Hands On: Diana 38mm and 20mm on the Canon 5D Mk II

by Chris Gampat on 01/04/2011

Experimenting with new formats and styles is something that helps to keep the minds of all photographers fresh and creative. While attending an event at the Lomography store a couple of weeks back, the Lomography Diana F+ Adaptor for Canon EOS mountcried out to me like a slab of bread with Nutella smeared on it. Since my 5D Mark IIwas on me, I decided to have some digital toy camera fun.

Ergonomics

Both lenses (Lomography Diana F+ 38mm Super Wide Angle Lensand Lomography Diana + 20mm Fisheye Lens) are small and very light. They will easily fit onto a coat pocket or you can even stuff them into the larger pockets of carpenter pants.

These don’t feel like any other lenses most readers of this site have probably felt. There is no smooth focusing mechanism on these babies, no metal, no sense of balance when you mount them onto the mount and then the camera, etc.

In fact, most users may even be put off by the fact that the lenses don’t screw onto the mount perfectly and securely. They tend to be a bit loose—which would set off an alarm for most photographers shooting seriously. To be fair, if you were to mount these on a DSLR meant for fun-shooting then you would be more at ease.

Keep in mind that when you put these onto a Canon EF camera body that there is no aperture control: so exposing will be a guessing game unless you have knowledge of the zone-metering system and how light gets transmitted onto the sensor.

Build Quality

They’re plastic: not super-hard resin plastic but more like baseball bat plastic. Granted, I do feel that they can endure a bit of a beating, but they will most likely be out of commission after a couple months of hard use if a photographer chooses to. These lenses feel like toys that were stuck into a microscope kit that you may have received as a gift when you were a kid.

Because they are plastic though and there are no mechanical parts, you can shoot with less fear of having to repair said mechanical parts at a repair shop.

Focusing

These things focus so weirdly. Looking through the viewfinder seems a bit useless when trying to focus. In fact, I found it best to just use the LCD screen vs the distance scale on these lenses.

And when I turned the focusing dial, I needed to hold the lens in place on the mount to ensure that the two didn’t separate.

Image Quality

Diana 38mm

Diana 38mm

Diana 20mm fisheye

Would I buy them?: No

Were they fun?: Yes

Do they need improvement?: God yes, but they weren’t designed to be used on an EF body.

I’d actually suggest that there be lenses made specifically for Canon EF mount cameras. Rebel users may really love them, but this may violate the whole analogue culture (yes, it is spelled that way.) They are very cool though: I’d probably use them for a creative effect in videos.

Please Support The Phoblographer

We love to bring you guys the latest and greatest news and gear related stuff. However, we can’t keep doing that unless we have your continued support. If you would like to purchase any of the items mentioned, please do so by clicking our links first and then purchasing the items as we then get a small portion of the sale to help run the website.

Also, please follow us on Facebook, Flickr and Twitter.

  • Gevon Servo

    I have wanted to get my hands on these lenses, they may yet still end up in my collection. I want to do Coffee photography with the Diana 38mm

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      They’re really not bad, I’d shoot Bacon with them. My only complaint is build quality and that I wish that the mounting wasn’t so flimsy.

    • Yvonne

      Oooo never thought of that!! If you do get one or two,, take electrical tape to keep it secure. Trust me in this.

      • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

        Thanks Yvonne, I appreciate the advice. If I request review units I’ll give that a try.

  • Yvonne

    I have taken a few photos with the 38mm and it did jump off my 7D and bounced down the cement path. Ater my initial horror, i realized it was plastic, dusted it off and gaffa tapes it to the holder and some electrical tape to hold the canon converter to the body. Fun?? Yes.. Useful, well I prefer my analogue camera for lomography. Still sometimes it’s good to break out of the mould.

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      Agreed about breaking out of the mold, totally.

  • http://www.wildlife-pictures-online.com/ Scotch

    I recently bought the Diana 38mm for fun use on a Canon Rebel and also found the lens popping out of the adaptor, till I did some research and found that you’re meant to twist the Diana really firmly into the mount till it clicks into place.

    The mount also clicks into place on the body if you line it up correctly … so that you have to use the normal lens-release button to remove it. Then no more problems, both fit firmly and snugly.

    I was trying to guess the rough focal length of the 38mm lens on a Canon Rebel body and found this on the Lomography site: “When used on a 35mm SLR camera, the Diana+ 38mm Super Wide Lens is equivalent to a 72mm lens. Used on a APS-C sensor DSLR it has the effect of a 115mm telephoto lens!”

    Not sure if the mount makes the difference, but when I tested the Diana against a Canon 18-55mm kit lens, the Diana covers the same subject as does the Canon lens at 39mm, which is about 62mm full-frame equivalent.

    Is the Diana 38mm lens plus adaptor worth the bucks? Probably not, but I’m already having some fun with it and find it works well as a release from paranoia about exposure and sharpness. Just stick the camera on M, and try different shutter speeds till it looks okay – which real Lomography people can’t do with their film cameras!

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      When the lens clicks into place, you still need to manually focus and it becomes flimsy and loose then. I had a rep at the Lomography store demo this to me. For those that prefer to have their sensor protected, it’s a bit of a shame.

      As for mounting to the body itself, you are correct.

      I agree about the release of paranoia. Sometimes we need to shoot just for fun and forget to do this. Trying something new like this is really cool as well.

  • Taylor

    Cool article. Thanks.
    I did think it was funny though that you made an aside about how analogue was spelled, but you used the wrong “there their they’re” in the previous sentence. Haha. Unless this is not American English…

    But still great stuff!

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      Hi Taylor,

      The usage is correct.

  • Taylor

    Yes it is!
    was on my iPhone apologies be there

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Hands On: Diana 38mm and 20mm on the Canon 5D Mk II at The Phoblographer -- Topsy.com

  • Pingback: Field Review: Lomography DianaF+ 38mm & 20mm Fisheye Lenses with Nikon F Mount at The Phoblographer

  • Pingback: Field Review: Lomography DianaF+ 38mm & 20mm Fisheye Lenses with Nikon F Mount | Find the best photographers.

  • Pingback: Field Review: Lomography DianaF+ 38mm & 20mm Fisheye Lenses with Nikon F Mount | myeyefi.co.tv

Previous post:

Next post: