Field Review: Shooting at a Wedding With a Mamiya 7 II and Slow Film

by Chris Gampat on 11/17/2011

I love film. The Yashica Electro GSN captured my heart a while back and so did the Leica M7. Thankfully, I was recently loaned a Mamiya 7 II medium format film rangefinder with an 80mm f4 lens. Coincidentally, Kodak also was kind enough to hand me rolls of Tri-X 400 and Ektar 100 recently. Even better: a friend of mine recently got hitched. So how does the Mamiya 7 II perform while shooting handheld in extremely dim situations and with slow film?

Ergonomics

The front of the Mamiya 7 II seems to have an eye that looks you squarely in the face and says, “shoot with me. We’ll make a great team together.” Despite how elegant it looks, the camera is amazingly capable or doing some very high level professional work. It is a medium format camera after all. It is characterized by few buttons with the only ones being of major importance being the lens release and delay shooting timer.

The top of the camera is where all the business goes down for the most part. Up here you have a special dial that serves the purpose of controlling exposure compensation, shutter speed and ISO setting.

- To control exposure comp, use the button of the side of the dial and adjust.

- To control the shutter speed, just turn the dial.

- To control the ISO setting, pull the dial up and turn.

There is also a hot shoe, film advance and film counter. Plus the lens will allow the user to control the F stop manually. Because of this, the camera has only manual and aperture priority. There is no shutter priority or program mode. Not that that is much of a problem; this is a camera meant for pros.

Also, the shutter release is here as is the on/off switch right around it.

The side of the camera features the lever to pop the back open and a spot for a sync cord.

The back of the camera is where you can load the film, frame and focus, and set a multi exposure setting if you’d like.

The bottom of the camera is where things get interesting:

- The circle with a straight line in it on the left pop out when the inside latch in the film container is released.

- The circle with a lever on it is for closing off the tunnel between the lens and the film so as not to expose it at all.

- Next to that is a button that pops up when you’re ready to take out the film from the camera. It needs to be pressed back in when you want to shoot.

Focusing

Focusing the camera is done through the viewfinder and the camera focuses line any other rangefinder (see that here.) There is also paralex correction for when you focus at certain distances. All focusing needs to be done manually.

In Use

The Mamiya 7 II feels very good in the hand. Once again, it is also very elegant. The grip is smooth and is not textured to give you a better grip on the camera. Nor is the camera heavy at all. In fact, I find it lighter than my DSLRs. When snapping a photo, you’ll also notice that there is also no vibration from the shutter at all. However, the camera is indeed so quiet that you sometimes can’t even tell when the camera has opened the shutter and then closed it.

During the wedding I shot at f4 and in aperture priority the entire time. If I were getting paid, I wouldn’t be doing this and I’d be in full manual mode. However, this was all just for fun.

I shot very few usable images with the Kodak Ektar 100 that night simply because the hall was just so dimly lit. However, I got more keepers with Tri-X 400. Indeed, the latitudinal range of black and white film is enormous.

When the lens is able to stop motion and when there is no camera shake, it is super sharp. Unlike in the photo above. This was extremely difficult to capture.

A complaint I have about the camera has to do a little bit with the viewfinder. Don’t get me wrong, it’s big, bright and gorgeous. But why Mamiya would choose to make the shutter notification numbers on the bottom so small is beyond me. The company should have made them larger.

Throughout the night, I really wish that I had a flash. Sure, rangefinders were designed to really not be used with a flash (unless you’re Bruce Gilden.) But I would have loved to have used one at Lauren’s wedding. Granted, if I did, I know that my full scale photographer mode would have went off.

Though the quietness of the shutter will not alarm anyone around you despite how large the camera is, it is sometimes so quiet that even I can’t hear it. So if the shutter is open, I don’t necessarily know that it’s going to close later on. Further, the viewfinder will display something along the lines of LTE for a longer exposure mode. And you won’t know just how long the camera will shoot for.

Tri-X seems like it was designed to be used with this camera. Unfortunately, I was a bit disappointed with the performance of Ektar 100. However, I do understand that this was an extremely low light situation and I am willing to forgive it a bit.

Conclusion

So would I recommend the Mamiya 7 II?

In this case, yes yes and yes. I screwed up in this case because I brought a slower lens and not enough fast film. But if I was better equipped with that film, the photos would have been much better.

Would I buy one? Interestingly enough, I’ve been considering it. I’m at the stage in my career where I can tell the difference between film and digital and full frame and medium format. The only problem is that there comes a point where the negative can only do so well when scanned in. Additionally, I don’t want to buy a medium format digital camera.

For the seasoned professional looking for something different or if you want the absolute best rangefinder camera that you can find out there, take a look at the Mamiya 7 II.

Please Support The Phoblographer

We love to bring you guys the latest and greatest news and gear related stuff. However, we can’t keep doing that unless we have your continued support. If you would like to purchase any of the items mentioned, please do so by clicking our links first and then purchasing the items as we then get a small portion of the sale to help run the website.

  • http://twitter.com/JohnOlinda John Olinda

    Great review, looks like a worthy camera!

    • Anonymous

      Thanks John!

      Chris Gampat,
      Editor in Chief
      The Phoblographer

  • John Smith

    If this doesn’t sell the Mamiya 7 II, nothing will. The Ektar was a tad disappointing, but I always found it that way. Flash or no flash, the black and whites are great. Thanks!

    • Anonymous

      Thank you for the kind words. They mean more to mean that you imagine.
      *-Chris Gampat*
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer
      The Phoblographer on Google +
      The Phoblographer on Tumblr

  • patrujo

    I shot my first wedding 9 years ago with a mamiya 7/80mm and a c330f/ 180mm lens. and 160nc  I was just staring out and the huge negs were overkill, but the couple loved them.  With negs that big you should have brought portra 800. 

    • Anonymous

      Kodak didn’t give me Portra 120 :(

      *-Chris Gampat*
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/Phoblographer
      Facebook.com/ThePhoblographer
      The Phoblographer on Google +
      The Phoblographer on Tumblr

  • WestCoastJim

    During, I believe, the 2000 Presidential campaigns, my friend David Hume Kennerly shot a  one year long book project that resulted in a book titled “Photo de jur”.  It was shot entirely with the now ancient Mamiya 7 II.  All the while he was shooting on the job with Canon EOS 35mm… He shot, naturally, and incredibly one darn decent shot a day.  365 images with this camera.  I’m pretty sure mostly with the 43mm wide angle.  Not the normal.

    • Chris Gampat

      I’m going to need to buy that book now…

  • Pingback: The Best Budget Off-Camera Flashes and Constant Lights at The Phoblographer

  • Rra00000

    I’m not sure why I keep looking at this site. I guess I find it hard to believe that someone who is such a poor photographer and writer actually has a web site. All of the shots above are improperly exposed, out of focus,  poorly composed, or sometimes all three. Maybe you should stick to being the “Editor In Chief”, whatever the hell that is.

  • Pingback: Camera Film Photo » Blog Archive » Field Review: Shooting at a Wedding With a Mamiya 7 II and Slow Film

  • http://twitter.com/TSSPro David Farrell, Jr.

    Right tool for the right job- Ektar, not going to be what you want in a dimly lit ceremony/reception. The bright and sunny before portraits- yes- great- awesome choice. The examples given, not such a good choice for that particular stock of film. It exacerbates color temperature differences between light sources because of its saturation and contrast.

    I think that if you have not used this particular system, or had reasonable experience with the films used, it is unfair to pass whole sale judgment on the shooter doing the review or the tools used.

    That tri-x can be pushed A LOT, especially with a large neg like that, and, even if you were the shooting this for a client the avg enlargement from reception/ceremonies dont venture into the wall portrait category, your negs wont show the wear and tear on the film that pushing that Tri-X to 1600/3200/6400 ISO. The portra lines of films will handle the mixed lighting and the dim and weird color combos that you get at indoor venues a lot better than than most other color films, its what they were designed for.

    The 7 series of rangefinders is no walk in the park to get accustomed to if you are coming from a smaller format SLR and its also not the cheapest to invest in.

    Hope that some of your readers will get a chance to use this type of camera and run a few rolls through it, if not for the pictures, then for the experience of using such a foreign system and to possibly throw them out of their comfort zones creatively.

    All the best-

    • Mannock

      Having used a Leica M3, I tried the Mamiya 7 and found little difference in the handling. It is a very comfortable camera. Come spring I will probably buy one. Expensive? Well, that is relative. Thanks for sharing, David.

Previous post:

Next post: