Field Test: The Nikon D7000 (Day 2)

by Matt Beardsley on 02/02/2011

My first outing with the Nikon D7000 was to the grand opening of Mountain View, CA’s Computer History Museum. Working with a good friend, Shawn Clark of Versatile Light in Miami, FL, I ran a red carpet photo studio with on-site printing. The very hip event was an excellent test for the camera, with drastically mixed lighting, and a strong color palate. While not distracted with pesky clients, I was able to cruise around with Nikon’s newest DSLR and put it to the test.

Handling

The D7000 is a more discrete tool than bigger Nikons, with relatively compact dimensions and a smoother sound. I will venture to say, in fact, that the D7000 is the best-sounding camera I’ve used in a long time. It has a smooth clack with no digital whine or obnoxious clap (the D3? not a quiet camera!) The camera can also be set to the drive mode ring’s “Q” setting. The Quiet mode changes the character of the sound from clack to gentle roll. The sound, while only a little quieter than normal settings, is fun to have and might help a photographer be less obtrusive during a quiet event.

In addition to sounding good, the camera does a nice job placing all the right shooting controls within quick reach. It has both front and back customize-able control wheels, and dedicated buttons for ISO and White Balance. As I discussed during Day 1, I’m a little baffled by the placement of the ISO button, with a metering area button where the ISO control should be. Indeed, during this shoot, as always, I switched ISO frequently while moving between a relatively dark exhibit hall and a bright atrium. I couldn’t think of a good reason to switch metering area. I suppose Nikon would have us consider auto ISO, and, indeed, I’ll have to test it.

I like, however, the exposure mode dial. Continuing the tradition of the D70, D80, and D90, the D7000 has a beefy and easy-to-read dial that is refreshingly simple with very little digital fluff. I’ve heard other reviewers comment that the wheel can be turned inadvertently, but haven’t experienced that myself. In fact, I’d be reluctant to trade the D7000‘s big, unguarded wheel for a locked-with-a-tiny-button design like the Pentax K-5 we tested last month. Also, it’s worth noting, the wheel is not a bad trade from the exposure mode control of Nikon’s professional cameras. Nikons like the D300s, D700 and D3-series, have an exposure mode button that a photographer holds while turning a control wheel to make selections. I believe it’s partially a concession to photographers who shoot tethered and control cameras remotely (can’t turn a big, firm dial from a computer).

Speaking of inadvertent settings, though, I was surprised when I accidentally adjusted the camera’s diopter drastically. It’s a wheel next to the camera’s eye cup and if unwittingly set to an extreme will make you think you’re going blind, at least that was my experience. By comparison, the D3 has a firmly locking diopter wheel and the Pentax K-5 has a tough diopter slider, neither of which are particularly easy to adjust, accidentally or by design.

Also, I’ve read elsewhere online criticisms of Nikon’s choice to use a drive mode selection wheel on the D7000. I like that the control has, compared to the D90, graduated to having its own, visible setting. It’s much more like the D300S, D700 and D3-series now and is intuitive and easy to use.

Shooting the D3, for example, I like to be able to switch quickly to continuous shooting in preparation for some action shot or to be able to find Mirror Up mode in the dark (it’s at the end of the wheel’s turn). Compared to the D3, the D7000 moves Live View down to its own button, which makes it much more accessible and useful (though I wouldn’t give up my D3′s AF button for it!)

Say Yes to Dual Card Slots

Like the D3, the Nikon D7000 has dual card slots, which is wonderful (dual CF slots for the D3, dual SD slots for the D7000). I routinely keep two cards in my camera and have it set for overflow. The amount of time I spend rummaging for empty cards in my bag has gone down by half. It’s also proven useful on several occasions to shoot JPGs to one card (for previewing on a laptop) and RAW files to the other to take back to the studio for processing. and to shoot duplicate copies when working, for example, as a second or assistant photographer (one card goes back to the boss, the other comes home for my portfolio).

Like the D3, the D7000 has two cards that are the same. Other cameras, like certain Canons and Leicas, have one CF and one SD, which is nice in another way. That gives you the option to shoot two formats to take advantage of both bigger, faster, cheaper CF cards, and SD cards which, can for example, be inserted directly to the current generation of Mac Book Pros. It might be, based on recent trends towards SD cards, even for professional cameras (the Pentax 645D, the Leica S2, and the Canon 1D Mark IV all have SD slots) that SD is gradually replacing CF, but I’m just speculating, and not looking forward to my whole collection of memory cards going off to e-bay. In the meantime, it’s nice to see the elements of pro Nikons that have proven to be useful in the field, trickle down to these more reasonable cameras.

Image Quality, Too Much Grain?

16.2 MP is a tremendous file size for Nikon. For several generations of cameras, the company has favored image quality over image size, a distinction from the philosophy at Canon. That could be in the process of changing now, and the D7000 is strong evidence. Files have nice color, good detail, and good tonal reach. The files, though, also have a grainy texture to them that is significantly less present in files from the full-frame, but only 12 MP D3. I’ll have to do more testing, but find the files to be noticeably noisier than the Pentax K-5, though without the K-5‘s tendency to show purple fringing. It might be that Nikon was willing to let in a little noise to raise file size, if that proves to be true during our tests, it would come as a disappointment!

It should be noted that example images for this post were all shot at ISO 1000 in relatively low light. Other images, from brighter settings, however, have also demonstrated a tendency to grain I find surprising. I’ll plan to test the in-camera noise reduction as well as response to RAW file processing in Adobe Lightroom.

All images for the post were shot using a D7000 and Nikkor AF 50mm f/1.4D.

Conclusion, Day 2

The Nikon D7000 is a smooth-handling camera with good control layout and a sturdy, comfortable frame. I especially like the camera’s exposure and drive mode controls and its live view/video controls. I miss the AF button and more prominent ISO button placement of bigger Nikons, but this is a more affordable, smaller, and lighter camera that does a nice job drawing design elements from both professional and enthusiast models.

My initial impression of the camera’s image quality is that, while producing vibrant, detailed, relatively large files, the camera also produces more than expected grain at moderate ISO. It’s too early in the testing to be certain, but it’ll certainly be something we keep a close eye on as the test moves forward. Next time, I’ll head out for some shots in bright sunshine and give the autofocus a workout!

Image Gallery (click thumbnails to open files in a new window)

Please Support The Phoblographer

We love to bring you guys the latest and greatest news and gear related stuff. However, we can’t keep doing that unless we have your continued support. If you would like to purchase any of the items mentioned, please do so by clicking our links first and then purchasing the items as we then get a small portion of the sale to help run the website.

Also, please follow us on FacebookFlickr and Twitter.

  • http://www.rettferdighet.info Rennie

    Looks great! Can’t wait to get my hands on this :) Thanks for posting!

  • http://halfbinary.net Alex

    I got a D7000 last month and I, too, have found that there’s a bit of grain in images around ISO 800, but coming from a point-and-shoot, I’ll take grain over color noise any day. And I’ve found the lower ISOs to look perfectly clean.

    The shots you’re posting here look really clean (but I understand they’re not 100% crop), how are you processing them?

  • Matt Beardsley

    Alex,

    Thanks for the comment. These were all processed NEF files in Adobe Lightroom 3.3. I agree it’s an awesome step up from any point and shoot! I think it’s fair to say the camera has a bit more grain in certain settings than some competitors (I’ll be testing it against the Pentax K-5 today for an entry next week). It also has a very good control layout, great ergonomics, and access to a very wide range of lenses… Do you have a favorite lens for the D7000?

    ~Matt

  • patcam

    Yours is the only review among the many available on the Internet raising questions about noise at higher ISO’s. All other reviews I’ve read seem to focus on just how noise-free photos at high ISO’s are and that the D7000 sets a new standard for this issue in DX format cameras. Can they all be wrong and your results correct?

    • Chris Gampat

      We don’t lie :)

      Ask our readers.

  • Tom Karasmanis

    Thanks for your great “real world articles” and I like your candid writing style.

    I have a D80 and some lenses (Tokina 11-16, Nikon 18-70, Nikon 35 f/1.8, Nikon 50 mm f/1.8D, Nikon 55-200VR, and some others from film. I find when I travel I love to have a good quality camera and am often willing to carry a heavy pack on my back, but with a 3 year old in tow it is getting tiring. I am trying to lighten my kit while preserving as much IQ as possible. I have an S95 for pure pocketability and an LX-3 which is not quite as pocketable. I want to add decent quality video with AF and zoom while videoing and faster AF and shutter than S95.

    I am considering everything from the impressive D7000 (just go for IQ) to the D3100 (impressive IQ for low $$$ and much less size and weight) to the GH-2 (not as good stills, but still fast AF and shutter and very excellent video) to E-PL2 compromise, but much less $$$ and hopefully much better than the S95).

    My thinking now is that while the D7000 is an excellent camera, the few issues surroundig it (hot pixels, noise, etc.) may not make it ideal for me (I would consider giving up the size and weight for mind-blowing IQ) and I have to live with a noisy AF motor that I can hear on the video. The D3100 is probably a good compromise all around as I can use my nikon lenses and have quite good IQ. The GH-2 is not right for me now as I have to see wht Canon and nikon will release before making tht level of commitment (close to $2000 for GH-2, 14-140 and 20mm f.1.7). THe E-PL2 may be a good inexpensive compromise for a year or two until EVIL gets better.

    Budget is not unlimited … of the D7000 had the video quality and features of the GH-2 I would get it, otherwise, I likely need to look at an alternative. Any thoughts?

    I await the rest of your review to help me decide!

    BTW, the link at the top I think is broken. When I click “Field Test: The Nikon D7000 (Day 2)” I get a Page not Found error.

    Thanks,
    tk

    The link

  • doug

    May be a really stupid suggestion, but you may want to check the specs of the lenses you have for the d80, if the autofocus will work for the d3100. i had that issue a few years ago with the d40x, bought on impulse out of town, and got home and my 2 lenses from nikon film camera the AF does not work. I may be way wrong!!

  • patcam

    What is “We don’t lie Ask our readers” supposed to mean? I didn’t say you were lying, just that somehow, whether through user error or any number of possible reasons you seem to have come to conclusions diametrically opposite to those of numerous other reviewers, none of whom I suspect are lying either.You don’t seem to want to answer my legitimate question. Are you saying that all the other reviews are wrong? Steve’s Digicams, for example, just posted their lengthy review of the D7000 today [2.2.2011]. The high ISO examples posted there and elsewhere in other reviews don’t bear out your claim of “more than expected grain at moderate ISO and ‘noisy’ files”.

    • Chris Gampat

      These were our results and I’m sticking to Matt’s findings.

  • kk

    We picked up the D7000 in December. It was sold out everywhere so getting ahold of one from Best Buy, we considered ourselves quite lucky.

    I bought it for indoor sports. My girls do competitive cheerleading. At our home gym, I’ve shot as high as ISO-6400. Obviously, some grain was noticeable but the pictures were quite usable.

    At competitions I shoot from 800-1600. These pictures do not require any noise reduction; either in camera or post processing.

    I’ve blown away everyone else in the gym that have been taking competition photos. Everyone asks me to take photos for them.

    I did cheat at one competition and rented a 70-200 2.8. People thought the photos were taken by the professionals at the event. (that lens is now on order) These were taken around ISO-800 and look fantastic. These could be cropped without again without NR.

    All photos were compressed in camera to JPEG, full size FINE setting.

  • Matt Beardsley

    Thank you for the comments… Sounds like people are really enjoying the newest Nikon! I really like it too. it has a lot in common with the professional Nikons I use day-to-day. And, compared to Nikons just a few years old, its image quality is revolutionary (A big improvement over, for example, the Nikon D200 I have as a backup body).

    Really, to be more clear about my grain findings, the market is very competitive now. I’ve spent three months with Pentax’s new K-5 and done several side-by-side comparisons. I prefer the Nikon D7000′s control layout and color rendering… to my eye, images look better in terms color. The K-5, though, has a fraction of the D7000′s grain.

    The grain isn’t ugly or particularly noisy, but it is more than direct competitors. Photographers who are really interested in printing large images, or who spend lots of time in Photoshop will want to at least consider moving a little higher up the Nikon line. For web-viewing, and up to 8×10, the camera’s grain is a non-issue.. and the D7000 has very good ergonomics, controls, autofocus, etc etc… It is fast, fun, and highly capable.

    Yesterday and today, I’ve been working on a much more in-depth entry on image quality. I spent time yesterday shooting the K-5 and D7000 side by side, in the studio, and outdoors. The process really has me enjoying the strengths of both cameras and I look forward to sharing!

    KK, I know you’ll love having a 70-200mm! I reviewed it on my own Web site here:

    http://photoartsmonthly.com/blog/2010/07/07/the-nikon-70-200mm-f2-8-vr-ii/

    Thanks again everyone, be sure to check back for the rest of the D7000 series…. and let me know what you think as it unfolds!

    ~Matt

  • Pingback: ISO Torture Test: Pentax K-5 vs. Nikon D7000, which is better? at The Phoblographer

  • Pingback: The Nikon D7000 (updated 9 Feb 2011) | in focus - a malaysian photography blog

  • Pingback: Which One? Nikon D7000 or Nikon D5100 at The Phoblographer

Previous post:

Next post: