Why I'm Now Considering an iPad/Tablet For Photography

by Chris Gampat on 03/15/2010

Myself and Vincent extensively covered tablet PCs and their applications for photographers a while ago. Back then, I concluded at the moment that I probably wouldn’t get one. Despite the fact that still stands, I’m actually considering it now. There are actually a couple of good reasons why as well. More on this after the jump.

Photographers in general have essentially said no to the iPad, at least this version of it. I’ve heard many say that it’s not worth it as it is essentially just a giant iPhone or iPod Touch.

This is true.

However, there are times for photographers that you are meeting a client somewhere and you actually don’t want to lug around a giant printed Portfolio or a laptop. In this case, a tablet PC would be a very nice option. Think about it: It’s got a decent sized screen, can display high resolution photos, can possibly be touch activated, is more portable than a laptop, and may even be the price of a netbook.

I read on Vincent LaFloret’s Blog that he’s ordered a few iPads. Granted, we’re not all doing as well as him, but he makes a good point.

“I plan on converting my entire portfolio to the digital format with these – both still & motion. As many of you know – most art buyers these days pretty much demand that commercial photographers send their portfolios out in a printed book format. So while I can’t ditch that approach just yet – nothing is stopping me from including an iPad in that book as well to share not only stills, but also the video / multimedia work that I’ve done in the past 2-3 years. I’ve been waiting to do this for years – waiting for the perfect device – and I think that this will work perfectly – and allow me to send customized portfolios to clients as well for specific jobs. This is a lot more eco friendly (not to mention easier and cheaper to ship!) current, and dynamic way to show one’s work…I will of course offer to send “just” the iPad if art buyers are into it – but I doubt that the printed portfolio is done just yet…”

He’s got a good point and I can actually relate in some ways. I wouldn’t go so far as treat an iPad as a disposable portfolio to send to clients, but it is a very nice way that is interactive to show it off to them. Additionally, let’s face it, Apple products have always had some sort of wow factor to them. Maybe it’s Steve Jobs and the way he explains how consumers and professionals can utilize their products, but everyone always seems to want something made by the company whether they have use for it or are blind fanboys.

An iPad would be attractive to clients as long as it can display the best of the best of my work. It would also keep my laptop safe just in case something happens. For example, I brought my laptop out into the pouring NYC rain the other day in the safety of a neoprene sleeve and my messenger bag. However, this was the type of rain that can soak through anything. Luckily, my Macbook was fine. But the iPad or a similar tablet would have done the job sufficiently well.

Or maybe I’m just feeding into the fact that so many other tech writers and photographers want one. We’ll see. The fact is though that I am still intrigued by this particular sector of products.

  • http://www.pixel8design.wordpress.com ♥pixel8design♥

    YESS!!! I am SO glad someone’s FINALLY posting about the iPad being good. I talked to one of the specialists I know at the Apple store, and he talked about the iPad being god. I’m not 100% sold on it–meaning I’m not going to be the first to buy it–but if I had more money than homework, I’d be in line to get one. I love the ideas you have to use it for photography! I’d do the same with a graphic design portfolio. I’m working on my first website in class, and just think if I had that all finished with my best designs on it … I could show that off! Or better yet… I like the idea of that iBooks app, and I dream of the day when all my school textbooks come in ebook form–on the iPad. THAT would be almost heaven (Heaven is no school at all, but taking ALL my books with me would be almost heaven).

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      Thanks Alyssa. I appreciate it.

    • jeevan

      kill that dirty ipad, chic is the notion ink adam, with 3.1 megapixel cam, and HD video

    • Mike

      “I talked to one of the specialists I know at the Apple store, and he talked about the iPad being god.”

      Now there’s an unbiased recommendation for you…

      Frankly using the iPad to show photos barely ranks as an idea. I mean it’s a computing device (with many limitations) that has a screen, so *of course* images are viewable.

      Frankly a *real* Tablet PC is much more interesting and useful, as I can do *anything* with it including running PhotoShop, using image and video formats not supported by Apple, and using a variety of peripherals and communication modes. Supporting touch and a stylus makes it a much much more powerful device for working with media. A slate model is an especially portable way to show images on top of this.

      • http://www.pixel8design.wordpress.com ♥pixel8design♥

        that was supposed to be funny.

  • http://disconnectedneuronactivity.wordpress.com fahadsadah

    Are you, a photographer, seriously recommending a device without a camera for photography?

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      I’ve got a 5D Mk II and won’t use the camera, ever. They can keep it.

    • jeevan

      you are absolutely right

    • http://www.pixel8design.wordpress.com ♥pixel8design♥

      Um… I wouldn’t expect a good camera on that thing anyhow. It’s pretty much a portable, digital portfolio. Since when do paper portfolios come with free mini cameras?

  • http://www.uberpix.wordpress.com sravan953

    I think the only incentive for photographers to buy an iPad is that it can display images at 1080p quality.

  • http://www.christiancontroversy.com Bobby Bentz

    I think that technology of today is amazing. And it’s people like this guy, that will utilize it to the best of its advantage. you go guy

  • http://aspiringphotog.wordpress.com aspiringphotog

    Interesting idea for a tablet PC use. It would probably impress clients too. It seems like a limited idea. I’m not completely sold, but it’ll be nice to hear how it goes for photographers who use it.

  • http://alphatracks.com Tom Bonner

    Color me confused. Why would a camera be important to photographers using the iPad? I understand it would be great for things like video conferencing, but that doesn’t have any thing to do with photography.

    Even in the unlikely event that a future iPad included a high resolution camera with a APS-C or larger sensor, I couldn’t see anyone using the device to capture photographs. that isn’t the device’s function.

    On the other hand, I think a lot of photographers will find the iPad indispensable for portfolio display, email on the go, web surfing and staying in touch with clients. At some point there will be apps for RAW conversion and tethered shooting.

    My desktop Mac has no camera, but it is a major part of my photography workflow. I expect in the near future an iPad will become just as important.

    – Tom

  • http://www.michaelkirschner.wordpress.com Michael Kirschner

    Where were you guys when the original tablets came out? And now that there are other tablets coming out at the same time as the app;e tablet why would you go with the apple above the others? To me the apple tablet with its inability to handle more than one program at the same time is what puts it behind all the other current tablets, as WELL as tablets that came out in 2002. I am willing to bet that if Microsoft came out with a tablet that could not handle multiple programs everyone would call it a failure that shouldn’t have even left the drawing boards of engineers, but since this one is created by apple we give them a free pass, coming up with excuses like, “well it is not really a computer so it is ok that it can only handle one program at a time”, when you and I know darn well if any other company especially Microsoft had the same limitations that they would not get a free pass on that, and rightfully so don’t get me wrong.

    • http://thephoblographer.wordpress.com Chris Gampat

      Hi Mike,

      Thanks for stopping by. I was around and aware of when the first tablet PCs came out. But their processors were horrible. I’m not fully praising the iPad. I said that I’m open to others as well.

      I’m considering an iPad. However, I’ve clearly made it known in other posts that my stance is with the HP Slate. They’re excellent for carrying around portfolios.

      Let’s weigh this: portable photo display vs tablet with great photo viewing experience. That’s all I would really use it for as I have a Macbook and a gaming PC. Portable photo displays look horrible. The best I’ve seen are probably from Samsung but even then I wouldn’t want to show off my photos to clients on them. The iPad has a brilliant screen much like all Apple products. Why not go for it?

    • jeevan

      well said mr.micheal

  • http://glakia.wordpress.com Lakia

    These things are really hot! I def want one…

    • http://inellezshayra.wordpress.com Inelle Zshayra

      I agree!

  • http://inellezshayra.wordpress.com Inelle Zshayra

    You really have a nice idea, using it for your photography! Many says iPAD is worthless for it’s only a bigger version of the iPOD or iPHONE but didn’t they think that Apple won’t create this if it is worthless? For the last time, I love your idea!

  • David

    I think this is a worthwhile usage for the iPad… definitely more viable than using it as an e-Reader. However, I would if you would start missing your laptop once you start using it to show clients your work. I’m not sure exactly what kind of photography you do, and who your clients are… but, what if your client wants to see a specific effect applied to a picture, where you might have to pull up Photoshop… or maybe they wanted to show you some pictures they saw on a flash-powered website to get an idea for what they want.

    Maybe these are unlikely scenarios for the kinds of photography you do, but I would imagine that you would want to go to your clients with the best tools available… and I would think the best tool would be a full laptop that gives you and your client options to work with on the spot.

  • anthony

    ipad is crazy man
    portfolio with it
    dam
    but some clients rather have a traditional portfolio
    i mean putting it on ipad can make you look really lazy

  • http://publicpookie.wordpress.com publicpookie

    i agree! i’m a fashion designer, not a full time photographer, but i do a lot of digital artwork and would love to have an ipad as my portable portfolio.

  • http://www.mazingimages.com Brad

    Yes! It is great to see so many others who had this click the instant they saw this! There have been so many instances where I whip out my iphone to share pictures and I know that if I had this instead it would have such a great impact in sharing my work than having to look at a small 3 inch screen. This is like essentially digital 8×10 portfolio if not MULTIPLE portfolios all in one!!

  • http://aspiringphotog.wordpress.com aspiringphotog

    I’ve been thinking on this some more. Having a tablet for a portfolio would actually be pretty cost saving. Rather than print a new portfolio every time you need to update, you’d have an electronic one. You’d be able to show a lot more portfolios, and customize them per client.

    Getting more sold on this concept… (not that I’m going to dish out the $$$ for it anytime soon. I like Mac’s, but very wary of any Apple iProduct)

  • http://www.imagebychristos.com Christos Sewell

    Has anyone considered HOW they are going to transfer their hi resolution photos over to to the iPAD.

    Currently, you will need to transfer photos via iTunes. Particular Photographers who use their iPhone or iTouch to show off photos notice that iTunes “optimizes” photos to its own standards whether you want it to or not.

    This means a considerable drop in sharpness, color shifts and tonal inconsistencies. If I can notice this on my iPhone, imagine how evident it will look on the iPad.

    The only way around this currently (on the iPhone) is to email myself each picture and to save it to the gallery. This is not a fluid workflow, and it is my hope that Apple recognizes the large amount of people who will use this as a professional presentation device (aka Portfolio). Hopefully, someone will devise a solution for image transfer that bypasses the “Optimization” process.

    Christos

Previous post:

Next post: