Field Review: Fujifilm X100 (Day 2)

by Chris Gampat on 05/05/2011

After just getting a feel for the camera in Day 1 and comparing the image quality with the EP-2, I’ve taken the Fujifilm X100 to work. Today, it spent the entire day by my side through a variety of situations: while on the streets, portraits, tracking moving cars, and shooting flowers. And I’m sad to say that I’m not totally pleased.

Quirks

At first I thought that it was just me that had problems with this camera and when I read other previous reviews, I thought to myself, “Wow, that couldn’t happen!” So here are my problems:

- When the camera goes to sleep, it’s impossible to wake it up.

- When you shoot a photo, it doesn’t display it on the LCD screen, only in the viewfinder. Except if you’re shooting with the LCD, then you’re fine. This went through 10 other people besides myself: all of them being very good photographers.

- Metering: oh man is this an issue. I’ll get to it soon.

- Focusing is weird, if you’re up close and personal with someone (like this camera was designed for) you need to switch to macro focusing. And Macro focusing switches itself off. Yes, this is extremely annoying.

- I couldn’t find an area in the menu to see where the firmware update is.

- When the camera shoots three images at once, it will display one image and then all three of them in this small window in the bottom right of the LCD screen that looks like a small movie.

Literally, it’s the weirdest thing I’ve ever seen in a camera.

With this said though, the image quality is stellar.

Image Quality

Today, my company went out onto the docks on the west side of NYC for us to film a podcast with famed wedding photographer Ryan Brenizer, who I’ve been a fan of for some time now and meeting him in person was totally humbling. I’ve been his editor for BHInsights. Man, is he a nice guy.

The image quality once again is very good. And the sensor retains quite a bit of detail in the images despite the lens not being so super-sharp. This exposure in this image was lowered a bit in post-production which really made it look better than the original. More on that later with the metering problems.

Shooting the river was super tough. As it is, shooting rivers is always tough because of the extra sunlight reflecting off of them. This took me around 7 shots to get correct, or near to it.

These images were shot in the Provia film mode, which is the standard mode on the camera.

The image above was shot in Velvia, which Fujifilm recommends for landscapes and for vivid colors. Indeed, this is perhaps my favorite mode. It really is nice and the colors are very punch, deep, rich, and pleasing.

In fact, I believe they’re more true to life.

Once again, if you over expose just a bit and then bring it back down in post-production, you get some really wonderful colors. Especially in Velvia mode.

Before we go on, continuous autofocus on this camera can be very good from what I’ve tested so far. This car was moving very, very fast but I got it.

Metering

Dear Fujifilm, we’ve got a big problem here. The metering on this camera is almost deplorable. What doesn’t help is that one’s finger can easily hit the exposure compensation dial and throw off the entire metering system. The camera has spot, evaluative and average metering. After talking this over with a co-worker, we concluded that Fujifilm threw out center-weighted because they figured that most photographers would use the center focusing point and recompose.

And they’ve be damned right, this is the camera do do that with.

With this said, I often found myself overexposing my images a full 1 and 1/3 stop or underexposing a 1/4 stop. To be honest, though it pains me to say it, this is worst metering I’ve ever seen on a camera. And I almost did not want to type that because of just how amazing the image quality is when you nail it correctly.

In the above photo, I nailed the exposure very well. Indeed, this is a camera that needs to manually metered. With that in mind, the metering dial would have been better placed on the back of the camera instead of on the top. Further, integrating dials in like the Canon G12 would have been smarter. By that, I mean that we needed a large ISO dial and a smaller exposure compensation dial on top of that.

It would have just made sense.

Macro Mode

What better to shoot with a macro mode then flowers? And what better way to notice that I was slightly out of focus than by blowing this image up on a computer screen?!

On the LCD screen, this image looked super sharp even when zoomed in. Man, was I disappointed when I saw this on my computer.

Portraits

These portraits were shot in macro mode and in aperture priority. And I have to say that they’re damned good.

These images were shot in the Astia film mode and they really good come out looking great for portraits.

Here’s Ryan again, the dude looks great in Astia. Being a portrait photographer, wedding photographer and photojournalist he knows how to pose.

And me? I’m just learning how to pose myself. But you’re always your biggest critic. As it is though, the Fujifilm X100 renders colors like I haven’t seen before. I’m quite impressed with it actually.

You can purchase the Fujifilm X100 from B&H Photo.

Please Support The Phoblographer

We love to bring you guys the latest and greatest news and gear related stuff. However, we can’t keep doing that unless we have your continued support. If you would like to purchase any of the items mentioned, please do so by clicking our links first and then purchasing the items as we then get a small portion of the sale to help run the website.

Also, please follow us on FacebookFlickr and Twitter.

  • ontheroadagain

    Enjoyed reading your article. Having read almost every review out there, this is the first time I have come across complaints about the metering on this camera. In fact, most reviews claim that the metering is one of the strong points on this camera as for example Steve Huff: http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2011/05/03/the-fuji-x100-digital-camera-real-world-review-by-steve-huff/

    Therefore, I am a bit confused by your statement. I havent handled one yet so i’ll check this out when I do..

    • Chris Gampat

      Hey,

      Thanks for the kind words.

      Don’t get me wrong, I love Steve Huff and he’s got terrific reviews. But he’s probably never used a Sekonic Light Meter in his life. Plus 10 other people at my job didn’t like the metering either, I work at B&H.

      A good tactic to use is spot meter one area, then meter an area of contrast in the image area and figure out a good midpoint.

    • Anonymous

      Hey,

      It could probably be that I’m so used to Canon’s, Nikon’s and using a Sekonic Light meter, but the metering on this camera is a puzzle. I love Steve Huff and think that he manages a terrific site with wonderful reviews. But the guy probably hasn’t used a light meter in his life.

      I ran the metering issue by a couple of fellow B&H employees, they agree. It’s got problems and takes some work.

  • Pingback: X100 Exposure question

  • http://www.laroquephoto.com Patrick La Roque

    Hmm… There are certainly issues with the X100 metering but I haven’t had serious problems with it. Make sure you set it to Multi (works better than Average which isn’t what it seems to be) and use AUTO mode for the Dynamic Range – although this only applies to JPEG shooting.

    Auto ISO can do some very strange evaluation until you realize that both Dynamic Range settings and manual ISO affect how it behaves, something that isn’t mentioned anywhere in the documentation. To get the camera to give you the full range of ISO options in AUTO you need to set manual to ISO 200 and Dynamic Range to AUTO.

    I notice a lot of blown highlights in your shots and I have to say this hasn’t been a problem with my unit. Hopefully this isn’t a problem with yours…

    Also, macro mode can be very sharp: but not at f2.0!
    That said, it took me awhile to get the most out of this camera – and I’m still not there yet. It’s indeed a quirky piece of kit so I completely understand where you’re coming from.

    Good job on the review.
    My ongoing adventure with this camera is at http://www.laroquephoto.com/blog/ if you’re interested. Sorry about the shameless plug…
    Best

  • Pingback: Field Review: Fujifilm X100 (Day 3) at The Phoblographer

  • Pingback: Fuji X100 ~ Round Up Part 3 « JonathanJK.com

  • Pingback: The Complete Fujifilm X100 Review at The Phoblographer

  • Tatiana

    my x 100 stopped to display pics on LCD anymore, can see them only in viewer… do not know if there is some settings which I did wrongly by mistake or I have to go and claim the camera.. any one can help?

  • Tatiana

    my x 100 stopped to display pics on LCD anymore, can see them only in viewer… do not know if there is some settings which I did wrongly by mistake or I have to go and claim the camera.. any one can help?

    • Anonymous

      Did you call Fuji about it?

  • Pingback: EXCLUSIVE Hands On Review: Shooting a Party with the Fuji X10 | StudioM Photo

  • Brooks Lester

    Just saw this review. I have an X100 and haven’t noticed any metering problems with it – it meters as well as anything else I’ve got – D700, GF-1, E-PL3, X10. I do find that if you set Dynamic Range beyond 100% that exposures may vary quite a bit, especially at the higher settings.

    Your images do look as if their exposures are off, with several shots looking overexposed. I wonder if you had the sticky aperture blades issue. 

    I’ve shot film since the early 1970′s and find that the Fuji X100 and X10 jpegs are the most pleasing jpeg color renderings I have ever encountered – very film like, especially with skin tones. In fact, with its jpeg superb color good dynamic range, I shoot my Fuji’s in jpeg and not RAW – the only cameras of mine that I don’t shoot RAW. Ryan B. found the same thing – he actually prefers the color of the Fuji jpegs over what he can cook up in RAW. 

Previous post:

Next post: