Review: Adobe Lightroom 4

by Chris Gampat on 04/13/2012

Adobe’s Lightroom series of products have often been championed as the best software out there for photographers to use for most jobs. Indeed, most of the staff uses Lightroom. When the Beta came out, I sat there at a cross-roads. I’ve used Capture One Pro before, and loved it. The color rendering engine blew my mind away. It still does in many ways. But Lightroom has the advantage of quicker updates for various RAW files types from newer cameras.

Then Adobe provided a review copy of Lightroom 4 for me for evaluation; and I started to compare the two much more.

Tech Specs and Requirements

Windows:
Intel Pentium 4 or AMD Athlon 64 processor
Microsoft Windows Vista with Service Pack 2 or Windows 7 with Service Pack 1
2.0 GB of RAM
1.0 GB of available hard-disk space
1024 x 768 display
DVD-ROM drive
Internet connection required for Internet-based services

Mac OS:
Multicore Intel processor with 64-bit support
Mac OS X v10.6.8 or v10.7
2.0 GB of RAM
1.0 GB of available hard-disk space
1024 x 768 display
DVD-ROM drive
Internet connection required for Internet-based services

Adobe online services and other third-party online services are available only to users 13 and older and require agreement to additional terms and/or Adobe’s online privacy policy. Online services are not available in all countries or languages, may require user registration and may be subject to change or discontinuation without notice. Additional fees or subscription charges may apply

Notable Upgrades

The major upgrades in Lightroom 4 that we will focus on for our audience include the following:

- Develop module tweaks

- Softproofing

- Video editing

- Map Module

However, Lightroom 4 does include other updates such as the book making feature.

Develop Module and Editing

In the beta version of Lightroom 4, we were introduced to some new sliders that I really didn’t like. Lightroom 3 made me so familiar with the recovery, brightness, clarity and fill light sliders. Truthfully, it also made editing much easier in general. Lightroom 4 got rid of all of those except for clarity: but clarity has now been tweaked to also increase the exposure/brightness at certain points. It can be a bit annoying but overall, it does a great job. It has overall just made me rely more on the sharpening tools in anything.

New to the module is:

- Highlights: Which controls the highlights level and after some playing around with it found that it did the same thing as recovery did. However, it seems to be much smarter than recovery was and controls other areas of the image that you sometimes may not want modified. So you’ll often need to tone it back a little.

- Shadows: This provides the same functionality as fill light, but only seems to touch the deepest, darkest areas of the image.

- Whites: This is a brand new one that really throws some interesting play into the mix. The whites bar literally controls the white levels and can sometimes have an affect on the highlights.

In Lightroom 3, I was often able needing to only adjust those previously mentioned bars. In Lightroom 4, I’m adjusting each of the new ones often little by little as well as almost every other slider in the interface. The result is that it forces me to become a more creative and careful editor and also therefore can give me better images.

There are also a few more presets.

Softproofing

Being a photographer who rarely prints, I often rely on softproofing more for editing images for the web. However, I also actually rarely use the feature. But it’s a nice one to have. When it is enabled, a virtual copy of the image is made that keeps your original image (typically the RAW) in its untouched state so you can apply all the adjustments you need first and then sync the changes to the master copy. What I used to do before was simply just press Command + Z to constantly go back to my previous edits or simply use the history panel to go back to a certain point in my edit.

To take the most advantage of this, I recommend having a calibrated monitor.

In all fairness though, I still often feel that the editing workflow in Capture One Pro gives me better colors with less work. However, the way Lightroom 4 was designed forces me to become a more careful editor.

Video

Perhaps the biggest feature that I looked forward to the most is also the one that let me down the most. While one can view videos in the Library panel and also apply minor adjustments, I wanted to be able to do more such as stitch multiple videos together and splice them in a timeline and finally export them. With the way I’ve been trained to shoot (I actually come from cinematography school, not photography) all I would really need is color and exposure adjustments.

If we really wanted to get into this, sound editing would also have been excellent, but then we’re asking for too much.

Map Module

The Map Module further embraces the needs that people have for GPS tagging.

Wait…what?

Not many people Geo-tag their images, but it is often seen on Flickr for example when someone wants to know where a scene was photographed. There are consumers though that don’t want people to know where something was shot.

The mapping module is fairly simple to use though. Once you click far enough into a map, you can simply drag an image there and it will work with Google to Reverse Geo-tag the image. It’s quite interesting, but hardly very useful.

Conclusion

Adobe chose to not make major updates to Lightroom 4 because many photographers were very happy with it to begin with. However, what they did update makes sense for where the industry is going. Adobe acknowledged that many photographers also do minor video editing and want that in one software: but they didn’t take it further enough. They also decided to work with photographers that want to print and those that work a lot with the web.

In the end though, Lightroom 4 still leaves me wanting more. For example, I really wish that the clone and heal functions would have been made into actual brushes instead of spots. That’s something we really need. Additionally, I personally feel that Softproofing could have been eliminated if photographers overall were just a bit more careful, paid attention to the history panel, and took lots of great care. The way that Lightroom 4 is already set up, it forces you to take better care when editing.

However, I can’t fault the program except to say that Capture One Pro still gives me better colors without as much hassle. But I’ve already entrenched myself into Lightroom’s workflow and management of metadata: which is far superior to anything out there.

Please Support The Phoblographer

We love to bring you guys the latest and greatest news and gear related stuff. However, we can’t keep doing that unless we have your continued support. If you would like to purchase any of the items mentioned, please do so by clicking our links first and then purchasing the items as we then get a small portion of the sale to help run the website.

  • rchrd881

    I have the 4.1 release candidate and it seems that clarity has changed quite a bit from 3.4.  It now imparts an  HDRish look that I really like.  

  • Macjim

    I bought the upgrade from Lightroom 3 to Lightroom 4 when I became available just over a month ago, and I’ve regretted it. Why, well, Lightroom 4 broke the external edition so I was unable to use Nik Silver Efecs Pro 2 etc. the ‘fix’ from Adobe was to offer the Lightroom 4.1RC — this did indeed fix this problem and allowed us to use our external editor softwares but it broke Flickr uploads from inside Lightroom 4 ! If you check the Lightroom forums, you will find many many users up in arms with Adobe as they seem to be unable, or are just being pigheaded, to get a working fix out. My opinion is this, Adobe should never have released this version of Lightroom until it was working properly. We Lightroom 4 users seem to be their guinea pigs and Beta testers — this should never have been the case and I feel quite strongly that Adobe should refund us the money we paid for this flawed software. I tried the 4.1RC version but ended up rolling back to 4 so that I could still use Flickr uploads. Funny enough, if you did a clean install, rather than an upgrade, there wasnt a problem with Flickr uploads as it was a new link to Flickr, it only affects existing Flickr links! Argh!

    • Michaelina2

      Perhaps your LR4 NIK/Flickr issue is Mac related. I operate in PC-world. All of my  externals (NIK included) function in LR4.0 as they did in LR3.x. In fact, NIK provided some updates that enhance their offerings. Plus, my Flickr upload link works as it did in previous iterations of LR. The upgrade to LR4 from LR3.x was seamless with no glitches. So far, I’m pleased with LR4 and see no reason to ‘LR4.1′ until it’s officially released, if even then. Cheers… M

      • Macjim

        Nope… It’s affecting both Mac and Windows. If you go to the Adobe labs forum and check out the Lightroom 4 forum, you’ll see many feeds from frustrated users, myself included. Adobe’s have said they are working on a fix but this fix is to — ahem — fix all other problems! The biggest complaint is over the time it’s taking Adobe to actually bring this out as we are well over a month since the problems arose. If you haven’t had a Flickr account link with Lightroom before, such as with my MacBook Air, there’s no problem. It only happens if you upgraded from 3 with a linked Flickr uploader. The Adobe work around is to make a new Flickr link, not one of their greatest suggestions. Don’t get me wrong, I like Lightroom very much but if this had been an Apple programme, we’d have heard this load and clear everywhere.

  • Pingback: Review: Adobe Lightroom 4 | shootplex

  • EarlHarrisPhotography.com

    I also bought the upgrade from LR3 to LR4, but as I was a relatively new LR3 user, the differences aren’t all that apparent to me. I do, however, applaud the image cataloging and management features in LR. It simplifies my workflow tremendously while offering me the functionality I’ve come to depend on via Adobe Camera RAW.

  • http://twitter.com/mikemuch Michael Muchmore

    Chris, Check out LR4′s lens profile correction. Does a much better job than 3 on CA.
    Another cool thing about the geo-tagging is that you can import a GPX file from a smart phone GPS tracker app you carry around with you during the shoot, and sync it to your pix for auto placement on the map. But make sure the time is set right on the camera. Adobe claims to have done a ton of work on Auto toning, too, based on 1000s of sample images. They said that nearly everyone surveyed says they don’t use Auto, but telemetry tells them that 1/3 do use it.

  • Lance Levine

    Lots of Lightroom users having major problems with Lightroom 4.  Waiting for Adobe to fix this but not sure when this fix will be.  Wish they would communicate better.

  • Pingback: Cheap Photo: Rebates That Will Make Your Spouse Force You To Sleep on the Couch

  • Pingback: Useful Photography Tip #22: Take a Moment to Think Things Through

  • MGW

    The map features is really useful and innovative for those of us who need to know later exactly where a photograph was taken. There are lots of us.

  • Jasdev

    I will plan for pet photography.

  • Pingback: Article: Review: Adobe Lightroom 4 « Howard Photography

Previous post:

Next post: