Why I Chose The Olympus EP-2 Over the Fuji X100

by Chris Gampat on 06/21/2011

Her name is Mary-Jane: and she is my beloved Olympus EP-2. I’ve compared it against the Fuji X100 before, and many people couldn’t tell the difference between the two cameras’ image quality. But beyond the image quality, there are many reasons why one would want to consider other cameras over the Fuji X100. Now don’t get me wrong, I gave the X100 a very good review and it is indeed a well loved camera, but in the end we must not only remember that it’s the photographer that takes the images but also that some tools are easier to work with than others.

Before you continue reading, please note that this piece is my opinion and that I’ve recently taken to the philosophy of embracing a camera’s flaws to work for me instead of working against it. That means if the high ISOs will destroy an image, I’ll use the Art Filters on the camera. If the focusing isn’t working correctly, I just may not go for the image instead of struggling. Additionally, I may go for a totally different angle instead or stop the lens down and use the hyperfocal length method of shooting.

Cost in the Package

The Olympus EP-2 and 17mm pancake lens is around half the price of the Fuji X100. What you’re paying for with the X100 is a better sensor, an optical viewfinder, great body construction, and a quietly sexy profile.  Many readers couldn’t tell the difference between the two cameras in our image quality/lens test. Though the Fuji X100 did reteach me a couple of things about street photography, it first and foremost made me remember that gear lust is indeed just that—gear lust. There is quite a bit of hype around the X100 and rightfully so (see our review), but the same things can be done with the venerable Micro Four Thirds camera.

Also keep in mind that it’s your technique and in the end, the photographer that ultimately takes the images. It just so happens that crosswalks are always a great place to find those images.

Instagram and Hipstamatic: But More Powerful

If you’re an iPhone or mobile photographer, perhaps you know about Instagram, Hipstamatic, Vignette, and Retro Camera. The great news is that you can achieve those same effects with the EP-2 and an Eye-Fi Card, and then send them off to the web.

Though we ripped them apart in all of our previous reviews of Olympus cameras, the Art Filter feature is actually quite fun to use. What’s more, you’ll be able to achieve some effects that you may not necessarily know how to pull off in Lightroom or Photoshop. In time, I’ve come to embrace the Cross Processing, Pinhole, Pop Art, and Grainy Film modes because they almost come close to what I’d do to achieve these effects in post-production anyway.

Although the Fuji X100 has film modes, the same creative possibilities aren’t present as with the Olympus EP-2.

Interchangeable Lenses

Do you know how wonderful the Zeiss Biotar 58mm F/2 lens is? It’s an M42 lens from way back and can be adapted to my EP-2 very easily with an M42 adapter. Not only that but if I want, I can switch out to the very good Panasonic 20mm F/1.7, 14mm F/2.5 and other primes. With the Fuji X100, you’re limited to a 35mm equivalent focal length. Now, what if you’re not a fan of that focal length? And what if you want another lens of some sort? You’re stuck with just that one.

Now keep in mind that the Fuji X100 was designed with a very particular audience in mind and that said audience/target market would probably go for that focal length and forget about the rest. But as I’ve seen from talking with other Micro Four Thirds users, they are generally the same: they only go with a couple or one focal length and work with the specific characteristics of that lens. However, the fact that I have the option to swap out has been very useful to me in various street photography situations.

Autofocus

Make no mistake: when these cameras are focusing in fully lit situations, they shine. However, when it comes to low light, only one can focus better than the other—or so you think!

When not focusing at what is considered macro distances for both lenses, I’ve found them both to be roughly equal, with the EP-2 being a slightly tad bit faster and miles faster in low light. For reference, I’m using the 17mm F/2.8 (Olympus’s own lens).

But when it comes to macro focusing (4 inches away to around a foot) the Fuji X100 is faster and the contrast AF system on the Olympus can hunt a bit. Minimum focusing on the Fuji X100 is around 3 feet before you need to switch into the Macro setting—and at three feet the Olympus is still winning.

The Manual Focus is Actually Useful

Manually focusing the X100 (which I tried to do at times and that I sometimes do with my EP-2) is slow and not very accurate. Though the viewfinder for the X100 is very bright and displays a distance scale on the bottom of the screen for you to see how far away you’re focusing, the EP-2 will magnify the focused area by 10 or 7 times for you to achieve absolute perfect focusing.

When you combine all of these factors together, the more affordable options do indeed start to look better.

Please Support The Phoblographer

We love to bring you guys the latest and greatest news and gear related stuff. However, we can’t keep doing that unless we have your continued support. If you would like to purchase any of the items mentioned, please do so by clicking our links first and then purchasing the items as we then get a small portion of the sale to help run the website.

Also, please follow us on Facebook, Flickr and Twitter.

 

  • Peter Frailey

    Nice article.  I have neither camera but would make the same choice you did.  Related to the interchangeable lens advantage of the Oly, is that the Oly is “upgradeable” in the future… in that you just need to buy a new body to get any new sensor or processing engine, while with the X100 you have to replace the entire camera (body + lens).

    • Chris Gampat

      Thanks Peter, I appreciate the kind words.

    • Anonymous

      Quite true Peter, though that one lens has been designed specifically to work with the X100, which is also nice. But you’ve got a damned good point.

  • Spoorthy Vemula

    One thing that is totally overlooked is the capabilities of the x100 in low light. For street photography that is very important.

    • Anonymous

      Hey Spoorthy,

      It’s not overlooked at all and I noted the stellar performance in my review.
      But the EP2 with a fast lens can also perform very well and using the art
      filters can embrace the iso problems to give you a better image.

      Either way, even the X100 will still need editing at the higher ISO
      settings. Even my 5D Mk II does and everyone is bashing it.

      Does any one remember just how amazing that camera is? In the hands of a
      skilled photog, it can rock.

      Chris Gampat,
      Editor in Chief
      The Phoblographer

  • Carl Zeiss

    How about the single most important reason to prefer the EP-2?

    You know, the fact that you can actually use different lenses with different focal lenghts on it?

    • Anonymous

      Hi, see section that says “interchangeable lenses.”

  • Pingback: Review: Olympus EP-3 (and 12mm F/2) at The Phoblographer

  • AH

    The image quality of the EP-2 is not as good as that from the X100. Especially high contrast photos taken with the EP-2 has a lot of noise in the dark areas even at ISO 200. That is one of the reasons I sold my EP-2. Also the highly praised attachable view finder is a horrible beast. I thought I would use mine a lot when I got it, but it is so awkward when attached and the quality is really not very good IMHO.

    • Retro

      I strongly disagree as an owner of both the ELPL and X100 I find the pen produces a much better image out of camera. The color, tone, metering and detail from the EPL1 combined with 20 1.7 just deliver a richer image. The X100 does better at high ISO. I have struggled to appreciate Fuji’s colors and the metering tends to be hot for my taste. While the Fiji on lens is great, it’s no match for the 20 1.7. The Fuji is one of those cameras whose sex appeal is what drives sales, once you get it home and the honeymoon is over, you are left wondering why you spent the money.

      • AH

        I agree that the out of camera color images from the x100 are not optimal, but it takes some time to learn how to get the best out of the x100, but once you learn to use it and apply a little post processing the output is much cleaner than the output from an EP-2.

        Can’t speak for the 20mm 1.7, but there is a lot of image processing going on in the PEN to take care of the huge distortion from the Olympus 17mm which I owned (together with the 14-42mm). This may be part of the images not being optimal.

        You can of course make very nice images with the PEN, but I just didn’t like the “muddy” look and amount of noise even at ISO 200.( I do like the colors it produces).

        I should say that I own a very good Eizo CG245W monitor which reveals most technical problems with an image (if you care to look for it – i.e. doing a litle pixel-peeping).

      • AH

        By the way the 20mm is nice, but mainly in the center. Borders are not that fantastic.
        Take a look here (includes images): http://www.photozone.de/olympus–four-thirds-lens-tests/464-pana_20_17. The Fujinon lens easily competes with the 20mm or even surpasses it.

  • AH

    The image quality of the EP-2 is not as good as that from the X100. Especially high contrast photos taken with the EP-2 has a lot of noise in the dark areas even at ISO 200. That is one of the reasons I sold my EP-2. Also the highly praised attachable view finder is a horrible beast. I thought I would use mine a lot when I got it, but it is so awkward when attached and the quality is really not very good IMHO.

  • Pingback: Why I Chose The Olympus EP-2 Over the Fuji X100 – The Phoblographer (blog)

  • Anthony Mouse

    What about high speed sync?

    • Anonymous

      EP2 can only go to 1/180th, I haven’t tried it with the FL-50R

      -Chris Gampat
      Editor in Chief, ThePhoBlographer.com
      Twitter.com/ChrisGampat

  • Pingback: Why I Chose The Olympus EP-2 Over the Fuji X100 at The Phoblographer | fozbaca’s WordPress

  • Pingback: Review: Leica M9-P at The Phoblographer

  • Hadi

    Dear all please note Fuji X100 focusing with latest firmware kicks ass trust me!!!!!!!!!!!! very fast !!

Previous post:

Next post: