself, but soils the
        Phoblographer’s
        name as a whole (because, as the Editor in Chief, you are the face of
        the organization).

        The consensus is overwhelming: “We are still eagerly waiting for a legitimate review to be completed for the Pentax K-30.”

        Very Respectfully,

        Heie

  • http://twitter.com/JohnOlinda John Olinda

    Very interesting, I’m starting to notice more and more reviewers point to Pentax as the “dark horse” manufacturer of DSLRs. As a pretty committed Nikon user it would be hard for me to change out a whole system, but it definitely sounds like a perfect system for anyone getting into DSLRs or as a backup to a pro-level Pentax.

    The second control dial is great, my one problem with Nikon’s lower-end cameras is that they hobble them with only one control wheel, so I appreciate the way Pentax gives you stretching room in an entry-level camera. If Pentax fixes the aperture issue in video mode along with tweaks to the AF system that’ll be one feature-packed little camera.

    • Jin

      That second control dial is an enormous boon for anyone who is upgrading from a k-x/k-r (or any entry level CaNikon). Some days I’m stuck with using Av mode because it’s a pain in the butt to hit the button to switch between shutter and aperture on my k-x. It is a brilliant feature to put on an entry level camera..
      Do people really change aperture while shooting video? I don’t do video, but the idea of changing aperture while the video is actively recording seems weird.

      • http://twitter.com/JohnOlinda John Olinda

        At least from my own experience doing video, you’re locked into an aperture once you’re in live view, whether you’re recording or not. So to change apertures you have to leave live view and come back after adjusting which isn’t the end of the world, but definitely annoying when you’re moving quick. It would seem from what @ChrisGampat:disqus said that you at least have to stop recording with the K-30. I’ve never understood whether this is just a firmware issue (on my D7000), or if there is a physical issue that can’t be easily overcome. Since using manual lenses doesn’t completely bork the camera in live view, I assume it’s firmware related.

  • fabri

    Dear Chris, comparing K-30 to 5dmarkII or Hasselblad is just terribly wrong. Did you see the price tags? I believe you didn’t. Next time do the same kind of comparison between a Canon xxD / nikon dx000 and a Phase One and then tell me if some canon/nikon user will be a little upset with your review. Moreover, your pictures are too bad to show at least the IQ of this camera, please do a second set and try to do a better job.

    • ChrisGampat

      1. the 5D Mk II’s focusing system is pretty much 10 years old. It is being used as a comparison example. The new rebels incorporate a newer focusing system.

      2. Hasselblad’s system is more ancient and if you don’t understand TruFocus, you people should really do your research. It lets you focus on a subject point, recompose, and it will move the plane. You know who else does that? The Micro Four thirds tracking focus system and Canon’s 60D and T3i with faster aperture lenses; hence the reason for choosing an f2.8 lens for this review.

      3. I would love to see any of the work that you guys do. Seriously, point me at porfolios.

      We give this camera an Editor’s Choice and you people sit here and get upset because you don’t understand an Autofocus system.

      *-Chris Gampat*
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

      • Paul Wren

        Chris, I think maybe you should calm down or lock this thread. As referring to readers and critiques as ‘you people’ is not only not very nice but it’s a death knell for any support that you may or may not expect from your blog community. Also feel free to critique me on my personal portfolio @ creatioex.com Critique away, I like to take pictures and claim nothing more…I’m also not the one writing reviews and getting upset when missing points are mentioned.

      • Reid Borcich

        Chris, I realize this is an old thread, but ‘you people’, really??? ‘Us people’ are your clients. That being said…
        I am looking to get into photography. I have only had point and shoot up until now. The price point, features, and weatherproof qualities of the K30 really peaked my interest. I am trying to find out if this camera is capable of producing professional quality shots without having to spend countless hours tweaking the shots with photoshop. I am mostly interested in outdoor photography and I am somewhat rough on equipment (it will get wet).
        It seems to me that if the AF didn’t work, Pentax should have sent a replacement overnight.
        Would you recommend this as a 1st camera, or is there a better choice for under a grand?
        Thanks,
        Reid

        • ChrisGampat

          The best way to get pro shots without lots of tweaking is to have a creative vision and execute it with knowledge of metering. With that said, this sure can.

          - Chris Gampat
          Editor in Chief
          The Phoblographer

  • fabri

    you removed my comment!! you don’t like being criticized, don’t you? is that difficult for you to face other people’s opinions? i think you are not so comfortable with your profession. as I said before, please go for a second set and try to do a better job.

    • ChrisGampat

      No one deleted your comment. Our backlog doesn’t even have your comment in the system.

      *-Chris Gampat*
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

      • Paul Wren

        Then there must be a bug on the site as my comment has also been removed/disappeared (comment was @ John Olinda in respects to his comment to Alvin):-

        “If you can’t tell when a picture isn’t right then why ask another person to show you theirs? It’s plain to see that the picture of the signpost, most of the building pics need straightening (or even better just take the shot with a level horizon), or the fact that a ‘renowned’ journalist like Chris shouldn’t be able to focus on someone’s eye when they’re motionless. Is Alvin claiming to be a pro photographer and offering reviews? Maybe, maybe not…But I don’t think that qualifies you offering to critique his pictures. Why not link some of your own?”

  • http://www.facebook.com/andrew.munster Andrew Munster

    i might disagree with parts of your review, but when you disagree with the reviewer you don’t have to make it a personal attack..

  • http://www.facebook.com/andrew.munster Andrew Munster

    Btw the custom image setting allows you to produce higher saturated images i never shot with the normal setting. thats a good hint when using pentax cameras.

  • pinbalwyz

    You didn’t mention there’s no microphone jack to use while in video mode.

    • Jin

      This is true – it seems they want to keep the microphone jack for the higher end camera.

  • http://www.facebook.com/msatlas Mike Atlas

    I know a bunch of people are harping on the AF issue. But I mean, the camera is *supposed* to let you quickly switch between manual focus point selection and the indicated functions of the arrow buttons. So it’s a little surprising that feature never worked for you. Look at the OK button on the back of the camera, in your own picture of it. The square icon with the four arrows is indicated the ability to switch the controls with the OK button. I have a K-r and had a K-x, and holding the OK button worked as it was supposed to on both of those cameras. It takes a few seconds and beeps when switching the controls.

    • ChrisGampat

      We sent the camera back to Pentax already.

      *-Chris Gampat*
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

      • http://www.facebook.com/msatlas Mike Atlas

        Fair enough. I don’t mean to jump on the dogpile and it seems like a lot of folks here have gotten a little too worked up about a camera review. It’s just a camera! ;)
        As a Pentax owner, the overlapping AF point selection is one of the few things that annoys me about my camera(s). I’d rather have a dedicated AF point control. So you certainly bring up a legit concern. But it wouldn’t hurt to at least mention in the review how the camera is (in theory) supposed to work, even if it didn’t behave that way for you. Something like,
        “Pressing and holding the OK button is supposed to allow switching between manual focus point selection and the indicated functions on the arrow keys. But this didn’t work on our review unit.”

        • ChrisGampat

          I’ll consider an update.

          As it is, the 645D is supposed to come in to me next, and I’m currently swamped in units.

          *-Chris Gampat*
          Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
          Twitter.com/Phoblographer
          Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

  • http://www.facebook.com/sdphoto35 Steven Davis

    hokum complete hokum :( too bad the this overpriced paperweight is being touted as anything but.

  • chuma

    Q:”Is this the best DSLR Camera Ever?”
    A: NO.

  • JJ

    Hi, i got a layman’s question: Does it make any sense to have a weather sealed body without a weather sealed lense? Are there any (affordable) lenses I can use to shoot pictures in the rain?

    • ChrisGampat

      It depends on if you’re shooting in tough weather or not.

      Otherwise, I’d suggest the 55m f1.4 DA*. Any DA* lens is weathersealed. If you’re making a purchase, please use our links to B&H or Amazon.

      *-Chris Gampat*
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

  • CiaoPaparazzi

    Autofocus is the only thing that’s important.

  • http://twitter.com/artdavinci artdavinci

    My favorite camera is nikon s d800 love the megapixels on this camera.

Previous post:

Next post: