First Impressions: Nikon D3200

by Gevon Servo on 07/07/2012

Well it has not been a quiet time here. It has been hot with lots of events going on. Amongst all this, I received a Nikon D3200 test unit. We have begun our review and here are a few test images as well as my initial thoughts. I reviewed the Nikon D3100 last year and the idea of this review is nice for me. The camera is on the low end of the range and is not as refined as other Nikon cameras, but does it have potential?

Tech Specs

Product Highlights from B&H
24.2MP DX-Format CMOS Sensor
EXPEED III Image Processor
3″ 921K-Dot LCD
AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-55mm 3.5-5.6G VR Lens
11-Point Autofocus
HD 1080p Video
Live View
Up To ISO 12800
Optional WU-1a Wireless Mobile Adapter

Gear Used

Build Quality

When I first picked up this camera, to examine it, I was less than enthused with its build quality. Clearly there is some concern. For some context, I am a long time Nikon user and I have certain expectations of its cameras, however I was not thrilled with the D3200. I shot with it, Sid by side with my D90, My D700, my Nikon EM Film camera and from what I remember of the D3100 , this camera feels, well, toyish. what  It was like “what the bleep were they thinking?”The camera does not feel solid. I pushed on though, and placed my 40mm 2.8′on the camera, one of Nikon’s newer lenses.

 Doubt

After taking this camera out of the box, I greeted it with a sad smile, cynicism, and apprehension. A significant shift for me, I am, usually, an understanding Nikon Fan boy. By all accounts, though, this camera just seemed wrong. It is all about perceptions or points of views. I think I looked at this camera in a subjective way and that was wrong. Let me just say it is not the same quality as its predecessor, even with the better sensor, or so it seemed.

 Perspective

I had to change the way I looked at this camera to understand it and to take pictures with it. I put the camera in my wife’s hand, she liked it. She’s not a photographer. The first thing that caught my interest with this camera, when I first heard about it, was the sensor and all the new technological advances. Looking at the it I had to ask myself “what is my job with this camera?” How am I to give you a proper review without my biases? I decided to ignore the outward aesthetics so I could  take an objective view of this camera. I am reserving final judgment on everything until I go through the camera thoroughly.

Rethinking

I had to rethink this camera after going through the images. This is important, never judge a book by its cover. This camera is deceiving. On the outside, it has “issues”. Its end result is far better than everything else about the camera. The end results were fantastic. Despite all my current misgivings, I have to thoroughly go through this camera. I have to rethink who this camera is for and how it can be used. This camera has me baffled. We all know this is about taking pictures and the D3200 does that well.

The Nikon 3200 seems to be a distillation of current high end Nikon cameras. As most of Nikon’s entry level DSLR’s its simple to us but it feels lacking in its physical presence. Much to is to be gained, however, by using it  and seeing the final results. Its does have similarities to its predecessors, but like most of Nikon’s new cameras, it’s a change from the past.

To be continued in the full review.

Please Support The Phoblographer

We love to bring you guys the latest and greatest news and gear related stuff. However, we can’t keep doing that unless we have your continued support. If you would like to purchase any of the items mentioned, please do so by clicking our links first and then purchasing the items as we then get a small portion of the sale to help run the website.

  • Steve

    The D3200 offers a lot of camera for under $700 with a cheap lens! The DX chip is HUGE 24 million MP’s something Medium Format cameras were doing 4 years ago. Like most cameras the glass is the real key to picture quality and this camera will only use the motor equipped lenses that are very good but this does shorten the list if you have older equipment. I still have perfect glass from 20 years ago so Nikon really needs to figure out how to make their smaller DX cameras use non internal motor lenses work. This camera will work for 90 percent of all people who are not pros and I would still use it as a backup camera. Nikon really screws up only one thing on this camera and I think it is a big one, the 11 point auto focus needs to go! Sony is killing Nikon with very fast auto focus in both the video and camera modes not including the fact that Sony makes almost all of Nikon chips now and the drive motor and anti-shake are in the camera body. Nikon also needs to make the video go for more than 20 minutes before cool down because I can’t tell a class of kids to take a break during their play for a camera cool down break. I love my Nikon’s but Sony is really putting it to Nikon / Canon in both innovations and cost. I would use this camera without worry but the Gap between Nikon and Sony is now pointing in the direction of Sony. The one place that Sony has failed in is the flashes they offer and so far Nikon is the leader.

    • ChrisGampat

      Actually they were the latest leader. Canon now crushes them.

      - Chris Gampat
      Editor in Chief
      The Phoblographer

  • CGW

    Agree with Steve. Canon and Nikon have yet to crank out a credible MILC/EVIL
    system camera that comes close to the game-changing models from Sony,
    Olympus, Panasonic, et al. They plainly don’t get it and probably won’t any time
    soon. The demographic buying upscale gear now has little or no
    familiarity with film cameras, hence no reluctance to purchasing something like a Sony NEX with virtually no family resemblance to SLRs of yore.

    Not sure why the reviewer didn’t wait to produce a single review. This preamble is a bit pointless.

    • ChrisGampat

      Totally not true coming from dealing with tons of photography students. If they can’t afford something better after using film, they go for the affordable stuff.

      - Chris Gampat
      Editor in Chief
      The Phoblographer

    • Gevon Servo

      This camera gave me a lot to think about. I chose to do this to show samples and share what I initially thought about this camera. After working with it , I have a totally different view of the camera.
      Thanks for reading.

  • CGW

    Really Chris? Not too many students in my area use film and haven’t for years.
    Note I said “upscale,” not entry level DSLRs whose poxy pentamirror
    viewfinders and so-so LCDs aren’t a patch on OLED EVFs and better LCDs.Film cameras are a fading memory–sadly.

    • ChrisGampat

      Still beg to differ. I work with ICP, SVA, Maine Media, NYFA and other students. They’re still using film in terms of personal camera usage because it’s what they can afford. Then they move up to more affordable digital cameras. Not everyone has a trust fund and can afford a 5D Mk II right off the bat.

      Bryant Eslava is an excellent example of a guy that still uses film and worked his way up to the 5D Mk II and Fujifilm X100.

      *-Chris Gampat*
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer

      • CGW

        Affordability is key, Chris. No fight there. Problem is that analog
        workflow can be awkward and pricey if labs and shops have largely
        abandoned film and the infrastructure supporting it. I know it still
        works in NYC but not here in Toronto where used trailing edge DSLRs are the tool of choice for student photographers.Unless you can handle a home darkroom for C41/E6/b&w processing, film can get capital-intensive quickly at anything more than very low volume shooting.

  • http://twitter.com/intensitystudio Antonio Carrasco

    The Nikon D3200 is a great camera. I had my doubts before I bought it. But then when I started shooting with it, I was blown away by image quality.

    I actually like the lightweight and smaller size of this camera. I find myself taking it with me a lot more than I did with my D90.

Previous post:

Next post: