Field Review: The Pentax K-5 (Day 4)

by Matt Beardsley on 01/07/2011

This week, I took our Pentax K-5 along on an engagement portrait shoot in the scenic Oakland hills, and – for the third field test in a row with the robust little Pentax – it was raining. I will say, without hesitation, that we have tested and proved the weather sealing of both camera and 55mm f/1.4 DA* lens. In our previous entry (here) I discussed both the camera’s discreet and capable handling while photographing a wedding (a rainy wedding) and a critical issue of purple fringing in certain images.

Before reading this posting, you may want to read about it used at a wedding, in tough weather, and my initial feelings.

The Pentax K-5 and Portrait Photography

The fringing is certainly an issue I hope to see Pentax acknowledge and address via firmware update. In the meantime, it’s difficult to find fault with this high-end crop-sensor 35mm DSLR. As with previous tests, I enjoyed using it on a portrait shoot. It is quick, smart, smooth, and fun to shoot, and the Pentax SMC DA* 55mm f/1.4 SDMis an exceptional portrait lens with painterly out-of-focus areas and smooth contrast, color, and sharpness. Both are also nicely weather sealed (and what other Website would go the extra mile and test that for you?)

Automatic Metering

I rarely take a camera out of manual exposure mode. It is such a studied habit to pick an exposure and shoot a set of consistent images, with only occasional adjustments to depth of focus or brightness. Most modern DSLRs do a good job selecting for themselves settings in P, A, or S modes, but most professional photographers are reluctant to surrender creative control. The Pentax K-5 is perhaps the first camera I’ve used for a portrait shoot that I would trust to pick exposure settings. It is amazingly customizable, including “Program Line” adjustments to veer selected settings towards blurring backgrounds, action, wide depth of focus landscapes, etc. The settings it picks, more importantly, are consistently spot on.

With the San Francisco Bay Area’s rolling cloud cover and frequent exposure changes, the camera’s Aperture Priority setting saved the day, with consistent F/2.0 blurry backdrops and the changing light neutralized by the camera’s smart shutter speed selections. I find the K-5to be a dependable partner on a shoot, able and willing to automatically select every setting or be fully manually controlled.

The camera’s metering can be set for average, center weighted, or spot mode via the flat wheel below the exposure mode dial. The two controls are a bit out of place on the K-5for their relatively flimsy build (when compared to the beefiness of the rest of the camera) but work well and are easy to read and operate, even in low light and with cold, wet fingers. The very capable average setting makes the other two settings less critical. The K-5does a great job picking settings to nicely emphasize portrait subjects.

To sum it up, the Pentax K-5is among the best cameras on the market at metering and selecting exposure mode settings automatically. It continues Pentax’s DSLR tradition of cameras designed to be fully manual, care-free automatic, or anywhere in between.

Portrait Image Quality

Natural-light portrait shoots, like our test here, can play well to some of the Pentax K-5‘s strengths. In terms of image quality, the camera does a nice job rendering smooth contrast, accurate and believable colors, and a lightly-textured sharpness that I find flattering for portrait subjects. Given the overcast day and dim December afternoon light, I chose to shoot some of these at ISO 800 which rendered clean, usable results with grain only visible at close inspection.

The 55mm f/1.4 DA* is a good choice for portrait photography. On the K-5 it is a rough equivalent to a full frame 85mm (a standard portrait lens, and we said rough equivalent). The 55mm, as you can see in the test images, allows smooth falloff to liquidy out-of-focus areas and sharp, nicely detailed subjects. The images here have been adjusted with Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3‘s automatic lens profile corrections which support both the K-5and 55mm f/1.4 DA*.

One image quality area of caution would be skin tone highlights. During our test shoot, the camera was relatively quick to let skin tone highlights clip or “blow out” at times when other cameras might have held on to detail. K-5 owners might find themselves slightly underexposing in situations like this to preserve skin detail, while many competing cameras tend to yield better results with slight over-exposing. It’s not a problem, but an interesting observation.

As a summary of the camera’s portrait image quality, I’d say it does a very nice job generating clean, workable files that can be creatively processed. It captures a wide range of neutral color, fine detail, and attractive contrast. I still found worrisome evidence of the camera’s critical purple fringing issue discussed in my Day 3 Entry, though it was much less noticeable in this day’s even overcast light.

Conclusion, Day 4

The Pentax K-5 continues to be a fun little camera to shoot. I’ve enjoyed using it as both a landscape and portrait camera. It is uniquely customizable, offering many options for controls and file output. On a portrait shoot – even in the rain – it provides easy operation, smooth autofocus and metering and will bring home attractive images with good color, detail, and contrast. I continue to be impressed with it’s compact size and comfortable ergonomics. Check back soon for Day 5!

If you have any questions about the camera and lens combo, let us know in the comments below. I’d love to help. Also be sure to check out my own blog!

Please Support The Phoblographer

We love to bring you guys the latest and greatest news and gear related stuff. However, we can’t keep doing that unless we have your continued support. If you would like to purchase any of the items mentioned, please do so by clicking our links first and then purchasing the items as we then get a small portion of the sale to help run the website.

Also, please follow us on FacebookFlickr and Twitter.

  • Jonas

    Can a UV filter reduce purple fringing?

    I came across your review of this camera in my research for a possible purchase of a K-5. I appreciate reading it – thanks for posting! It was the only review of about ten that I read in which purple fringing (PF) was mentioned, so I hoped that the camera you got was faulty. I googled PF and K-5, and found that it was discussed also in some other reviews, as well as forums, so it seems to be not only your camera. I have found sample pictures where it can be seen, but also sample pictures with bright areas (like sun-lit snow) against dark areas where it is not very visible. I have one question or suggestion to you: could a UV filter reduce the occurrence of PF? Would you be able to try that?

    Best regards,

    Jonas

    PS:
    My only experience with this camera is limited to holding and operating it in a store, and it was the only one that fit my (rather normal-sized) hands perfectly. The bigger brands’ cameras in the same class where both bulkier and less comfortable to hold for me.

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      Hi Jonas,

      Welcome to the site, thanks for the compliments.

      A UV Filters cannot reduce purple fringing, that’s a sensor problem. I read some of those other reviews and forum posts while editing Matt’s posting. There were people that thought that it was the lens we had that might have been causing the problem: then it was quickly disproved by other forum postings stating and mentioning that we are using the 55mm limited (one of Pentax’s most prized lenses.)

      I’m willing to say that it could be our unit, the K-5 is in California and I’m based in NYC. In contrast, we haven’t experienced the sensor stain issues.

      -Chris Gampat
      Editor-in-Chief.

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      Also, don’t let that hinder your purchase. Purple fringing can be corrected in software. If you like the Pentax, then go for it. Use our review so far and this to help you: http://thephoblographer.com/2010/04/16/the-best-budget-lenses/

  • Jonas

    Thank you for the very swift replies! I value your review for two reasons:
    1: you have a photographer’s perspective in your evaluation (as opposed to technical resolution measurements etc),
    2: you usually use a different brand of camera, so should not be biased.

    I have read about the sensor stains too, but I found a post on that in a forum that says that it has been resolved by Pentax (link below).

    http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-k-5-forum/127898-statement-pentax-germany.html

    And since the camera is smaller, lighter and the best to hold (for me), I think I will go for it. Weather resistance is also an important factor, as I will bring it to the mountains. I currently use a Panasonic LX-3, so going to any D-SLR is a big step in both weight and size for me.

    Just one thing (and I am speculating a bit now): Even if purple fringing is a sensor problem, could it not be caused by the sensor diffracting UV light in its micro lenses? Since PF has a color and is not white, it does not happen to all photo sites on the sensor equally – that is why I think it happens before the light goes through the red, green or blue micro filters covering the photo sites. Perhaps primarily the blue photo sites’ micro filters let a little bit more UV light through than they should, and the UV light would be a little out of focus even with a pro-grade lens (unless it was made for UV photography – if anyone does that). My apologies if this becomes to speculative – I do not want to start a long debate based on speculations, but I still think it could have to do with UV light at the sensor level (by the sensor either diffracting it in the sensor plane or the blue photo sites simply registering it a little bit to much).

    - Jonas

  • Jonas

    OK, thanks a lot for the feedback!

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      No problem. Thanks for the visit :)

  • http://beardsleyphoto.com Matt Beardsley

    Hello Jonas,

    Thank you for your comments. I have really enjoyed the K-5, have had it for almost two months now. I don’t use it with a filter (I try to avoid extra layers on the lens).

    Our unit definitely has a purple fringing issue and I will venture to say that it isn’t the lens. It’s actually our second lens, the first had a focus issue and was very quickly replaced by Pentax (they were awesome to work with). Apparently, it’s also true that not all K-5′s have the problem. I’m confident that Pentax would replace your camera if you had problems.

    The K-5′s many strengths make it a great choice for someone looking for a compact, highly-customizable, and capable camera. It has awesome metering, great image quality, and very impressive dynamic range. And, as you’ve felt, is nice to hold and operate…

    I’ll check my stock of filters and see if I have one that makes any difference for the fringing. If so, I’ll be sure to mention it in the upcoming Day 5.

    Thanks, Jonas,

    Matt

  • Jonas

    I will be looking forward to the Day 5 post (not only because of the filter test)!

    Another thought (and this one I am pretty sure would help at least in some cases): The camera has a highlight priority mode, where it basically underexposes the image by 1 stop and then brings it back up to correct brightness, to leave more highlight recovery possibilities. This would reduce highlight clipping, and thus I would guess any purple fringing if present as well.

    I am leaning towards getting this camera, so the biggest decision left for me now is whether the 18-55 or 18-135 is the one to go with. Speaking against the latter is the bigger size and weight, but then again it is not that big a difference. I sometimes go for several days unsupported in the wilderness, so I cannot have too heavy gear.

    Greetings from Sweden,

    Jonas

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      In that case I want to tell you to hold out a bit longer. Why?

      I’ve got the Olympus E-5 in for review and will be burying it under snow for a little bit.

      After the reviews are all wrapped up we’re going to be putting the 7D, D300s, K-5, and E-5 up against one another in one huge posting.

  • Dee

    Hello,

    Thank you for your series on the K-5.
    Deciding between this unit and the Sony A-55, as a good system (lenses selections included) to grow with.

    Key interests are in action shoots (ocean, and surfers) as well as landscapes. Being light weight and smaller helps too for extensive travel.

    Concerned about the rumored AF issues of the K-5 Advice is welcomed and appreciated.

    Thank you in advance,
    Dee

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      A55′s isn’t marketed as weatherproof, just an FYI.

      I’ll let Matt get back to you about the rest.

  • http://beardsleyphoto.com Matt Beardsley

    Dee,

    I really enjoy the Pentax K-5 and suspect it would be great for action shooting on the beach. You probably noticed in the reviews, but I’ve had it out in the rain on a number of occasions and it’s shown no problems from getting repeatedly soaked. Sony (with Nikon and Canon) has the distinct advantage of the potential to upgrade to full-frame 35mm. Canon and Nikon offer the advantage of a much wider system of lenses and accessories.

    Unfortunately, I don’t yet have experience with the A-55. I believe it has a similar sensor to the Pentax and adds a unique stationary mirror. Based on the specs, it sounds like a much more rewarding camera for video recording (not the K-5′s strongest aspect). Based on my interpretation from other reviews, the Pentax is a more capable and comfortable tool for photography. Also, I would really have to be convinced to used a non-optical viewfinder as on the Sony!

    Just my thoughts… thank you for your kind remarks about my reviews!

    Matt

  • Pingback: Field Review: The Pentax K-5 (Day 5) at The Phoblographer

Previous post:

Next post: